Describing care coordination of gynecologic oncology in western healthcare settings: A rapid review

Sean Grant, Aneesa Motala, Joya G. Chrystal, Roberta Shanman, Jessica Zuchowski, Laurie Zephyrin, Kristina M. Cordasco

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Caring for women with gynecologic malignancies requires multidisciplinary communication and coordination across multiple providers. This article discusses a rapid review of the literature on characteristics of care coordination for gynecologic malignancies. Five electronic databases (from inception through March 2015) were searched for empirical studies on coordinated care models for female adults with gynecologic malignancies. A single reviewer extracted and synthesized information on how care was coordinated, how care teams made decisions, who performed what tasks, how care teams communicated information to coordinate care, and potential impact of the characteristic on delivering coordinated care. From 26 included studies, predominant characteristics of coordinated care were identified: multidisciplinary teams, patient navigators, scheduled follow-ups, survivorship care plans, and colocated services. Decision-making was best documented for studies that utilized teams that had periodic scheduled meetings with set agendas and consistent procedures. Providers' roles in coordinating care were numerous, reflecting professional backgrounds: oncologists had most authority in making treatment decisions; radiologists and pathologists shared vital biomedical information; and nurses coordinated care and communicated with patients. Communication tools and strategies across studies included having shared medical records, integrated treatment plans, and telephone-based or teleconferencing communication. There was limited information available on the impact of characteristics and accompanying strategies or tools. Several characteristics of care coordination models for gynecologic cancers have been published in the literature. Further investigation is needed to understand the relative effectiveness of these ways to coordinate care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)409-418
Number of pages10
JournalTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 23 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Neoplasms
Decision Making
Patient Navigation
Interdisciplinary Communication
Communication
Aftercare
Telephone
Medical Records
Survival Rate
Nurses
Databases
Therapeutics
Pathologists
Radiologists
Oncologists

Keywords

  • Coordinated care
  • Gynecologic cancer
  • Rapid review
  • Women's health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Grant, S., Motala, A., Chrystal, J. G., Shanman, R., Zuchowski, J., Zephyrin, L., & Cordasco, K. M. (2018). Describing care coordination of gynecologic oncology in western healthcare settings: A rapid review. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 8(3), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx074

Describing care coordination of gynecologic oncology in western healthcare settings : A rapid review. / Grant, Sean; Motala, Aneesa; Chrystal, Joya G.; Shanman, Roberta; Zuchowski, Jessica; Zephyrin, Laurie; Cordasco, Kristina M.

In: Translational Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 3, 23.05.2018, p. 409-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Grant, S, Motala, A, Chrystal, JG, Shanman, R, Zuchowski, J, Zephyrin, L & Cordasco, KM 2018, 'Describing care coordination of gynecologic oncology in western healthcare settings: A rapid review', Translational Behavioral Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx074
Grant, Sean ; Motala, Aneesa ; Chrystal, Joya G. ; Shanman, Roberta ; Zuchowski, Jessica ; Zephyrin, Laurie ; Cordasco, Kristina M. / Describing care coordination of gynecologic oncology in western healthcare settings : A rapid review. In: Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 409-418.
@article{a1c19a644e08473abcf2c2fd046120dc,
title = "Describing care coordination of gynecologic oncology in western healthcare settings: A rapid review",
abstract = "Caring for women with gynecologic malignancies requires multidisciplinary communication and coordination across multiple providers. This article discusses a rapid review of the literature on characteristics of care coordination for gynecologic malignancies. Five electronic databases (from inception through March 2015) were searched for empirical studies on coordinated care models for female adults with gynecologic malignancies. A single reviewer extracted and synthesized information on how care was coordinated, how care teams made decisions, who performed what tasks, how care teams communicated information to coordinate care, and potential impact of the characteristic on delivering coordinated care. From 26 included studies, predominant characteristics of coordinated care were identified: multidisciplinary teams, patient navigators, scheduled follow-ups, survivorship care plans, and colocated services. Decision-making was best documented for studies that utilized teams that had periodic scheduled meetings with set agendas and consistent procedures. Providers' roles in coordinating care were numerous, reflecting professional backgrounds: oncologists had most authority in making treatment decisions; radiologists and pathologists shared vital biomedical information; and nurses coordinated care and communicated with patients. Communication tools and strategies across studies included having shared medical records, integrated treatment plans, and telephone-based or teleconferencing communication. There was limited information available on the impact of characteristics and accompanying strategies or tools. Several characteristics of care coordination models for gynecologic cancers have been published in the literature. Further investigation is needed to understand the relative effectiveness of these ways to coordinate care.",
keywords = "Coordinated care, Gynecologic cancer, Rapid review, Women's health",
author = "Sean Grant and Aneesa Motala and Chrystal, {Joya G.} and Roberta Shanman and Jessica Zuchowski and Laurie Zephyrin and Cordasco, {Kristina M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1093/tbm/ibx074",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "409--418",
journal = "Translational Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "1869-6716",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Describing care coordination of gynecologic oncology in western healthcare settings

T2 - A rapid review

AU - Grant, Sean

AU - Motala, Aneesa

AU - Chrystal, Joya G.

AU - Shanman, Roberta

AU - Zuchowski, Jessica

AU - Zephyrin, Laurie

AU - Cordasco, Kristina M.

PY - 2018/5/23

Y1 - 2018/5/23

N2 - Caring for women with gynecologic malignancies requires multidisciplinary communication and coordination across multiple providers. This article discusses a rapid review of the literature on characteristics of care coordination for gynecologic malignancies. Five electronic databases (from inception through March 2015) were searched for empirical studies on coordinated care models for female adults with gynecologic malignancies. A single reviewer extracted and synthesized information on how care was coordinated, how care teams made decisions, who performed what tasks, how care teams communicated information to coordinate care, and potential impact of the characteristic on delivering coordinated care. From 26 included studies, predominant characteristics of coordinated care were identified: multidisciplinary teams, patient navigators, scheduled follow-ups, survivorship care plans, and colocated services. Decision-making was best documented for studies that utilized teams that had periodic scheduled meetings with set agendas and consistent procedures. Providers' roles in coordinating care were numerous, reflecting professional backgrounds: oncologists had most authority in making treatment decisions; radiologists and pathologists shared vital biomedical information; and nurses coordinated care and communicated with patients. Communication tools and strategies across studies included having shared medical records, integrated treatment plans, and telephone-based or teleconferencing communication. There was limited information available on the impact of characteristics and accompanying strategies or tools. Several characteristics of care coordination models for gynecologic cancers have been published in the literature. Further investigation is needed to understand the relative effectiveness of these ways to coordinate care.

AB - Caring for women with gynecologic malignancies requires multidisciplinary communication and coordination across multiple providers. This article discusses a rapid review of the literature on characteristics of care coordination for gynecologic malignancies. Five electronic databases (from inception through March 2015) were searched for empirical studies on coordinated care models for female adults with gynecologic malignancies. A single reviewer extracted and synthesized information on how care was coordinated, how care teams made decisions, who performed what tasks, how care teams communicated information to coordinate care, and potential impact of the characteristic on delivering coordinated care. From 26 included studies, predominant characteristics of coordinated care were identified: multidisciplinary teams, patient navigators, scheduled follow-ups, survivorship care plans, and colocated services. Decision-making was best documented for studies that utilized teams that had periodic scheduled meetings with set agendas and consistent procedures. Providers' roles in coordinating care were numerous, reflecting professional backgrounds: oncologists had most authority in making treatment decisions; radiologists and pathologists shared vital biomedical information; and nurses coordinated care and communicated with patients. Communication tools and strategies across studies included having shared medical records, integrated treatment plans, and telephone-based or teleconferencing communication. There was limited information available on the impact of characteristics and accompanying strategies or tools. Several characteristics of care coordination models for gynecologic cancers have been published in the literature. Further investigation is needed to understand the relative effectiveness of these ways to coordinate care.

KW - Coordinated care

KW - Gynecologic cancer

KW - Rapid review

KW - Women's health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047830918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047830918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/tbm/ibx074

DO - 10.1093/tbm/ibx074

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29800399

AN - SCOPUS:85047830918

VL - 8

SP - 409

EP - 418

JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine

JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1869-6716

IS - 3

ER -