Curing efficiency of three different curing lights at different distances for a hybrid composite

Song Zhu, Jeffrey Platt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of different curing distances with three types of lights in terms of the surface microhardness of a resin composite as a function of power density. Methods: 90 cylindrical light-cured resin composite specimens were polymerized with three light curing units: (a) Mini LED AutoFocus with a fast curing mode (1955 mW/cm2); (b) LEDemetron I (1541 mW/cm2) and (c) Optilux 401 QTH (1294 mW/cm2) for 40 seconds. Polymerization was performed with the curing tip at a distance of 0 mm, 3.0 mm, 6.0 mm, 9.0 mm, 12.0 mm and 15.0 mm from the top surface of the specimen. 15-25 minutes after photocuring, the top and bottom specimen's surface KHNs were determined. Microhardness values were measured again after 24-hour storage in distilled water in a light proof container at 37°C. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Multiple Comparisons with a Tukey test. The KHNs before and after storage in distilled water were analyzed using a paired t-test. Linear regression analysis was also performed and all statistical analyses were performed at a significance level of 0.05. Results: There was a linear relationship between the logarithm of the power density and the curing distance. The light curing unit and curing tip distance had a significant effect on the composite microhardness. Specimens cured with the Mini LED AutoFocus light provided higher KHNs than those photoactivated with the LEDemetron I light and Optilux 401 light. There was no statistically significant difference in KHNs between the LEDemetron I group and the Optilux 401 group. The mean Knoop microhardness values decreased significantly as the curing tip distance increased. Fifteen minutes after light cure, effective hardness percent values (> 80%) were achieved in a few experimental groups. A linear correlation was found between the logarithm of the power density and the hardness percent values. Twenty-four hours after light irradiation, most of the experimental groups obtained valid hardness percent values. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the KHN of both the top and bottom surfaces in most of the groups increased significantly. There were no significant increases in the mean relative hardness ratios related to surface or light curing device.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-386
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Dentistry
Volume22
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Light
Hardness
Composite Resins
Water
Polymerization
Linear Models
Analysis of Variance
Regression Analysis
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Curing efficiency of three different curing lights at different distances for a hybrid composite. / Zhu, Song; Platt, Jeffrey.

In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 22, No. 6, 12.2009, p. 381-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0817355e52414427900379b18172ff5d,
title = "Curing efficiency of three different curing lights at different distances for a hybrid composite",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the influence of different curing distances with three types of lights in terms of the surface microhardness of a resin composite as a function of power density. Methods: 90 cylindrical light-cured resin composite specimens were polymerized with three light curing units: (a) Mini LED AutoFocus with a fast curing mode (1955 mW/cm2); (b) LEDemetron I (1541 mW/cm2) and (c) Optilux 401 QTH (1294 mW/cm2) for 40 seconds. Polymerization was performed with the curing tip at a distance of 0 mm, 3.0 mm, 6.0 mm, 9.0 mm, 12.0 mm and 15.0 mm from the top surface of the specimen. 15-25 minutes after photocuring, the top and bottom specimen's surface KHNs were determined. Microhardness values were measured again after 24-hour storage in distilled water in a light proof container at 37°C. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Multiple Comparisons with a Tukey test. The KHNs before and after storage in distilled water were analyzed using a paired t-test. Linear regression analysis was also performed and all statistical analyses were performed at a significance level of 0.05. Results: There was a linear relationship between the logarithm of the power density and the curing distance. The light curing unit and curing tip distance had a significant effect on the composite microhardness. Specimens cured with the Mini LED AutoFocus light provided higher KHNs than those photoactivated with the LEDemetron I light and Optilux 401 light. There was no statistically significant difference in KHNs between the LEDemetron I group and the Optilux 401 group. The mean Knoop microhardness values decreased significantly as the curing tip distance increased. Fifteen minutes after light cure, effective hardness percent values (> 80{\%}) were achieved in a few experimental groups. A linear correlation was found between the logarithm of the power density and the hardness percent values. Twenty-four hours after light irradiation, most of the experimental groups obtained valid hardness percent values. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the KHN of both the top and bottom surfaces in most of the groups increased significantly. There were no significant increases in the mean relative hardness ratios related to surface or light curing device.",
author = "Song Zhu and Jeffrey Platt",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "381--386",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Curing efficiency of three different curing lights at different distances for a hybrid composite

AU - Zhu, Song

AU - Platt, Jeffrey

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the influence of different curing distances with three types of lights in terms of the surface microhardness of a resin composite as a function of power density. Methods: 90 cylindrical light-cured resin composite specimens were polymerized with three light curing units: (a) Mini LED AutoFocus with a fast curing mode (1955 mW/cm2); (b) LEDemetron I (1541 mW/cm2) and (c) Optilux 401 QTH (1294 mW/cm2) for 40 seconds. Polymerization was performed with the curing tip at a distance of 0 mm, 3.0 mm, 6.0 mm, 9.0 mm, 12.0 mm and 15.0 mm from the top surface of the specimen. 15-25 minutes after photocuring, the top and bottom specimen's surface KHNs were determined. Microhardness values were measured again after 24-hour storage in distilled water in a light proof container at 37°C. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Multiple Comparisons with a Tukey test. The KHNs before and after storage in distilled water were analyzed using a paired t-test. Linear regression analysis was also performed and all statistical analyses were performed at a significance level of 0.05. Results: There was a linear relationship between the logarithm of the power density and the curing distance. The light curing unit and curing tip distance had a significant effect on the composite microhardness. Specimens cured with the Mini LED AutoFocus light provided higher KHNs than those photoactivated with the LEDemetron I light and Optilux 401 light. There was no statistically significant difference in KHNs between the LEDemetron I group and the Optilux 401 group. The mean Knoop microhardness values decreased significantly as the curing tip distance increased. Fifteen minutes after light cure, effective hardness percent values (> 80%) were achieved in a few experimental groups. A linear correlation was found between the logarithm of the power density and the hardness percent values. Twenty-four hours after light irradiation, most of the experimental groups obtained valid hardness percent values. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the KHN of both the top and bottom surfaces in most of the groups increased significantly. There were no significant increases in the mean relative hardness ratios related to surface or light curing device.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the influence of different curing distances with three types of lights in terms of the surface microhardness of a resin composite as a function of power density. Methods: 90 cylindrical light-cured resin composite specimens were polymerized with three light curing units: (a) Mini LED AutoFocus with a fast curing mode (1955 mW/cm2); (b) LEDemetron I (1541 mW/cm2) and (c) Optilux 401 QTH (1294 mW/cm2) for 40 seconds. Polymerization was performed with the curing tip at a distance of 0 mm, 3.0 mm, 6.0 mm, 9.0 mm, 12.0 mm and 15.0 mm from the top surface of the specimen. 15-25 minutes after photocuring, the top and bottom specimen's surface KHNs were determined. Microhardness values were measured again after 24-hour storage in distilled water in a light proof container at 37°C. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Multiple Comparisons with a Tukey test. The KHNs before and after storage in distilled water were analyzed using a paired t-test. Linear regression analysis was also performed and all statistical analyses were performed at a significance level of 0.05. Results: There was a linear relationship between the logarithm of the power density and the curing distance. The light curing unit and curing tip distance had a significant effect on the composite microhardness. Specimens cured with the Mini LED AutoFocus light provided higher KHNs than those photoactivated with the LEDemetron I light and Optilux 401 light. There was no statistically significant difference in KHNs between the LEDemetron I group and the Optilux 401 group. The mean Knoop microhardness values decreased significantly as the curing tip distance increased. Fifteen minutes after light cure, effective hardness percent values (> 80%) were achieved in a few experimental groups. A linear correlation was found between the logarithm of the power density and the hardness percent values. Twenty-four hours after light irradiation, most of the experimental groups obtained valid hardness percent values. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the KHN of both the top and bottom surfaces in most of the groups increased significantly. There were no significant increases in the mean relative hardness ratios related to surface or light curing device.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77749289458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77749289458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20178217

AN - SCOPUS:77749289458

VL - 22

SP - 381

EP - 386

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 6

ER -