Development and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference

Erin E. Krebs, Karl A. Lorenz, Matthew Bair, Teresa Damush, Jingwei Wu, Jason M. Sutherland, Steven M. Asch, Kurt Kroenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

177 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inadequate pain assessment is a barrier to appropriate pain management, but single-item "pain screening" provides limited information about chronic pain. Multidimensional pain measures such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) are widely used in pain specialty and research settings, but are impractical for primary care. A brief and straightforward multidimensional pain measure could potentially improve initial assessment and follow-up of chronic pain in primary care. OBJECTIVES: To develop an ultra-brief pain measure derived from the BPI. DESIGN: Development of a shortened three-item pain measure and initial assessment of its reliability, validity, and responsiveness. PARTICIPANTS: We used data from 1) a longitudinal study of 500 primary care patients with chronic pain and 2) a cross-sectional study of 646 veterans recruited from ambulatory care. RESULTS: Selected items assess average pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G). Reliability of the three-item scale (PEG) was α∈=∈0.73 and 0.89 in the two study samples. Overall, construct validity of the PEG was good for various pain-specific measures (r∈=∈0.60-0.89 in Study 1 and r∈=∈0.77-0.95 in Study 2), and comparable to that of the BPI. The PEG was sensitive to change and differentiated between patients with and without pain improvement at 6 months. DISCUSSION: We provide strong initial evidence for reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the PEG among primary care and other ambulatory clinic patients. The PEG may be a practical and useful tool to improve assessment and monitoring of chronic pain in primary care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)733-738
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Pain
Primary Health Care
Chronic Pain
Reproducibility of Results
Equipment and Supplies
Veterans
Pain Measurement
Pain Management
Ambulatory Care
Longitudinal Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Research

Keywords

  • Measurement
  • Pain
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Development and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference. / Krebs, Erin E.; Lorenz, Karl A.; Bair, Matthew; Damush, Teresa; Wu, Jingwei; Sutherland, Jason M.; Asch, Steven M.; Kroenke, Kurt.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 733-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krebs, Erin E. ; Lorenz, Karl A. ; Bair, Matthew ; Damush, Teresa ; Wu, Jingwei ; Sutherland, Jason M. ; Asch, Steven M. ; Kroenke, Kurt. / Development and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 733-738.
@article{f54585828c1e47a184f350900dd50ea0,
title = "Development and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Inadequate pain assessment is a barrier to appropriate pain management, but single-item {"}pain screening{"} provides limited information about chronic pain. Multidimensional pain measures such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) are widely used in pain specialty and research settings, but are impractical for primary care. A brief and straightforward multidimensional pain measure could potentially improve initial assessment and follow-up of chronic pain in primary care. OBJECTIVES: To develop an ultra-brief pain measure derived from the BPI. DESIGN: Development of a shortened three-item pain measure and initial assessment of its reliability, validity, and responsiveness. PARTICIPANTS: We used data from 1) a longitudinal study of 500 primary care patients with chronic pain and 2) a cross-sectional study of 646 veterans recruited from ambulatory care. RESULTS: Selected items assess average pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G). Reliability of the three-item scale (PEG) was α∈=∈0.73 and 0.89 in the two study samples. Overall, construct validity of the PEG was good for various pain-specific measures (r∈=∈0.60-0.89 in Study 1 and r∈=∈0.77-0.95 in Study 2), and comparable to that of the BPI. The PEG was sensitive to change and differentiated between patients with and without pain improvement at 6 months. DISCUSSION: We provide strong initial evidence for reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the PEG among primary care and other ambulatory clinic patients. The PEG may be a practical and useful tool to improve assessment and monitoring of chronic pain in primary care.",
keywords = "Measurement, Pain, Primary care",
author = "Krebs, {Erin E.} and Lorenz, {Karl A.} and Matthew Bair and Teresa Damush and Jingwei Wu and Sutherland, {Jason M.} and Asch, {Steven M.} and Kurt Kroenke",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-009-0981-1",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "733--738",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference

AU - Krebs, Erin E.

AU - Lorenz, Karl A.

AU - Bair, Matthew

AU - Damush, Teresa

AU - Wu, Jingwei

AU - Sutherland, Jason M.

AU - Asch, Steven M.

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: Inadequate pain assessment is a barrier to appropriate pain management, but single-item "pain screening" provides limited information about chronic pain. Multidimensional pain measures such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) are widely used in pain specialty and research settings, but are impractical for primary care. A brief and straightforward multidimensional pain measure could potentially improve initial assessment and follow-up of chronic pain in primary care. OBJECTIVES: To develop an ultra-brief pain measure derived from the BPI. DESIGN: Development of a shortened three-item pain measure and initial assessment of its reliability, validity, and responsiveness. PARTICIPANTS: We used data from 1) a longitudinal study of 500 primary care patients with chronic pain and 2) a cross-sectional study of 646 veterans recruited from ambulatory care. RESULTS: Selected items assess average pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G). Reliability of the three-item scale (PEG) was α∈=∈0.73 and 0.89 in the two study samples. Overall, construct validity of the PEG was good for various pain-specific measures (r∈=∈0.60-0.89 in Study 1 and r∈=∈0.77-0.95 in Study 2), and comparable to that of the BPI. The PEG was sensitive to change and differentiated between patients with and without pain improvement at 6 months. DISCUSSION: We provide strong initial evidence for reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the PEG among primary care and other ambulatory clinic patients. The PEG may be a practical and useful tool to improve assessment and monitoring of chronic pain in primary care.

AB - BACKGROUND: Inadequate pain assessment is a barrier to appropriate pain management, but single-item "pain screening" provides limited information about chronic pain. Multidimensional pain measures such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) are widely used in pain specialty and research settings, but are impractical for primary care. A brief and straightforward multidimensional pain measure could potentially improve initial assessment and follow-up of chronic pain in primary care. OBJECTIVES: To develop an ultra-brief pain measure derived from the BPI. DESIGN: Development of a shortened three-item pain measure and initial assessment of its reliability, validity, and responsiveness. PARTICIPANTS: We used data from 1) a longitudinal study of 500 primary care patients with chronic pain and 2) a cross-sectional study of 646 veterans recruited from ambulatory care. RESULTS: Selected items assess average pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G). Reliability of the three-item scale (PEG) was α∈=∈0.73 and 0.89 in the two study samples. Overall, construct validity of the PEG was good for various pain-specific measures (r∈=∈0.60-0.89 in Study 1 and r∈=∈0.77-0.95 in Study 2), and comparable to that of the BPI. The PEG was sensitive to change and differentiated between patients with and without pain improvement at 6 months. DISCUSSION: We provide strong initial evidence for reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the PEG among primary care and other ambulatory clinic patients. The PEG may be a practical and useful tool to improve assessment and monitoring of chronic pain in primary care.

KW - Measurement

KW - Pain

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349272255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349272255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-009-0981-1

DO - 10.1007/s11606-009-0981-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 19418100

AN - SCOPUS:67349272255

VL - 24

SP - 733

EP - 738

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 6

ER -