Critical Care Follow-up Clinics

A Scoping Review of Interventions and Outcomes

Sue Lasiter, Sylwia K. Oles, James Mundell, Susan London, Babar Khan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this scoping review is to identify evidence describing benefits of interventions provided in intensive care unit (ICU) survivor follow-up clinics. Background: Advances in ICU treatments have increased the number of survivors who require specialized care for ICU-related sequelae. Intensive care unit survivor follow-up clinics exist, yet little is known about the nature and impact of interventions provided in such clinics. A scoping review of publications about in-person post-ICU follow-up care was undertaken. Method: Ten databases were searched yielding 111 relevant unique publication titles and abstracts. Sample heterogeneity supported using a scoping review method. After excluding nonrelated publications, 33 reports were fully reviewed. Twenty international publications were included that described ICU follow-up clinic interventions and/or outcomes. Results: Authors discussed very diverse interventions in 15 publications, and 9 reported some level of intervention effectiveness. Evidence was strongest that supported the use of prospective diaries as an intervention to prevent or improve psychological symptoms, whereas evidence to support implementation of other interventions was weak. Conclusions: Although ICU follow-up clinics exist, evidence for interventions and effectiveness of treatments in these clinics remains underexplored. Implications: Intensive care unit survivor follow-up clinics provide a venue for further interdisciplinary intervention research that could lead to better health outcomes for ICU survivors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-237
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Nurse Specialist
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Intensive Care Units
Survivors
Publications
Aftercare
Databases
Psychology
Health
Research

Keywords

  • healthcare system
  • ICU follow-up clinic
  • ICU survivor follow-up clinics
  • intensive care survivors
  • scoping review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Assessment and Diagnosis
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing
  • LPN and LVN

Cite this

Critical Care Follow-up Clinics : A Scoping Review of Interventions and Outcomes. / Lasiter, Sue; Oles, Sylwia K.; Mundell, James; London, Susan; Khan, Babar.

In: Clinical Nurse Specialist, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.07.2016, p. 227-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lasiter, Sue ; Oles, Sylwia K. ; Mundell, James ; London, Susan ; Khan, Babar. / Critical Care Follow-up Clinics : A Scoping Review of Interventions and Outcomes. In: Clinical Nurse Specialist. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 227-237.
@article{803a6a9d56e24f52adfd9820a6e1ad1a,
title = "Critical Care Follow-up Clinics: A Scoping Review of Interventions and Outcomes",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this scoping review is to identify evidence describing benefits of interventions provided in intensive care unit (ICU) survivor follow-up clinics. Background: Advances in ICU treatments have increased the number of survivors who require specialized care for ICU-related sequelae. Intensive care unit survivor follow-up clinics exist, yet little is known about the nature and impact of interventions provided in such clinics. A scoping review of publications about in-person post-ICU follow-up care was undertaken. Method: Ten databases were searched yielding 111 relevant unique publication titles and abstracts. Sample heterogeneity supported using a scoping review method. After excluding nonrelated publications, 33 reports were fully reviewed. Twenty international publications were included that described ICU follow-up clinic interventions and/or outcomes. Results: Authors discussed very diverse interventions in 15 publications, and 9 reported some level of intervention effectiveness. Evidence was strongest that supported the use of prospective diaries as an intervention to prevent or improve psychological symptoms, whereas evidence to support implementation of other interventions was weak. Conclusions: Although ICU follow-up clinics exist, evidence for interventions and effectiveness of treatments in these clinics remains underexplored. Implications: Intensive care unit survivor follow-up clinics provide a venue for further interdisciplinary intervention research that could lead to better health outcomes for ICU survivors.",
keywords = "healthcare system, ICU follow-up clinic, ICU survivor follow-up clinics, intensive care survivors, scoping review",
author = "Sue Lasiter and Oles, {Sylwia K.} and James Mundell and Susan London and Babar Khan",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/NUR.0000000000000219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "227--237",
journal = "Clinical Nurse Specialist",
issn = "0887-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Care Follow-up Clinics

T2 - A Scoping Review of Interventions and Outcomes

AU - Lasiter, Sue

AU - Oles, Sylwia K.

AU - Mundell, James

AU - London, Susan

AU - Khan, Babar

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this scoping review is to identify evidence describing benefits of interventions provided in intensive care unit (ICU) survivor follow-up clinics. Background: Advances in ICU treatments have increased the number of survivors who require specialized care for ICU-related sequelae. Intensive care unit survivor follow-up clinics exist, yet little is known about the nature and impact of interventions provided in such clinics. A scoping review of publications about in-person post-ICU follow-up care was undertaken. Method: Ten databases were searched yielding 111 relevant unique publication titles and abstracts. Sample heterogeneity supported using a scoping review method. After excluding nonrelated publications, 33 reports were fully reviewed. Twenty international publications were included that described ICU follow-up clinic interventions and/or outcomes. Results: Authors discussed very diverse interventions in 15 publications, and 9 reported some level of intervention effectiveness. Evidence was strongest that supported the use of prospective diaries as an intervention to prevent or improve psychological symptoms, whereas evidence to support implementation of other interventions was weak. Conclusions: Although ICU follow-up clinics exist, evidence for interventions and effectiveness of treatments in these clinics remains underexplored. Implications: Intensive care unit survivor follow-up clinics provide a venue for further interdisciplinary intervention research that could lead to better health outcomes for ICU survivors.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this scoping review is to identify evidence describing benefits of interventions provided in intensive care unit (ICU) survivor follow-up clinics. Background: Advances in ICU treatments have increased the number of survivors who require specialized care for ICU-related sequelae. Intensive care unit survivor follow-up clinics exist, yet little is known about the nature and impact of interventions provided in such clinics. A scoping review of publications about in-person post-ICU follow-up care was undertaken. Method: Ten databases were searched yielding 111 relevant unique publication titles and abstracts. Sample heterogeneity supported using a scoping review method. After excluding nonrelated publications, 33 reports were fully reviewed. Twenty international publications were included that described ICU follow-up clinic interventions and/or outcomes. Results: Authors discussed very diverse interventions in 15 publications, and 9 reported some level of intervention effectiveness. Evidence was strongest that supported the use of prospective diaries as an intervention to prevent or improve psychological symptoms, whereas evidence to support implementation of other interventions was weak. Conclusions: Although ICU follow-up clinics exist, evidence for interventions and effectiveness of treatments in these clinics remains underexplored. Implications: Intensive care unit survivor follow-up clinics provide a venue for further interdisciplinary intervention research that could lead to better health outcomes for ICU survivors.

KW - healthcare system

KW - ICU follow-up clinic

KW - ICU survivor follow-up clinics

KW - intensive care survivors

KW - scoping review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975859987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975859987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000219

DO - 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000219

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 227

EP - 237

JO - Clinical Nurse Specialist

JF - Clinical Nurse Specialist

SN - 0887-6274

IS - 4

ER -