Developing a taxonomy for the science of improvement in public health

William Riley, Beth Lownik, Paul Halverson, Carmen Parrotta, Jonathan R. Godsall, Elizabeth Gyllstrom, Kimberly J. Gearin, Glen Mays

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Quality improvement (QI) methods have been used for almost a decade in public health departments to increase effectiveness and efficiency. Although results are rapidly accumulating, the evidence for the science of improvement is shallow and limited. To advance the use and effectiveness of QI in public health, it is important to develop a science of improvement using practice-based research to build an evidence base for QI projects. Objectives: This purpose of this study is to advance the science of improvement in public health departments with 3 objectives: (1) establish a taxonomy of QI projects in public health, (2) categorize QI projects undertaken in health departments using the taxonomy, and (3) create an opportunity modes and effects analysis. Design: This study is a qualitative analysis of archival data from 2 separate large databases consisting of 51 QI projects undertaken in public health departments over the last 5 years. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:: The study involves 2 separate QI collaboratives. One includes Minnesota health departments; the other is a national collaborative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: We propose a standardized case definition, common metrics, and a taxonomy of QI projects to begin building the evidence base for QI in public health and to advance the science of continuous quality improvement. Results : All projects created an aim statement and used metrics while 53% used a specific QI model with an average of 3.25 QI techniques per project. Approximately 40% of the projects incorporated a process control methodology, and 60% of the projects identified the process from beginning to end, while 11 of 12 PHAB (Public Health Accreditation Board) domains were included. Conclusions : The findings provide a baseline for QI taxonomy to operationalize a science of improvement for public health departments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)506-514
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Public Health
Accreditation
Health
Databases

Keywords

  • opportunity modes and effects analysis
  • quality improvement in public health departments
  • quality improvement taxonomy
  • science of improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Developing a taxonomy for the science of improvement in public health. / Riley, William; Lownik, Beth; Halverson, Paul; Parrotta, Carmen; Godsall, Jonathan R.; Gyllstrom, Elizabeth; Gearin, Kimberly J.; Mays, Glen.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 18, No. 6, 01.11.2012, p. 506-514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riley, W, Lownik, B, Halverson, P, Parrotta, C, Godsall, JR, Gyllstrom, E, Gearin, KJ & Mays, G 2012, 'Developing a taxonomy for the science of improvement in public health', Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825fbb12
Riley, William ; Lownik, Beth ; Halverson, Paul ; Parrotta, Carmen ; Godsall, Jonathan R. ; Gyllstrom, Elizabeth ; Gearin, Kimberly J. ; Mays, Glen. / Developing a taxonomy for the science of improvement in public health. In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 6. pp. 506-514.
@article{c79082f4980f4d1e95ad61464b55cbb5,
title = "Developing a taxonomy for the science of improvement in public health",
abstract = "Context: Quality improvement (QI) methods have been used for almost a decade in public health departments to increase effectiveness and efficiency. Although results are rapidly accumulating, the evidence for the science of improvement is shallow and limited. To advance the use and effectiveness of QI in public health, it is important to develop a science of improvement using practice-based research to build an evidence base for QI projects. Objectives: This purpose of this study is to advance the science of improvement in public health departments with 3 objectives: (1) establish a taxonomy of QI projects in public health, (2) categorize QI projects undertaken in health departments using the taxonomy, and (3) create an opportunity modes and effects analysis. Design: This study is a qualitative analysis of archival data from 2 separate large databases consisting of 51 QI projects undertaken in public health departments over the last 5 years. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:: The study involves 2 separate QI collaboratives. One includes Minnesota health departments; the other is a national collaborative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: We propose a standardized case definition, common metrics, and a taxonomy of QI projects to begin building the evidence base for QI in public health and to advance the science of continuous quality improvement. Results : All projects created an aim statement and used metrics while 53{\%} used a specific QI model with an average of 3.25 QI techniques per project. Approximately 40{\%} of the projects incorporated a process control methodology, and 60{\%} of the projects identified the process from beginning to end, while 11 of 12 PHAB (Public Health Accreditation Board) domains were included. Conclusions : The findings provide a baseline for QI taxonomy to operationalize a science of improvement for public health departments.",
keywords = "opportunity modes and effects analysis, quality improvement in public health departments, quality improvement taxonomy, science of improvement",
author = "William Riley and Beth Lownik and Paul Halverson and Carmen Parrotta and Godsall, {Jonathan R.} and Elizabeth Gyllstrom and Gearin, {Kimberly J.} and Glen Mays",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825fbb12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "506--514",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing a taxonomy for the science of improvement in public health

AU - Riley, William

AU - Lownik, Beth

AU - Halverson, Paul

AU - Parrotta, Carmen

AU - Godsall, Jonathan R.

AU - Gyllstrom, Elizabeth

AU - Gearin, Kimberly J.

AU - Mays, Glen

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - Context: Quality improvement (QI) methods have been used for almost a decade in public health departments to increase effectiveness and efficiency. Although results are rapidly accumulating, the evidence for the science of improvement is shallow and limited. To advance the use and effectiveness of QI in public health, it is important to develop a science of improvement using practice-based research to build an evidence base for QI projects. Objectives: This purpose of this study is to advance the science of improvement in public health departments with 3 objectives: (1) establish a taxonomy of QI projects in public health, (2) categorize QI projects undertaken in health departments using the taxonomy, and (3) create an opportunity modes and effects analysis. Design: This study is a qualitative analysis of archival data from 2 separate large databases consisting of 51 QI projects undertaken in public health departments over the last 5 years. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:: The study involves 2 separate QI collaboratives. One includes Minnesota health departments; the other is a national collaborative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: We propose a standardized case definition, common metrics, and a taxonomy of QI projects to begin building the evidence base for QI in public health and to advance the science of continuous quality improvement. Results : All projects created an aim statement and used metrics while 53% used a specific QI model with an average of 3.25 QI techniques per project. Approximately 40% of the projects incorporated a process control methodology, and 60% of the projects identified the process from beginning to end, while 11 of 12 PHAB (Public Health Accreditation Board) domains were included. Conclusions : The findings provide a baseline for QI taxonomy to operationalize a science of improvement for public health departments.

AB - Context: Quality improvement (QI) methods have been used for almost a decade in public health departments to increase effectiveness and efficiency. Although results are rapidly accumulating, the evidence for the science of improvement is shallow and limited. To advance the use and effectiveness of QI in public health, it is important to develop a science of improvement using practice-based research to build an evidence base for QI projects. Objectives: This purpose of this study is to advance the science of improvement in public health departments with 3 objectives: (1) establish a taxonomy of QI projects in public health, (2) categorize QI projects undertaken in health departments using the taxonomy, and (3) create an opportunity modes and effects analysis. Design: This study is a qualitative analysis of archival data from 2 separate large databases consisting of 51 QI projects undertaken in public health departments over the last 5 years. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:: The study involves 2 separate QI collaboratives. One includes Minnesota health departments; the other is a national collaborative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: We propose a standardized case definition, common metrics, and a taxonomy of QI projects to begin building the evidence base for QI in public health and to advance the science of continuous quality improvement. Results : All projects created an aim statement and used metrics while 53% used a specific QI model with an average of 3.25 QI techniques per project. Approximately 40% of the projects incorporated a process control methodology, and 60% of the projects identified the process from beginning to end, while 11 of 12 PHAB (Public Health Accreditation Board) domains were included. Conclusions : The findings provide a baseline for QI taxonomy to operationalize a science of improvement for public health departments.

KW - opportunity modes and effects analysis

KW - quality improvement in public health departments

KW - quality improvement taxonomy

KW - science of improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867538129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867538129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825fbb12

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825fbb12

M3 - Article

C2 - 23023274

AN - SCOPUS:84867538129

VL - 18

SP - 506

EP - 514

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 6

ER -