Data Quality at the Indiana State Cancer Registry

An Evaluation of Timeliness by Cancer Type and Year

Abdulrahman M. Jabour, Brian Dixon, Josette F. Jones, David Haggstrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central cancer registries collect tumor-related data to monitor incidence rates and support population- based research. One concern with using registry data for research is timeliness of reporting. Timeliness has been recognized as an important data characteristic by both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Academy of Medicine. Yet, few studies in the United States have systematically measured timeliness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate timeliness in cancer-case reporting to a state population-based cancer registry. METHOD: Using the Indiana State Department of Health Cancer Registry, 66,395 breast, colorectal, and lung cancer diagnoses recorded during the years 2001–2009 were examined for timeliness. Timeliness was measured from the date the cancer was diagnosed to when the data were available at the state registry. Differences over time and among the 3 cancer types were examined. RESULT: Timeliness of reporting improved since 2003. Mean reporting time ranged from 426 days in 2003 to 253 days in 2009. We found significant difference in reporting time between the 3 cancer types. CONCLUSION: Timeliness of reporting has improved over time. Advances in health information technologies may have contributed to this improvement. However, achieving even more timely reporting for research purposes and care intervention may require moving away from traditional reporting methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-173
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of registry management
Volume43
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Registries
Neoplasms
Research
Medical Informatics
Data Accuracy
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Population
Colorectal Neoplasms
Lung Neoplasms
Medicine
Breast Neoplasms
Incidence
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Data Quality at the Indiana State Cancer Registry : An Evaluation of Timeliness by Cancer Type and Year. / Jabour, Abdulrahman M.; Dixon, Brian; Jones, Josette F.; Haggstrom, David.

In: Journal of registry management, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 168-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{224ee257a7af47059ff35107335d97e4,
title = "Data Quality at the Indiana State Cancer Registry: An Evaluation of Timeliness by Cancer Type and Year",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Central cancer registries collect tumor-related data to monitor incidence rates and support population- based research. One concern with using registry data for research is timeliness of reporting. Timeliness has been recognized as an important data characteristic by both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Academy of Medicine. Yet, few studies in the United States have systematically measured timeliness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate timeliness in cancer-case reporting to a state population-based cancer registry. METHOD: Using the Indiana State Department of Health Cancer Registry, 66,395 breast, colorectal, and lung cancer diagnoses recorded during the years 2001–2009 were examined for timeliness. Timeliness was measured from the date the cancer was diagnosed to when the data were available at the state registry. Differences over time and among the 3 cancer types were examined. RESULT: Timeliness of reporting improved since 2003. Mean reporting time ranged from 426 days in 2003 to 253 days in 2009. We found significant difference in reporting time between the 3 cancer types. CONCLUSION: Timeliness of reporting has improved over time. Advances in health information technologies may have contributed to this improvement. However, achieving even more timely reporting for research purposes and care intervention may require moving away from traditional reporting methods.",
author = "Jabour, {Abdulrahman M.} and Brian Dixon and Jones, {Josette F.} and David Haggstrom",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "168--173",
journal = "Journal of registry management",
issn = "1945-6123",
publisher = "National Cancer Registrars Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data Quality at the Indiana State Cancer Registry

T2 - An Evaluation of Timeliness by Cancer Type and Year

AU - Jabour, Abdulrahman M.

AU - Dixon, Brian

AU - Jones, Josette F.

AU - Haggstrom, David

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Central cancer registries collect tumor-related data to monitor incidence rates and support population- based research. One concern with using registry data for research is timeliness of reporting. Timeliness has been recognized as an important data characteristic by both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Academy of Medicine. Yet, few studies in the United States have systematically measured timeliness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate timeliness in cancer-case reporting to a state population-based cancer registry. METHOD: Using the Indiana State Department of Health Cancer Registry, 66,395 breast, colorectal, and lung cancer diagnoses recorded during the years 2001–2009 were examined for timeliness. Timeliness was measured from the date the cancer was diagnosed to when the data were available at the state registry. Differences over time and among the 3 cancer types were examined. RESULT: Timeliness of reporting improved since 2003. Mean reporting time ranged from 426 days in 2003 to 253 days in 2009. We found significant difference in reporting time between the 3 cancer types. CONCLUSION: Timeliness of reporting has improved over time. Advances in health information technologies may have contributed to this improvement. However, achieving even more timely reporting for research purposes and care intervention may require moving away from traditional reporting methods.

AB - BACKGROUND: Central cancer registries collect tumor-related data to monitor incidence rates and support population- based research. One concern with using registry data for research is timeliness of reporting. Timeliness has been recognized as an important data characteristic by both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Academy of Medicine. Yet, few studies in the United States have systematically measured timeliness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate timeliness in cancer-case reporting to a state population-based cancer registry. METHOD: Using the Indiana State Department of Health Cancer Registry, 66,395 breast, colorectal, and lung cancer diagnoses recorded during the years 2001–2009 were examined for timeliness. Timeliness was measured from the date the cancer was diagnosed to when the data were available at the state registry. Differences over time and among the 3 cancer types were examined. RESULT: Timeliness of reporting improved since 2003. Mean reporting time ranged from 426 days in 2003 to 253 days in 2009. We found significant difference in reporting time between the 3 cancer types. CONCLUSION: Timeliness of reporting has improved over time. Advances in health information technologies may have contributed to this improvement. However, achieving even more timely reporting for research purposes and care intervention may require moving away from traditional reporting methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046283108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046283108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 168

EP - 173

JO - Journal of registry management

JF - Journal of registry management

SN - 1945-6123

IS - 4

ER -