Cross sectional echocardiography in assessing the severity of valvular aortic stenosis

A. E. Weyman, Harvey Feigenbaum, J. C. Dillon, S. Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Real time, cross sectional echocardiograms were recorded in 28 consecutive adult patients with valvular aortic stenosis using a high resolution, mechanical sector scanner. Using the cross sectional technique, the aortic valve orifice diameter was recorded in each of the 28 patients. With M mode echocardiographic examination of these same patients, this value could be estimated in only 21 of these 28 patients (75%). The maximum aortic valve diameter recorded during the cross sectional study averaged 7.9 ± 1.8 mm (range 4-11 mm) in 15 patients with severe aortic stenosis; 11.6 ± 2.3 mm (range 9-15 mm) in five patients with moderate aortic stenosis; 16.9 ± 2.0 mm (range 14-20 mm) in eight patients with mild aortic stenosis; and 20.5 ± 2.8 mm (range 15-26 mm) in 25 patients with no evidence of aortic valve disease. Comparing the means of these groups yielded the following: severe vs moderate P < 0.005; moderate vs mild P < 0.001; and mild vs normal P < 0.001. Although there was some overlap between the individual groups, a clear separation existed between patients with severe and mild aortic stenosis. In addition, the group of patients in whom surgical intervention was recommended was also separated from the other subjects. When the aortic valve orifice was recorded using the M mode technique, there was also a good correlation with the severity of the stenosis; however, the tendency of the M mode study to overestimate severity in individual patients with calcific aortic stenosis and to underestimate severity in congenital aortic stenosis was again demonstrated. This study suggests that real time, high resolution, cross sectional echocardiography should be valuable in the noninvasive assessment of patients with aortic stenosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)828-834
Number of pages7
JournalCirculation
Volume52
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1975

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve Stenosis
Echocardiography
Aortic Valve
Aortic Diseases
Pathologic Constriction
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Cross sectional echocardiography in assessing the severity of valvular aortic stenosis. / Weyman, A. E.; Feigenbaum, Harvey; Dillon, J. C.; Chang, S.

In: Circulation, Vol. 52, No. 5, 1975, p. 828-834.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weyman, A. E. ; Feigenbaum, Harvey ; Dillon, J. C. ; Chang, S. / Cross sectional echocardiography in assessing the severity of valvular aortic stenosis. In: Circulation. 1975 ; Vol. 52, No. 5. pp. 828-834.
@article{45d0571290db463ba6ab2e2c61aba6cb,
title = "Cross sectional echocardiography in assessing the severity of valvular aortic stenosis",
abstract = "Real time, cross sectional echocardiograms were recorded in 28 consecutive adult patients with valvular aortic stenosis using a high resolution, mechanical sector scanner. Using the cross sectional technique, the aortic valve orifice diameter was recorded in each of the 28 patients. With M mode echocardiographic examination of these same patients, this value could be estimated in only 21 of these 28 patients (75{\%}). The maximum aortic valve diameter recorded during the cross sectional study averaged 7.9 ± 1.8 mm (range 4-11 mm) in 15 patients with severe aortic stenosis; 11.6 ± 2.3 mm (range 9-15 mm) in five patients with moderate aortic stenosis; 16.9 ± 2.0 mm (range 14-20 mm) in eight patients with mild aortic stenosis; and 20.5 ± 2.8 mm (range 15-26 mm) in 25 patients with no evidence of aortic valve disease. Comparing the means of these groups yielded the following: severe vs moderate P < 0.005; moderate vs mild P < 0.001; and mild vs normal P < 0.001. Although there was some overlap between the individual groups, a clear separation existed between patients with severe and mild aortic stenosis. In addition, the group of patients in whom surgical intervention was recommended was also separated from the other subjects. When the aortic valve orifice was recorded using the M mode technique, there was also a good correlation with the severity of the stenosis; however, the tendency of the M mode study to overestimate severity in individual patients with calcific aortic stenosis and to underestimate severity in congenital aortic stenosis was again demonstrated. This study suggests that real time, high resolution, cross sectional echocardiography should be valuable in the noninvasive assessment of patients with aortic stenosis.",
author = "Weyman, {A. E.} and Harvey Feigenbaum and Dillon, {J. C.} and S. Chang",
year = "1975",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "828--834",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross sectional echocardiography in assessing the severity of valvular aortic stenosis

AU - Weyman, A. E.

AU - Feigenbaum, Harvey

AU - Dillon, J. C.

AU - Chang, S.

PY - 1975

Y1 - 1975

N2 - Real time, cross sectional echocardiograms were recorded in 28 consecutive adult patients with valvular aortic stenosis using a high resolution, mechanical sector scanner. Using the cross sectional technique, the aortic valve orifice diameter was recorded in each of the 28 patients. With M mode echocardiographic examination of these same patients, this value could be estimated in only 21 of these 28 patients (75%). The maximum aortic valve diameter recorded during the cross sectional study averaged 7.9 ± 1.8 mm (range 4-11 mm) in 15 patients with severe aortic stenosis; 11.6 ± 2.3 mm (range 9-15 mm) in five patients with moderate aortic stenosis; 16.9 ± 2.0 mm (range 14-20 mm) in eight patients with mild aortic stenosis; and 20.5 ± 2.8 mm (range 15-26 mm) in 25 patients with no evidence of aortic valve disease. Comparing the means of these groups yielded the following: severe vs moderate P < 0.005; moderate vs mild P < 0.001; and mild vs normal P < 0.001. Although there was some overlap between the individual groups, a clear separation existed between patients with severe and mild aortic stenosis. In addition, the group of patients in whom surgical intervention was recommended was also separated from the other subjects. When the aortic valve orifice was recorded using the M mode technique, there was also a good correlation with the severity of the stenosis; however, the tendency of the M mode study to overestimate severity in individual patients with calcific aortic stenosis and to underestimate severity in congenital aortic stenosis was again demonstrated. This study suggests that real time, high resolution, cross sectional echocardiography should be valuable in the noninvasive assessment of patients with aortic stenosis.

AB - Real time, cross sectional echocardiograms were recorded in 28 consecutive adult patients with valvular aortic stenosis using a high resolution, mechanical sector scanner. Using the cross sectional technique, the aortic valve orifice diameter was recorded in each of the 28 patients. With M mode echocardiographic examination of these same patients, this value could be estimated in only 21 of these 28 patients (75%). The maximum aortic valve diameter recorded during the cross sectional study averaged 7.9 ± 1.8 mm (range 4-11 mm) in 15 patients with severe aortic stenosis; 11.6 ± 2.3 mm (range 9-15 mm) in five patients with moderate aortic stenosis; 16.9 ± 2.0 mm (range 14-20 mm) in eight patients with mild aortic stenosis; and 20.5 ± 2.8 mm (range 15-26 mm) in 25 patients with no evidence of aortic valve disease. Comparing the means of these groups yielded the following: severe vs moderate P < 0.005; moderate vs mild P < 0.001; and mild vs normal P < 0.001. Although there was some overlap between the individual groups, a clear separation existed between patients with severe and mild aortic stenosis. In addition, the group of patients in whom surgical intervention was recommended was also separated from the other subjects. When the aortic valve orifice was recorded using the M mode technique, there was also a good correlation with the severity of the stenosis; however, the tendency of the M mode study to overestimate severity in individual patients with calcific aortic stenosis and to underestimate severity in congenital aortic stenosis was again demonstrated. This study suggests that real time, high resolution, cross sectional echocardiography should be valuable in the noninvasive assessment of patients with aortic stenosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016817314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016817314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1175263

AN - SCOPUS:0016817314

VL - 52

SP - 828

EP - 834

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 5

ER -