Defibrillating shocks delivered to the heart impair efferent sympathetic responsiveness

Makoto Ito, Harald P. Pride, Douglas P. Zipes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Functional studies indicate that sympathetic efferents are located in the superficial subepicardium and vagal efferents are located in the subendocardium. It is possible that electrical shocks applied directly to the heart might affect the function of these autonomic nerves. Methods and Results. Low- (≤1 J), medium- (6 to 16 J), or high- (30 to 35 J) energy truncated monophasic exponential shocks, synchronized to the R wave during sinus rhythm, were delivered over implantable patches sutured inside the pericardium in anesthetized open-chest dogs. Shortening of ventricular effective refractory period (ERP), produced by bilateral ansae subclaviae stimulation (SS), was measured before and after shock delivery. High-energy shocks shifted the SS frequency-ERP response curves downward and to the right (P<.001) for sites beneath and apical to the patches; ERP shortening at basal sites remained unchanged. Such sympathetic attenuation occurred with shocks >10 J but not with shocks ≤10 J, was noted 15 minutes after the shock, and showed incomplete return to control values at 3 hours. Neither low- nor high-energy shocks affected norepinephrine dose-ERP response curves, indicating normal myocardial responsiveness. Low- and high-energy shocks did not attenuate bilateral cervical vagal stimulation-induced ERP prolongation. High-energy shocks delivered over patches sutured to the outside of the pericardium showed no effects on sympathetic response, suggesting a protective effect of the pericardium against shock-induced sympathetic attenuation. Conclusions. DC shocks >10 J delivered directly to the epicardium attenuated efferent sympathetic neural function. Such changes may affect electrophysiological, as well as hemodynamic, responses to sympathetic neural stimulation after cardioversion-defibrillation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2661-2673
Number of pages13
JournalCirculation
Volume88
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1993

Fingerprint

Shock
Pericardium
Autonomic Pathways
Electric Countershock
Norepinephrine
Thorax
Hemodynamics
Dogs

Keywords

  • Autonomic neural function
  • DC shock
  • Effective refractory period
  • Electrodes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Defibrillating shocks delivered to the heart impair efferent sympathetic responsiveness. / Ito, Makoto; Pride, Harald P.; Zipes, Douglas P.

In: Circulation, Vol. 88, No. 6, 12.1993, p. 2661-2673.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ito, Makoto ; Pride, Harald P. ; Zipes, Douglas P. / Defibrillating shocks delivered to the heart impair efferent sympathetic responsiveness. In: Circulation. 1993 ; Vol. 88, No. 6. pp. 2661-2673.
@article{096e25dc5f6c4556a28c1072965441cc,
title = "Defibrillating shocks delivered to the heart impair efferent sympathetic responsiveness",
abstract = "Background. Functional studies indicate that sympathetic efferents are located in the superficial subepicardium and vagal efferents are located in the subendocardium. It is possible that electrical shocks applied directly to the heart might affect the function of these autonomic nerves. Methods and Results. Low- (≤1 J), medium- (6 to 16 J), or high- (30 to 35 J) energy truncated monophasic exponential shocks, synchronized to the R wave during sinus rhythm, were delivered over implantable patches sutured inside the pericardium in anesthetized open-chest dogs. Shortening of ventricular effective refractory period (ERP), produced by bilateral ansae subclaviae stimulation (SS), was measured before and after shock delivery. High-energy shocks shifted the SS frequency-ERP response curves downward and to the right (P<.001) for sites beneath and apical to the patches; ERP shortening at basal sites remained unchanged. Such sympathetic attenuation occurred with shocks >10 J but not with shocks ≤10 J, was noted 15 minutes after the shock, and showed incomplete return to control values at 3 hours. Neither low- nor high-energy shocks affected norepinephrine dose-ERP response curves, indicating normal myocardial responsiveness. Low- and high-energy shocks did not attenuate bilateral cervical vagal stimulation-induced ERP prolongation. High-energy shocks delivered over patches sutured to the outside of the pericardium showed no effects on sympathetic response, suggesting a protective effect of the pericardium against shock-induced sympathetic attenuation. Conclusions. DC shocks >10 J delivered directly to the epicardium attenuated efferent sympathetic neural function. Such changes may affect electrophysiological, as well as hemodynamic, responses to sympathetic neural stimulation after cardioversion-defibrillation.",
keywords = "Autonomic neural function, DC shock, Effective refractory period, Electrodes",
author = "Makoto Ito and Pride, {Harald P.} and Zipes, {Douglas P.}",
year = "1993",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1161/01.CIR.88.6.2661",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "2661--2673",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defibrillating shocks delivered to the heart impair efferent sympathetic responsiveness

AU - Ito, Makoto

AU - Pride, Harald P.

AU - Zipes, Douglas P.

PY - 1993/12

Y1 - 1993/12

N2 - Background. Functional studies indicate that sympathetic efferents are located in the superficial subepicardium and vagal efferents are located in the subendocardium. It is possible that electrical shocks applied directly to the heart might affect the function of these autonomic nerves. Methods and Results. Low- (≤1 J), medium- (6 to 16 J), or high- (30 to 35 J) energy truncated monophasic exponential shocks, synchronized to the R wave during sinus rhythm, were delivered over implantable patches sutured inside the pericardium in anesthetized open-chest dogs. Shortening of ventricular effective refractory period (ERP), produced by bilateral ansae subclaviae stimulation (SS), was measured before and after shock delivery. High-energy shocks shifted the SS frequency-ERP response curves downward and to the right (P<.001) for sites beneath and apical to the patches; ERP shortening at basal sites remained unchanged. Such sympathetic attenuation occurred with shocks >10 J but not with shocks ≤10 J, was noted 15 minutes after the shock, and showed incomplete return to control values at 3 hours. Neither low- nor high-energy shocks affected norepinephrine dose-ERP response curves, indicating normal myocardial responsiveness. Low- and high-energy shocks did not attenuate bilateral cervical vagal stimulation-induced ERP prolongation. High-energy shocks delivered over patches sutured to the outside of the pericardium showed no effects on sympathetic response, suggesting a protective effect of the pericardium against shock-induced sympathetic attenuation. Conclusions. DC shocks >10 J delivered directly to the epicardium attenuated efferent sympathetic neural function. Such changes may affect electrophysiological, as well as hemodynamic, responses to sympathetic neural stimulation after cardioversion-defibrillation.

AB - Background. Functional studies indicate that sympathetic efferents are located in the superficial subepicardium and vagal efferents are located in the subendocardium. It is possible that electrical shocks applied directly to the heart might affect the function of these autonomic nerves. Methods and Results. Low- (≤1 J), medium- (6 to 16 J), or high- (30 to 35 J) energy truncated monophasic exponential shocks, synchronized to the R wave during sinus rhythm, were delivered over implantable patches sutured inside the pericardium in anesthetized open-chest dogs. Shortening of ventricular effective refractory period (ERP), produced by bilateral ansae subclaviae stimulation (SS), was measured before and after shock delivery. High-energy shocks shifted the SS frequency-ERP response curves downward and to the right (P<.001) for sites beneath and apical to the patches; ERP shortening at basal sites remained unchanged. Such sympathetic attenuation occurred with shocks >10 J but not with shocks ≤10 J, was noted 15 minutes after the shock, and showed incomplete return to control values at 3 hours. Neither low- nor high-energy shocks affected norepinephrine dose-ERP response curves, indicating normal myocardial responsiveness. Low- and high-energy shocks did not attenuate bilateral cervical vagal stimulation-induced ERP prolongation. High-energy shocks delivered over patches sutured to the outside of the pericardium showed no effects on sympathetic response, suggesting a protective effect of the pericardium against shock-induced sympathetic attenuation. Conclusions. DC shocks >10 J delivered directly to the epicardium attenuated efferent sympathetic neural function. Such changes may affect electrophysiological, as well as hemodynamic, responses to sympathetic neural stimulation after cardioversion-defibrillation.

KW - Autonomic neural function

KW - DC shock

KW - Effective refractory period

KW - Electrodes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027364702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027364702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/01.CIR.88.6.2661

DO - 10.1161/01.CIR.88.6.2661

M3 - Article

C2 - 8252677

AN - SCOPUS:0027364702

VL - 88

SP - 2661

EP - 2673

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 6

ER -