Detection of different kidney stone types

An ex vivo comparison of ultrashort echo time MRI to reference standard CT

El Sayed H Ibrahim, Joseph G. Cernigliaro, Robert A. Pooley, Mellena D. Bridges, Jamie G. Giesbrandt, James Williams, William E. Haley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose: With the development of ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences, it may now be possible to detect kidney stones by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this study, kidney stones of varying composition and sizes were imaged using both UTE MRI as well as the reference standard of computed tomography (CT), with different surrounding materials and scan setups. Methods: One hundred and fourteen kidney stones were inserted into agarose and urine phantoms and imaged both on a dual-energy CT (DECT) scanner using a standard renal stone imaging protocol and on an MRI scanner using the UTE sequence with both head and body surface coils. A subset of the stones representing all composition types and sizes was then inserted into the collecting system of porcine kidneys and imaged in vitro with both CT and MRI. Results: All of the stones were visible on both CT and MRI imaging. DECT was capable of differentiating between uric acid and nonuric acid stones. In MRI imaging, the choice of coil and large field of view (FOV) did not affect stone detection or image quality. The MRI images showed good visualization of the stones' shapes, and the stones' dimensions measured from MRI were in good agreement with the actual values (R 2=0.886, 0.895, and 0.81 in the agarose phantom, urine phantom, and pig kidneys, respectively). The measured T2 relaxation times ranged from 4.2 to 7.5ms, but did not show significant differences among different stone composition types. Conclusions: UTE MRI compared favorably with the reference standard CT for imaging stones of different composition types and sizes using body surface coil and large FOV, which suggests potential usefulness of UTE MRI in imaging kidney stones in vivo.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalClinical Imaging
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 20 2015

Fingerprint

Kidney Calculi
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Kidney
Sepharose
Swine
Urine
X-Ray Computed Tomography Scanners
Body Size
Uric Acid
Head
Acids

Keywords

  • Abdominal CT
  • Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)
  • Kidney stone imaging
  • MRI
  • Ultrashort echo time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Ibrahim, E. S. H., Cernigliaro, J. G., Pooley, R. A., Bridges, M. D., Giesbrandt, J. G., Williams, J., & Haley, W. E. (Accepted/In press). Detection of different kidney stone types: An ex vivo comparison of ultrashort echo time MRI to reference standard CT. Clinical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.09.005

Detection of different kidney stone types : An ex vivo comparison of ultrashort echo time MRI to reference standard CT. / Ibrahim, El Sayed H; Cernigliaro, Joseph G.; Pooley, Robert A.; Bridges, Mellena D.; Giesbrandt, Jamie G.; Williams, James; Haley, William E.

In: Clinical Imaging, 20.05.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ibrahim, El Sayed H ; Cernigliaro, Joseph G. ; Pooley, Robert A. ; Bridges, Mellena D. ; Giesbrandt, Jamie G. ; Williams, James ; Haley, William E. / Detection of different kidney stone types : An ex vivo comparison of ultrashort echo time MRI to reference standard CT. In: Clinical Imaging. 2015.
@article{80eb0c5e26a845a4bf802f93d83de0c9,
title = "Detection of different kidney stone types: An ex vivo comparison of ultrashort echo time MRI to reference standard CT",
abstract = "Background and purpose: With the development of ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences, it may now be possible to detect kidney stones by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this study, kidney stones of varying composition and sizes were imaged using both UTE MRI as well as the reference standard of computed tomography (CT), with different surrounding materials and scan setups. Methods: One hundred and fourteen kidney stones were inserted into agarose and urine phantoms and imaged both on a dual-energy CT (DECT) scanner using a standard renal stone imaging protocol and on an MRI scanner using the UTE sequence with both head and body surface coils. A subset of the stones representing all composition types and sizes was then inserted into the collecting system of porcine kidneys and imaged in vitro with both CT and MRI. Results: All of the stones were visible on both CT and MRI imaging. DECT was capable of differentiating between uric acid and nonuric acid stones. In MRI imaging, the choice of coil and large field of view (FOV) did not affect stone detection or image quality. The MRI images showed good visualization of the stones' shapes, and the stones' dimensions measured from MRI were in good agreement with the actual values (R 2=0.886, 0.895, and 0.81 in the agarose phantom, urine phantom, and pig kidneys, respectively). The measured T2 relaxation times ranged from 4.2 to 7.5ms, but did not show significant differences among different stone composition types. Conclusions: UTE MRI compared favorably with the reference standard CT for imaging stones of different composition types and sizes using body surface coil and large FOV, which suggests potential usefulness of UTE MRI in imaging kidney stones in vivo.",
keywords = "Abdominal CT, Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), Kidney stone imaging, MRI, Ultrashort echo time",
author = "Ibrahim, {El Sayed H} and Cernigliaro, {Joseph G.} and Pooley, {Robert A.} and Bridges, {Mellena D.} and Giesbrandt, {Jamie G.} and James Williams and Haley, {William E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.09.005",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Clinical Imaging",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of different kidney stone types

T2 - An ex vivo comparison of ultrashort echo time MRI to reference standard CT

AU - Ibrahim, El Sayed H

AU - Cernigliaro, Joseph G.

AU - Pooley, Robert A.

AU - Bridges, Mellena D.

AU - Giesbrandt, Jamie G.

AU - Williams, James

AU - Haley, William E.

PY - 2015/5/20

Y1 - 2015/5/20

N2 - Background and purpose: With the development of ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences, it may now be possible to detect kidney stones by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this study, kidney stones of varying composition and sizes were imaged using both UTE MRI as well as the reference standard of computed tomography (CT), with different surrounding materials and scan setups. Methods: One hundred and fourteen kidney stones were inserted into agarose and urine phantoms and imaged both on a dual-energy CT (DECT) scanner using a standard renal stone imaging protocol and on an MRI scanner using the UTE sequence with both head and body surface coils. A subset of the stones representing all composition types and sizes was then inserted into the collecting system of porcine kidneys and imaged in vitro with both CT and MRI. Results: All of the stones were visible on both CT and MRI imaging. DECT was capable of differentiating between uric acid and nonuric acid stones. In MRI imaging, the choice of coil and large field of view (FOV) did not affect stone detection or image quality. The MRI images showed good visualization of the stones' shapes, and the stones' dimensions measured from MRI were in good agreement with the actual values (R 2=0.886, 0.895, and 0.81 in the agarose phantom, urine phantom, and pig kidneys, respectively). The measured T2 relaxation times ranged from 4.2 to 7.5ms, but did not show significant differences among different stone composition types. Conclusions: UTE MRI compared favorably with the reference standard CT for imaging stones of different composition types and sizes using body surface coil and large FOV, which suggests potential usefulness of UTE MRI in imaging kidney stones in vivo.

AB - Background and purpose: With the development of ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences, it may now be possible to detect kidney stones by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this study, kidney stones of varying composition and sizes were imaged using both UTE MRI as well as the reference standard of computed tomography (CT), with different surrounding materials and scan setups. Methods: One hundred and fourteen kidney stones were inserted into agarose and urine phantoms and imaged both on a dual-energy CT (DECT) scanner using a standard renal stone imaging protocol and on an MRI scanner using the UTE sequence with both head and body surface coils. A subset of the stones representing all composition types and sizes was then inserted into the collecting system of porcine kidneys and imaged in vitro with both CT and MRI. Results: All of the stones were visible on both CT and MRI imaging. DECT was capable of differentiating between uric acid and nonuric acid stones. In MRI imaging, the choice of coil and large field of view (FOV) did not affect stone detection or image quality. The MRI images showed good visualization of the stones' shapes, and the stones' dimensions measured from MRI were in good agreement with the actual values (R 2=0.886, 0.895, and 0.81 in the agarose phantom, urine phantom, and pig kidneys, respectively). The measured T2 relaxation times ranged from 4.2 to 7.5ms, but did not show significant differences among different stone composition types. Conclusions: UTE MRI compared favorably with the reference standard CT for imaging stones of different composition types and sizes using body surface coil and large FOV, which suggests potential usefulness of UTE MRI in imaging kidney stones in vivo.

KW - Abdominal CT

KW - Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)

KW - Kidney stone imaging

KW - MRI

KW - Ultrashort echo time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951304720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951304720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.09.005

M3 - Article

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

ER -