Designing a Patient-Centered User Interface for Access Decisions about EHR Data

Implications from Patient Interviews

Kelly Caine, Spencer Kohn, Carrie Lawrence, Rima Hanania, Eric M. Meslin, William M. Tierney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records change the landscape of patient data sharing and privacy by increasing the amount of information collected and stored and the number of potential recipients. Patients desire granular control over who receives what information in their electronic health record (EHR), but there are no current patient interfaces that allow them to record their preferences for EHR access.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to derive the user needs of patients regarding the design of a user interface that records patients’ individual choices about who can access data in their EHRs.

DESIGN: We used semi-structured interviews.

SETTING: The study was conducted in Central Indiana.

PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with data stored in an EHR, the majority of whom (70 %) had highly sensitive health EHR data, were included in the study.

APPROACH: We conducted a thematic and quantitative analysis of transcribed interview data.

KEY RESULTS: Patients rarely knew what data were in their EHRs, but would have liked to know. They also wanted to be able to control who could access what information in their EHR and wanted to be notified when their data we re accessed.

CONCLUSIONS: We derived six implications for the design of a patient-centered tool to allow individual choice in the disclosure of EHR: easy patient access to their EHRs; an overview of current EHR sharing permissions; granular, hierarchical control over EHR access; EHR access controls based on dates; contextual privacy controls; and notification when their EHRs are accessed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-16
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Interviews
Information Dissemination
Privacy
Confidentiality
Disclosure

Keywords

  • electronic health records
  • fair information practice
  • human factors
  • patient preferences
  • privacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Designing a Patient-Centered User Interface for Access Decisions about EHR Data : Implications from Patient Interviews. / Caine, Kelly; Kohn, Spencer; Lawrence, Carrie; Hanania, Rima; Meslin, Eric M.; Tierney, William M.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2015, p. 7-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caine, Kelly ; Kohn, Spencer ; Lawrence, Carrie ; Hanania, Rima ; Meslin, Eric M. ; Tierney, William M. / Designing a Patient-Centered User Interface for Access Decisions about EHR Data : Implications from Patient Interviews. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 7-16.
@article{9364ea0e9acd4cfba4e1b29115b65004,
title = "Designing a Patient-Centered User Interface for Access Decisions about EHR Data: Implications from Patient Interviews",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Electronic health records change the landscape of patient data sharing and privacy by increasing the amount of information collected and stored and the number of potential recipients. Patients desire granular control over who receives what information in their electronic health record (EHR), but there are no current patient interfaces that allow them to record their preferences for EHR access.OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to derive the user needs of patients regarding the design of a user interface that records patients’ individual choices about who can access data in their EHRs.DESIGN: We used semi-structured interviews.SETTING: The study was conducted in Central Indiana.PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with data stored in an EHR, the majority of whom (70 {\%}) had highly sensitive health EHR data, were included in the study.APPROACH: We conducted a thematic and quantitative analysis of transcribed interview data.KEY RESULTS: Patients rarely knew what data were in their EHRs, but would have liked to know. They also wanted to be able to control who could access what information in their EHR and wanted to be notified when their data we re accessed.CONCLUSIONS: We derived six implications for the design of a patient-centered tool to allow individual choice in the disclosure of EHR: easy patient access to their EHRs; an overview of current EHR sharing permissions; granular, hierarchical control over EHR access; EHR access controls based on dates; contextual privacy controls; and notification when their EHRs are accessed.",
keywords = "electronic health records, fair information practice, human factors, patient preferences, privacy",
author = "Kelly Caine and Spencer Kohn and Carrie Lawrence and Rima Hanania and Meslin, {Eric M.} and Tierney, {William M.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-014-3049-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "7--16",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Designing a Patient-Centered User Interface for Access Decisions about EHR Data

T2 - Implications from Patient Interviews

AU - Caine, Kelly

AU - Kohn, Spencer

AU - Lawrence, Carrie

AU - Hanania, Rima

AU - Meslin, Eric M.

AU - Tierney, William M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - BACKGROUND: Electronic health records change the landscape of patient data sharing and privacy by increasing the amount of information collected and stored and the number of potential recipients. Patients desire granular control over who receives what information in their electronic health record (EHR), but there are no current patient interfaces that allow them to record their preferences for EHR access.OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to derive the user needs of patients regarding the design of a user interface that records patients’ individual choices about who can access data in their EHRs.DESIGN: We used semi-structured interviews.SETTING: The study was conducted in Central Indiana.PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with data stored in an EHR, the majority of whom (70 %) had highly sensitive health EHR data, were included in the study.APPROACH: We conducted a thematic and quantitative analysis of transcribed interview data.KEY RESULTS: Patients rarely knew what data were in their EHRs, but would have liked to know. They also wanted to be able to control who could access what information in their EHR and wanted to be notified when their data we re accessed.CONCLUSIONS: We derived six implications for the design of a patient-centered tool to allow individual choice in the disclosure of EHR: easy patient access to their EHRs; an overview of current EHR sharing permissions; granular, hierarchical control over EHR access; EHR access controls based on dates; contextual privacy controls; and notification when their EHRs are accessed.

AB - BACKGROUND: Electronic health records change the landscape of patient data sharing and privacy by increasing the amount of information collected and stored and the number of potential recipients. Patients desire granular control over who receives what information in their electronic health record (EHR), but there are no current patient interfaces that allow them to record their preferences for EHR access.OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to derive the user needs of patients regarding the design of a user interface that records patients’ individual choices about who can access data in their EHRs.DESIGN: We used semi-structured interviews.SETTING: The study was conducted in Central Indiana.PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with data stored in an EHR, the majority of whom (70 %) had highly sensitive health EHR data, were included in the study.APPROACH: We conducted a thematic and quantitative analysis of transcribed interview data.KEY RESULTS: Patients rarely knew what data were in their EHRs, but would have liked to know. They also wanted to be able to control who could access what information in their EHR and wanted to be notified when their data we re accessed.CONCLUSIONS: We derived six implications for the design of a patient-centered tool to allow individual choice in the disclosure of EHR: easy patient access to their EHRs; an overview of current EHR sharing permissions; granular, hierarchical control over EHR access; EHR access controls based on dates; contextual privacy controls; and notification when their EHRs are accessed.

KW - electronic health records

KW - fair information practice

KW - human factors

KW - patient preferences

KW - privacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925484026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925484026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-014-3049-9

DO - 10.1007/s11606-014-3049-9

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 7

EP - 16

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 1

ER -