Cytomorphologic comparison of type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of 28 cases

Martin J. Magers, Carmen M. Perrino, Harvey Cramer, Howard Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is classified as type 1 or type 2 on the basis of histomorphologic features. Type 1 pRCC typically carries a better prognosis, and renal cell carcinoma is often diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Thus, this study was designed to characterize cytomorphologic features present in FNA cases that could be used to discriminate between type 1 and type 2 pRCC. Methods: Electronic records of Indiana University were searched for pRCC FNA cases (2007-2018). Corresponding surgical pathology reports were reviewed to classify patients as having type 1 or type 2 pRCC. FNA slides were reviewed to assess cytomorphologic features (ie, nuclear grade; cell size; cytoplasmic volume and quality; and the presence of single cells, papillary clusters, nuclear grooves, foamy histiocytes, hemosiderin pigment, psammoma bodies, and hyaline globules). A semiquantitative score was assigned to each feature. The nuclear grade was assigned with the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading system. The cytomorphologic features of type 1 and type 2 pRCC were compared. Results: Sixteen patients with type 1 pRCC and 12 patients with type 2 pRCC were included in the study. Type 2 pRCC had a higher nuclear grade, a higher volume of cytoplasm, and more granular cytoplasm. Type 1 pRCC more frequently had nuclear grooves and clear cytoplasm. The remaining features (ie, cell size, papillary clusters, single cells, foamy histiocytes, hemosiderin pigment, psammoma bodies, and hyaline globules) were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Nuclear grade, cytoplasmic volume and granularity or clarity, and nuclear grooves are cytomorphologic features that may aid in the distinction between type 1 and type 2 pRCC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCancer Cytopathology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Renal Cell Carcinoma
Fine Needle Biopsy
Hemosiderin
Cytoplasm
Hyalin
Histiocytes
Cell Size
Surgical Pathology
Pathology

Keywords

  • cytology
  • fine-needle aspiration
  • kidney
  • papillary renal cell carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Cytomorphologic comparison of type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma : A retrospective analysis of 28 cases. / Magers, Martin J.; Perrino, Carmen M.; Cramer, Harvey; Wu, Howard.

In: Cancer Cytopathology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6fa95da0baad47ef9b59ebabc6629d6a,
title = "Cytomorphologic comparison of type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of 28 cases",
abstract = "Background: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is classified as type 1 or type 2 on the basis of histomorphologic features. Type 1 pRCC typically carries a better prognosis, and renal cell carcinoma is often diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Thus, this study was designed to characterize cytomorphologic features present in FNA cases that could be used to discriminate between type 1 and type 2 pRCC. Methods: Electronic records of Indiana University were searched for pRCC FNA cases (2007-2018). Corresponding surgical pathology reports were reviewed to classify patients as having type 1 or type 2 pRCC. FNA slides were reviewed to assess cytomorphologic features (ie, nuclear grade; cell size; cytoplasmic volume and quality; and the presence of single cells, papillary clusters, nuclear grooves, foamy histiocytes, hemosiderin pigment, psammoma bodies, and hyaline globules). A semiquantitative score was assigned to each feature. The nuclear grade was assigned with the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading system. The cytomorphologic features of type 1 and type 2 pRCC were compared. Results: Sixteen patients with type 1 pRCC and 12 patients with type 2 pRCC were included in the study. Type 2 pRCC had a higher nuclear grade, a higher volume of cytoplasm, and more granular cytoplasm. Type 1 pRCC more frequently had nuclear grooves and clear cytoplasm. The remaining features (ie, cell size, papillary clusters, single cells, foamy histiocytes, hemosiderin pigment, psammoma bodies, and hyaline globules) were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Nuclear grade, cytoplasmic volume and granularity or clarity, and nuclear grooves are cytomorphologic features that may aid in the distinction between type 1 and type 2 pRCC.",
keywords = "cytology, fine-needle aspiration, kidney, papillary renal cell carcinoma",
author = "Magers, {Martin J.} and Perrino, {Carmen M.} and Harvey Cramer and Howard Wu",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/cncy.22146",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Cancer cytopathology",
issn = "1934-662X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cytomorphologic comparison of type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma

T2 - A retrospective analysis of 28 cases

AU - Magers, Martin J.

AU - Perrino, Carmen M.

AU - Cramer, Harvey

AU - Wu, Howard

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is classified as type 1 or type 2 on the basis of histomorphologic features. Type 1 pRCC typically carries a better prognosis, and renal cell carcinoma is often diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Thus, this study was designed to characterize cytomorphologic features present in FNA cases that could be used to discriminate between type 1 and type 2 pRCC. Methods: Electronic records of Indiana University were searched for pRCC FNA cases (2007-2018). Corresponding surgical pathology reports were reviewed to classify patients as having type 1 or type 2 pRCC. FNA slides were reviewed to assess cytomorphologic features (ie, nuclear grade; cell size; cytoplasmic volume and quality; and the presence of single cells, papillary clusters, nuclear grooves, foamy histiocytes, hemosiderin pigment, psammoma bodies, and hyaline globules). A semiquantitative score was assigned to each feature. The nuclear grade was assigned with the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading system. The cytomorphologic features of type 1 and type 2 pRCC were compared. Results: Sixteen patients with type 1 pRCC and 12 patients with type 2 pRCC were included in the study. Type 2 pRCC had a higher nuclear grade, a higher volume of cytoplasm, and more granular cytoplasm. Type 1 pRCC more frequently had nuclear grooves and clear cytoplasm. The remaining features (ie, cell size, papillary clusters, single cells, foamy histiocytes, hemosiderin pigment, psammoma bodies, and hyaline globules) were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Nuclear grade, cytoplasmic volume and granularity or clarity, and nuclear grooves are cytomorphologic features that may aid in the distinction between type 1 and type 2 pRCC.

AB - Background: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is classified as type 1 or type 2 on the basis of histomorphologic features. Type 1 pRCC typically carries a better prognosis, and renal cell carcinoma is often diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Thus, this study was designed to characterize cytomorphologic features present in FNA cases that could be used to discriminate between type 1 and type 2 pRCC. Methods: Electronic records of Indiana University were searched for pRCC FNA cases (2007-2018). Corresponding surgical pathology reports were reviewed to classify patients as having type 1 or type 2 pRCC. FNA slides were reviewed to assess cytomorphologic features (ie, nuclear grade; cell size; cytoplasmic volume and quality; and the presence of single cells, papillary clusters, nuclear grooves, foamy histiocytes, hemosiderin pigment, psammoma bodies, and hyaline globules). A semiquantitative score was assigned to each feature. The nuclear grade was assigned with the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading system. The cytomorphologic features of type 1 and type 2 pRCC were compared. Results: Sixteen patients with type 1 pRCC and 12 patients with type 2 pRCC were included in the study. Type 2 pRCC had a higher nuclear grade, a higher volume of cytoplasm, and more granular cytoplasm. Type 1 pRCC more frequently had nuclear grooves and clear cytoplasm. The remaining features (ie, cell size, papillary clusters, single cells, foamy histiocytes, hemosiderin pigment, psammoma bodies, and hyaline globules) were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Nuclear grade, cytoplasmic volume and granularity or clarity, and nuclear grooves are cytomorphologic features that may aid in the distinction between type 1 and type 2 pRCC.

KW - cytology

KW - fine-needle aspiration

KW - kidney

KW - papillary renal cell carcinoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065964182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065964182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cncy.22146

DO - 10.1002/cncy.22146

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065964182

JO - Cancer cytopathology

JF - Cancer cytopathology

SN - 1934-662X

ER -