Data sharing between local health and state health departments

Developing and describing a typology of data gaps

Joshua Vest, L. Michele Issel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Local health departments (LHDs) and state health agencies (SHAs) require quantitative data to fulfill their obligation to ensure public health. However, data collection and sharing are not straightforward processes in the US public health system. Responsibilities are divided among many actors, jurisdictions overlap, events that can occur elsewhere, and not every public health agency possesses information systems capable of sharing data. Collectively, these characteristics define a system that likely has gaps in data sharing among public health entities. OBJECTIVE: A data-sharing gap is the inability to transmit, in near real time, data among public health agencies within a state for a specific public health activity. This article presents theoretically and empirically based typology of data-sharing gaps between LHDs and SHAs and describes the extent of data-sharing types for 6 activities. DESIGN, SETTING AND MAIN OUTCOME: Drawing on concepts from network theory, public health responsibilities, and technological capacity, we conceptualize a 9-category data-sharing typology that characterizes the flow of data between SHAs and LHDs. Using existing organizational surveys, we created a sample of LHD-SHA exchange dyads, which we use to describe the distribution of sharing and gaps for immunizations, vital records, reportable conditions, laboratory, well water, and electronic health records. State-level maps describe the prevalence of data-sharing gaps nationwide. RESULTS: For vital records, reportable conditions, and well-water assessments, gaps in data sharing were the norm. For the other 3 public health activities, a lower portion of the dyads experienced gaps, but gaps were still very common. Most troubling was the relatively infrequent occurrence of truly bidirectional information sharing. CONCLUSIONS: The data-sharing typology provides a useful basis for the formulations of policies to improve public health information systems and to guide future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-365
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Information Dissemination
Public Health
Health
Health Information Systems
Water
Electronic Health Records
Information Systems
Immunization

Keywords

  • Computer communication networks
  • Information systems
  • Organization and administration
  • Public health informatics
  • Public health practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Data sharing between local health and state health departments : Developing and describing a typology of data gaps. / Vest, Joshua; Issel, L. Michele.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.07.2013, p. 357-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6519c88f3b07416b9a72745140f1962c,
title = "Data sharing between local health and state health departments: Developing and describing a typology of data gaps",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Local health departments (LHDs) and state health agencies (SHAs) require quantitative data to fulfill their obligation to ensure public health. However, data collection and sharing are not straightforward processes in the US public health system. Responsibilities are divided among many actors, jurisdictions overlap, events that can occur elsewhere, and not every public health agency possesses information systems capable of sharing data. Collectively, these characteristics define a system that likely has gaps in data sharing among public health entities. OBJECTIVE: A data-sharing gap is the inability to transmit, in near real time, data among public health agencies within a state for a specific public health activity. This article presents theoretically and empirically based typology of data-sharing gaps between LHDs and SHAs and describes the extent of data-sharing types for 6 activities. DESIGN, SETTING AND MAIN OUTCOME: Drawing on concepts from network theory, public health responsibilities, and technological capacity, we conceptualize a 9-category data-sharing typology that characterizes the flow of data between SHAs and LHDs. Using existing organizational surveys, we created a sample of LHD-SHA exchange dyads, which we use to describe the distribution of sharing and gaps for immunizations, vital records, reportable conditions, laboratory, well water, and electronic health records. State-level maps describe the prevalence of data-sharing gaps nationwide. RESULTS: For vital records, reportable conditions, and well-water assessments, gaps in data sharing were the norm. For the other 3 public health activities, a lower portion of the dyads experienced gaps, but gaps were still very common. Most troubling was the relatively infrequent occurrence of truly bidirectional information sharing. CONCLUSIONS: The data-sharing typology provides a useful basis for the formulations of policies to improve public health information systems and to guide future research.",
keywords = "Computer communication networks, Information systems, Organization and administration, Public health informatics, Public health practice",
author = "Joshua Vest and Issel, {L. Michele}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e31826d8045",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "357--365",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data sharing between local health and state health departments

T2 - Developing and describing a typology of data gaps

AU - Vest, Joshua

AU - Issel, L. Michele

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - CONTEXT: Local health departments (LHDs) and state health agencies (SHAs) require quantitative data to fulfill their obligation to ensure public health. However, data collection and sharing are not straightforward processes in the US public health system. Responsibilities are divided among many actors, jurisdictions overlap, events that can occur elsewhere, and not every public health agency possesses information systems capable of sharing data. Collectively, these characteristics define a system that likely has gaps in data sharing among public health entities. OBJECTIVE: A data-sharing gap is the inability to transmit, in near real time, data among public health agencies within a state for a specific public health activity. This article presents theoretically and empirically based typology of data-sharing gaps between LHDs and SHAs and describes the extent of data-sharing types for 6 activities. DESIGN, SETTING AND MAIN OUTCOME: Drawing on concepts from network theory, public health responsibilities, and technological capacity, we conceptualize a 9-category data-sharing typology that characterizes the flow of data between SHAs and LHDs. Using existing organizational surveys, we created a sample of LHD-SHA exchange dyads, which we use to describe the distribution of sharing and gaps for immunizations, vital records, reportable conditions, laboratory, well water, and electronic health records. State-level maps describe the prevalence of data-sharing gaps nationwide. RESULTS: For vital records, reportable conditions, and well-water assessments, gaps in data sharing were the norm. For the other 3 public health activities, a lower portion of the dyads experienced gaps, but gaps were still very common. Most troubling was the relatively infrequent occurrence of truly bidirectional information sharing. CONCLUSIONS: The data-sharing typology provides a useful basis for the formulations of policies to improve public health information systems and to guide future research.

AB - CONTEXT: Local health departments (LHDs) and state health agencies (SHAs) require quantitative data to fulfill their obligation to ensure public health. However, data collection and sharing are not straightforward processes in the US public health system. Responsibilities are divided among many actors, jurisdictions overlap, events that can occur elsewhere, and not every public health agency possesses information systems capable of sharing data. Collectively, these characteristics define a system that likely has gaps in data sharing among public health entities. OBJECTIVE: A data-sharing gap is the inability to transmit, in near real time, data among public health agencies within a state for a specific public health activity. This article presents theoretically and empirically based typology of data-sharing gaps between LHDs and SHAs and describes the extent of data-sharing types for 6 activities. DESIGN, SETTING AND MAIN OUTCOME: Drawing on concepts from network theory, public health responsibilities, and technological capacity, we conceptualize a 9-category data-sharing typology that characterizes the flow of data between SHAs and LHDs. Using existing organizational surveys, we created a sample of LHD-SHA exchange dyads, which we use to describe the distribution of sharing and gaps for immunizations, vital records, reportable conditions, laboratory, well water, and electronic health records. State-level maps describe the prevalence of data-sharing gaps nationwide. RESULTS: For vital records, reportable conditions, and well-water assessments, gaps in data sharing were the norm. For the other 3 public health activities, a lower portion of the dyads experienced gaps, but gaps were still very common. Most troubling was the relatively infrequent occurrence of truly bidirectional information sharing. CONCLUSIONS: The data-sharing typology provides a useful basis for the formulations of policies to improve public health information systems and to guide future research.

KW - Computer communication networks

KW - Information systems

KW - Organization and administration

KW - Public health informatics

KW - Public health practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880106228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880106228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31826d8045

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31826d8045

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 357

EP - 365

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 4

ER -