Design and implementation of an ambulatory pH monitoring protocol in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux

Steve Harrell, Ben Evans, Steve Goudy, Welby Winstead, Eric Lentsch, Jennifer Koopman, John Wo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective/Hypothesis: Adding a hypopharyngeal sensor to esophageal pH monitoring has been advocated for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, selecting the proper pH catheter is problematic because esophageal lengths are variable among individuals. Objective: To design and implement a new pH monitoring protocol for LPR. Study Design/Methods: Design parameters were defined prospectively: single-probe, triple-sensor pH catheter with sensors located in the hypopharynx (1-3 cm above upper esophageal sphincter) and in proximal and distal esophagus (20 cm and 5 cm above lower esophageal sphincter, respectively). Esophageal lengths were determined in a study population undergoing esophageal manometry. Optimal pH sensor spacings were determined using the least number of catheters to satisfy the design parameters. The protocol was implemented in consecutive subjects with suspected LPR. Results: Distribution of esophageal lengths was determined in 1,043 subjects. In 92% of the study population, three pH catheters (3-15, 6-15, and 9-15 sensor-spacings) would satisfy the design criteria. Forty-one subjects with suspected LPR underwent the pH protocol. An abnormal pH test was found in 40 subjects (98%) with triple-sensor combination compared with 29 subjects (71%) if only dual esophageal sensors were used. Conclusions: Single-probe pH monitoring of the hypopharynx and esophagus was feasible. Adding a hypopharyngeal pH sensor increased the detection of abnormal acid reflux more often than traditional dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-92
Number of pages4
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume115
Issue number1 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Ambulatory Monitoring
Catheters
Esophageal pH Monitoring
Hypopharynx
Esophagus
Upper Esophageal Sphincter
Lower Esophageal Sphincter
Manometry
Population

Keywords

  • Extraesophageal manifestations of GERD
  • Laryngopharyngeal reflux
  • pH monitoring
  • Reflux laryngitis
  • Supraesophageal manifestations of GERD

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Design and implementation of an ambulatory pH monitoring protocol in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux. / Harrell, Steve; Evans, Ben; Goudy, Steve; Winstead, Welby; Lentsch, Eric; Koopman, Jennifer; Wo, John.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 115, No. 1 I, 01.2005, p. 89-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harrell, Steve ; Evans, Ben ; Goudy, Steve ; Winstead, Welby ; Lentsch, Eric ; Koopman, Jennifer ; Wo, John. / Design and implementation of an ambulatory pH monitoring protocol in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux. In: Laryngoscope. 2005 ; Vol. 115, No. 1 I. pp. 89-92.
@article{becf15bbae74495abf91cf0c5a218a81,
title = "Design and implementation of an ambulatory pH monitoring protocol in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux",
abstract = "Objective/Hypothesis: Adding a hypopharyngeal sensor to esophageal pH monitoring has been advocated for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, selecting the proper pH catheter is problematic because esophageal lengths are variable among individuals. Objective: To design and implement a new pH monitoring protocol for LPR. Study Design/Methods: Design parameters were defined prospectively: single-probe, triple-sensor pH catheter with sensors located in the hypopharynx (1-3 cm above upper esophageal sphincter) and in proximal and distal esophagus (20 cm and 5 cm above lower esophageal sphincter, respectively). Esophageal lengths were determined in a study population undergoing esophageal manometry. Optimal pH sensor spacings were determined using the least number of catheters to satisfy the design parameters. The protocol was implemented in consecutive subjects with suspected LPR. Results: Distribution of esophageal lengths was determined in 1,043 subjects. In 92{\%} of the study population, three pH catheters (3-15, 6-15, and 9-15 sensor-spacings) would satisfy the design criteria. Forty-one subjects with suspected LPR underwent the pH protocol. An abnormal pH test was found in 40 subjects (98{\%}) with triple-sensor combination compared with 29 subjects (71{\%}) if only dual esophageal sensors were used. Conclusions: Single-probe pH monitoring of the hypopharynx and esophagus was feasible. Adding a hypopharyngeal pH sensor increased the detection of abnormal acid reflux more often than traditional dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring.",
keywords = "Extraesophageal manifestations of GERD, Laryngopharyngeal reflux, pH monitoring, Reflux laryngitis, Supraesophageal manifestations of GERD",
author = "Steve Harrell and Ben Evans and Steve Goudy and Welby Winstead and Eric Lentsch and Jennifer Koopman and John Wo",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.mlg.0000150696.54000.a2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "89--92",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design and implementation of an ambulatory pH monitoring protocol in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux

AU - Harrell, Steve

AU - Evans, Ben

AU - Goudy, Steve

AU - Winstead, Welby

AU - Lentsch, Eric

AU - Koopman, Jennifer

AU - Wo, John

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Objective/Hypothesis: Adding a hypopharyngeal sensor to esophageal pH monitoring has been advocated for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, selecting the proper pH catheter is problematic because esophageal lengths are variable among individuals. Objective: To design and implement a new pH monitoring protocol for LPR. Study Design/Methods: Design parameters were defined prospectively: single-probe, triple-sensor pH catheter with sensors located in the hypopharynx (1-3 cm above upper esophageal sphincter) and in proximal and distal esophagus (20 cm and 5 cm above lower esophageal sphincter, respectively). Esophageal lengths were determined in a study population undergoing esophageal manometry. Optimal pH sensor spacings were determined using the least number of catheters to satisfy the design parameters. The protocol was implemented in consecutive subjects with suspected LPR. Results: Distribution of esophageal lengths was determined in 1,043 subjects. In 92% of the study population, three pH catheters (3-15, 6-15, and 9-15 sensor-spacings) would satisfy the design criteria. Forty-one subjects with suspected LPR underwent the pH protocol. An abnormal pH test was found in 40 subjects (98%) with triple-sensor combination compared with 29 subjects (71%) if only dual esophageal sensors were used. Conclusions: Single-probe pH monitoring of the hypopharynx and esophagus was feasible. Adding a hypopharyngeal pH sensor increased the detection of abnormal acid reflux more often than traditional dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring.

AB - Objective/Hypothesis: Adding a hypopharyngeal sensor to esophageal pH monitoring has been advocated for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, selecting the proper pH catheter is problematic because esophageal lengths are variable among individuals. Objective: To design and implement a new pH monitoring protocol for LPR. Study Design/Methods: Design parameters were defined prospectively: single-probe, triple-sensor pH catheter with sensors located in the hypopharynx (1-3 cm above upper esophageal sphincter) and in proximal and distal esophagus (20 cm and 5 cm above lower esophageal sphincter, respectively). Esophageal lengths were determined in a study population undergoing esophageal manometry. Optimal pH sensor spacings were determined using the least number of catheters to satisfy the design parameters. The protocol was implemented in consecutive subjects with suspected LPR. Results: Distribution of esophageal lengths was determined in 1,043 subjects. In 92% of the study population, three pH catheters (3-15, 6-15, and 9-15 sensor-spacings) would satisfy the design criteria. Forty-one subjects with suspected LPR underwent the pH protocol. An abnormal pH test was found in 40 subjects (98%) with triple-sensor combination compared with 29 subjects (71%) if only dual esophageal sensors were used. Conclusions: Single-probe pH monitoring of the hypopharynx and esophagus was feasible. Adding a hypopharyngeal pH sensor increased the detection of abnormal acid reflux more often than traditional dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring.

KW - Extraesophageal manifestations of GERD

KW - Laryngopharyngeal reflux

KW - pH monitoring

KW - Reflux laryngitis

KW - Supraesophageal manifestations of GERD

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11844272002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11844272002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mlg.0000150696.54000.a2

DO - 10.1097/01.mlg.0000150696.54000.a2

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 89

EP - 92

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 1 I

ER -