Determining the drivers of academic success in surgery

An analysis of 3,850 faculty

Nakul P. Valsangkar, Teresa Zimmers, Bradford J. Kim, Casi Blanton, Mugdha M. Joshi, Teresa M. Bell, Attila Nakeeb, Gary Dunnington, Leonidas Koniaris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Determine drivers of academic productivity within U.S. departments of surgery. Methods: Eighty academic metrics for 3,850 faculty at the top 50 NIH-funded university- and 5 outstanding hospital-based surgical departments were collected using websites, Scopus, and NIH RePORTER. Results: Mean faculty size was 76. Overall, there were 35.3%assistant, 27.8% associate, and 36.9% full professors. Women comprised 21.8%; 4.9% were MD-PhDs and 6.1% PhDs. By faculty-rank, median publications/citations were: assistant, 14/175, associate, 39/649 and full-professor, 97/2250. General surgery divisions contributed the most publications and citations. Highest performing sub-specialties per faculty member were: research (58/1683), transplantation (51/1067), oncology (41/777), and cardiothoracic surgery (48/860). Overall, 23.5% of faculty were principal investigators for a current or former NIH grant, 9.5% for a current or former R01/U01/P01. The 10 most cited faculty (MCF) within each department contributed to 42% of all publications and 55% of all citations. MCF were most commonly general (25%), oncology (19%), or transplant surgeons (15%). Fifty-one-percent of MCF had current/former NIH funding, compared with 20% of the rest (p<0.05); funding rates for R01/U01/P01 grants was 25.1% vs. 6.8% (p<0.05). Rate of current-NIH MCF funding correlated with higher total departmental NIH rank (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Departmental academic productivity as defined by citations and NIH funding is highly driven by sections or divisions of research, general and transplantation surgery. MCF, regardless of subspecialty, contribute disproportionally to major grants and publications. Approaches that attract, develop, and retain funded MCF may be associated with dramatic increases in total departmental citations and NIH-funding.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0131678
JournalPLoS One
Volume10
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2015

Fingerprint

academic achievement
funding
Surgery
surgery
Oncology
Productivity
Publications
Organized Financing
principal investigators
Transplants
surgeons
Websites
Transplantation
Research
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Determining the drivers of academic success in surgery : An analysis of 3,850 faculty. / Valsangkar, Nakul P.; Zimmers, Teresa; Kim, Bradford J.; Blanton, Casi; Joshi, Mugdha M.; Bell, Teresa M.; Nakeeb, Attila; Dunnington, Gary; Koniaris, Leonidas.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 7, e0131678, 15.07.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valsangkar, Nakul P. ; Zimmers, Teresa ; Kim, Bradford J. ; Blanton, Casi ; Joshi, Mugdha M. ; Bell, Teresa M. ; Nakeeb, Attila ; Dunnington, Gary ; Koniaris, Leonidas. / Determining the drivers of academic success in surgery : An analysis of 3,850 faculty. In: PLoS One. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 7.
@article{1c90c8855a5d4deebad5b4398017ed40,
title = "Determining the drivers of academic success in surgery: An analysis of 3,850 faculty",
abstract = "Objective: Determine drivers of academic productivity within U.S. departments of surgery. Methods: Eighty academic metrics for 3,850 faculty at the top 50 NIH-funded university- and 5 outstanding hospital-based surgical departments were collected using websites, Scopus, and NIH RePORTER. Results: Mean faculty size was 76. Overall, there were 35.3{\%}assistant, 27.8{\%} associate, and 36.9{\%} full professors. Women comprised 21.8{\%}; 4.9{\%} were MD-PhDs and 6.1{\%} PhDs. By faculty-rank, median publications/citations were: assistant, 14/175, associate, 39/649 and full-professor, 97/2250. General surgery divisions contributed the most publications and citations. Highest performing sub-specialties per faculty member were: research (58/1683), transplantation (51/1067), oncology (41/777), and cardiothoracic surgery (48/860). Overall, 23.5{\%} of faculty were principal investigators for a current or former NIH grant, 9.5{\%} for a current or former R01/U01/P01. The 10 most cited faculty (MCF) within each department contributed to 42{\%} of all publications and 55{\%} of all citations. MCF were most commonly general (25{\%}), oncology (19{\%}), or transplant surgeons (15{\%}). Fifty-one-percent of MCF had current/former NIH funding, compared with 20{\%} of the rest (p<0.05); funding rates for R01/U01/P01 grants was 25.1{\%} vs. 6.8{\%} (p<0.05). Rate of current-NIH MCF funding correlated with higher total departmental NIH rank (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Departmental academic productivity as defined by citations and NIH funding is highly driven by sections or divisions of research, general and transplantation surgery. MCF, regardless of subspecialty, contribute disproportionally to major grants and publications. Approaches that attract, develop, and retain funded MCF may be associated with dramatic increases in total departmental citations and NIH-funding.",
author = "Valsangkar, {Nakul P.} and Teresa Zimmers and Kim, {Bradford J.} and Casi Blanton and Joshi, {Mugdha M.} and Bell, {Teresa M.} and Attila Nakeeb and Gary Dunnington and Leonidas Koniaris",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0131678",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determining the drivers of academic success in surgery

T2 - An analysis of 3,850 faculty

AU - Valsangkar, Nakul P.

AU - Zimmers, Teresa

AU - Kim, Bradford J.

AU - Blanton, Casi

AU - Joshi, Mugdha M.

AU - Bell, Teresa M.

AU - Nakeeb, Attila

AU - Dunnington, Gary

AU - Koniaris, Leonidas

PY - 2015/7/15

Y1 - 2015/7/15

N2 - Objective: Determine drivers of academic productivity within U.S. departments of surgery. Methods: Eighty academic metrics for 3,850 faculty at the top 50 NIH-funded university- and 5 outstanding hospital-based surgical departments were collected using websites, Scopus, and NIH RePORTER. Results: Mean faculty size was 76. Overall, there were 35.3%assistant, 27.8% associate, and 36.9% full professors. Women comprised 21.8%; 4.9% were MD-PhDs and 6.1% PhDs. By faculty-rank, median publications/citations were: assistant, 14/175, associate, 39/649 and full-professor, 97/2250. General surgery divisions contributed the most publications and citations. Highest performing sub-specialties per faculty member were: research (58/1683), transplantation (51/1067), oncology (41/777), and cardiothoracic surgery (48/860). Overall, 23.5% of faculty were principal investigators for a current or former NIH grant, 9.5% for a current or former R01/U01/P01. The 10 most cited faculty (MCF) within each department contributed to 42% of all publications and 55% of all citations. MCF were most commonly general (25%), oncology (19%), or transplant surgeons (15%). Fifty-one-percent of MCF had current/former NIH funding, compared with 20% of the rest (p<0.05); funding rates for R01/U01/P01 grants was 25.1% vs. 6.8% (p<0.05). Rate of current-NIH MCF funding correlated with higher total departmental NIH rank (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Departmental academic productivity as defined by citations and NIH funding is highly driven by sections or divisions of research, general and transplantation surgery. MCF, regardless of subspecialty, contribute disproportionally to major grants and publications. Approaches that attract, develop, and retain funded MCF may be associated with dramatic increases in total departmental citations and NIH-funding.

AB - Objective: Determine drivers of academic productivity within U.S. departments of surgery. Methods: Eighty academic metrics for 3,850 faculty at the top 50 NIH-funded university- and 5 outstanding hospital-based surgical departments were collected using websites, Scopus, and NIH RePORTER. Results: Mean faculty size was 76. Overall, there were 35.3%assistant, 27.8% associate, and 36.9% full professors. Women comprised 21.8%; 4.9% were MD-PhDs and 6.1% PhDs. By faculty-rank, median publications/citations were: assistant, 14/175, associate, 39/649 and full-professor, 97/2250. General surgery divisions contributed the most publications and citations. Highest performing sub-specialties per faculty member were: research (58/1683), transplantation (51/1067), oncology (41/777), and cardiothoracic surgery (48/860). Overall, 23.5% of faculty were principal investigators for a current or former NIH grant, 9.5% for a current or former R01/U01/P01. The 10 most cited faculty (MCF) within each department contributed to 42% of all publications and 55% of all citations. MCF were most commonly general (25%), oncology (19%), or transplant surgeons (15%). Fifty-one-percent of MCF had current/former NIH funding, compared with 20% of the rest (p<0.05); funding rates for R01/U01/P01 grants was 25.1% vs. 6.8% (p<0.05). Rate of current-NIH MCF funding correlated with higher total departmental NIH rank (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Departmental academic productivity as defined by citations and NIH funding is highly driven by sections or divisions of research, general and transplantation surgery. MCF, regardless of subspecialty, contribute disproportionally to major grants and publications. Approaches that attract, develop, and retain funded MCF may be associated with dramatic increases in total departmental citations and NIH-funding.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941347162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941347162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0131678

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0131678

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0131678

ER -