Development and psychometric testing of a breast cancer survivor self-efficacy scale

Victoria Champion, Kim W. Ziner, Patrick Monahan, Timothy E. Stump, David Cella, Lisa G. Smith, Cynthia J. Bell, Diane Von Ah, George W. Sledge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives: To describe the development of a self-efficacy instrument that measures perceived ability to manage symptoms and quality-of-life problems resulting from the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Design: Items were developed and content validity assessed. A 14-item scale was psychometrically evaluated using internal consistency reliability and several types of construct validity. Sample: 1,127 female breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Methods: Written consents were mailed to the research office. Data were collected via mail and telephone. Main Research Variables: Demographics, symptom bother, communication with healthcare provider, attention function, fear of recurrence, depression, marital satisfaction, fatigue, sexual functioning, trait and state anxiety, and overall well-being. Findings: Data demonstrated that the breast cancer self-efficacy scale (BCSES) was reliable, with an alpha coefficient of 0.89, inter-item correlations ranging from 0.3-0.6, and itemtotal correlation coefficients ranging from 0.5-0.73. Three of 14 items were deleted because of redundancy as identified through high (> 0.7) inter-item correlations. Factor analysis revealed that the scale was unidimensional. Predictive validity was supported through testing associations between self-efficacy and theoretically supported quality-of-life variables, including physical, psychological, and social dimensions, as well as overall well-being. Conclusions: The BCSES demonstrated high internal consistency reliability, unidimensionality, and excellent content and construct validity. This scale should be integrated into interventions that target self-efficacy for managing symptoms in BCSs. Implications for Nursing: Nurses working with BCSs may use this tool to assess areas in which survivors might need to build confidence to adequately cope with their specific survivorship concerns. Knowledge Translation: The use of the BCSES can inform nurse researchers about the impact of an intervention on self-efficacy in the context of breast cancer survivorship, improving the ability to deliver effective interventions. The scale is brief and easy to administer. Results of this study demonstrate clear psychometric reliability and validity, suggesting that the BCSES should be put to use immediately in interventions targeting the quality of life of BCSs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOncology Nursing Forum
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Self Efficacy
Psychometrics
Survivors
Breast Neoplasms
Aptitude
Quality of Life
Survival Rate
Nurses
Orgasm
Translational Medical Research
Postal Service
Research
Telephone
Reproducibility of Results
Health Personnel
Statistical Factor Analysis
Fear
Fatigue
Nursing
Anxiety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Development and psychometric testing of a breast cancer survivor self-efficacy scale. / Champion, Victoria; Ziner, Kim W.; Monahan, Patrick; Stump, Timothy E.; Cella, David; Smith, Lisa G.; Bell, Cynthia J.; Von Ah, Diane; Sledge, George W.

In: Oncology Nursing Forum, Vol. 40, No. 6, 11.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Champion, Victoria ; Ziner, Kim W. ; Monahan, Patrick ; Stump, Timothy E. ; Cella, David ; Smith, Lisa G. ; Bell, Cynthia J. ; Von Ah, Diane ; Sledge, George W. / Development and psychometric testing of a breast cancer survivor self-efficacy scale. In: Oncology Nursing Forum. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 6.
@article{acc978dcdb4a46ec95532f7e63787f07,
title = "Development and psychometric testing of a breast cancer survivor self-efficacy scale",
abstract = "Purpose/Objectives: To describe the development of a self-efficacy instrument that measures perceived ability to manage symptoms and quality-of-life problems resulting from the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Design: Items were developed and content validity assessed. A 14-item scale was psychometrically evaluated using internal consistency reliability and several types of construct validity. Sample: 1,127 female breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Methods: Written consents were mailed to the research office. Data were collected via mail and telephone. Main Research Variables: Demographics, symptom bother, communication with healthcare provider, attention function, fear of recurrence, depression, marital satisfaction, fatigue, sexual functioning, trait and state anxiety, and overall well-being. Findings: Data demonstrated that the breast cancer self-efficacy scale (BCSES) was reliable, with an alpha coefficient of 0.89, inter-item correlations ranging from 0.3-0.6, and itemtotal correlation coefficients ranging from 0.5-0.73. Three of 14 items were deleted because of redundancy as identified through high (> 0.7) inter-item correlations. Factor analysis revealed that the scale was unidimensional. Predictive validity was supported through testing associations between self-efficacy and theoretically supported quality-of-life variables, including physical, psychological, and social dimensions, as well as overall well-being. Conclusions: The BCSES demonstrated high internal consistency reliability, unidimensionality, and excellent content and construct validity. This scale should be integrated into interventions that target self-efficacy for managing symptoms in BCSs. Implications for Nursing: Nurses working with BCSs may use this tool to assess areas in which survivors might need to build confidence to adequately cope with their specific survivorship concerns. Knowledge Translation: The use of the BCSES can inform nurse researchers about the impact of an intervention on self-efficacy in the context of breast cancer survivorship, improving the ability to deliver effective interventions. The scale is brief and easy to administer. Results of this study demonstrate clear psychometric reliability and validity, suggesting that the BCSES should be put to use immediately in interventions targeting the quality of life of BCSs.",
author = "Victoria Champion and Ziner, {Kim W.} and Patrick Monahan and Stump, {Timothy E.} and David Cella and Smith, {Lisa G.} and Bell, {Cynthia J.} and {Von Ah}, Diane and Sledge, {George W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1188/13.ONF.E403-E410",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "1538-0688",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and psychometric testing of a breast cancer survivor self-efficacy scale

AU - Champion, Victoria

AU - Ziner, Kim W.

AU - Monahan, Patrick

AU - Stump, Timothy E.

AU - Cella, David

AU - Smith, Lisa G.

AU - Bell, Cynthia J.

AU - Von Ah, Diane

AU - Sledge, George W.

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Purpose/Objectives: To describe the development of a self-efficacy instrument that measures perceived ability to manage symptoms and quality-of-life problems resulting from the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Design: Items were developed and content validity assessed. A 14-item scale was psychometrically evaluated using internal consistency reliability and several types of construct validity. Sample: 1,127 female breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Methods: Written consents were mailed to the research office. Data were collected via mail and telephone. Main Research Variables: Demographics, symptom bother, communication with healthcare provider, attention function, fear of recurrence, depression, marital satisfaction, fatigue, sexual functioning, trait and state anxiety, and overall well-being. Findings: Data demonstrated that the breast cancer self-efficacy scale (BCSES) was reliable, with an alpha coefficient of 0.89, inter-item correlations ranging from 0.3-0.6, and itemtotal correlation coefficients ranging from 0.5-0.73. Three of 14 items were deleted because of redundancy as identified through high (> 0.7) inter-item correlations. Factor analysis revealed that the scale was unidimensional. Predictive validity was supported through testing associations between self-efficacy and theoretically supported quality-of-life variables, including physical, psychological, and social dimensions, as well as overall well-being. Conclusions: The BCSES demonstrated high internal consistency reliability, unidimensionality, and excellent content and construct validity. This scale should be integrated into interventions that target self-efficacy for managing symptoms in BCSs. Implications for Nursing: Nurses working with BCSs may use this tool to assess areas in which survivors might need to build confidence to adequately cope with their specific survivorship concerns. Knowledge Translation: The use of the BCSES can inform nurse researchers about the impact of an intervention on self-efficacy in the context of breast cancer survivorship, improving the ability to deliver effective interventions. The scale is brief and easy to administer. Results of this study demonstrate clear psychometric reliability and validity, suggesting that the BCSES should be put to use immediately in interventions targeting the quality of life of BCSs.

AB - Purpose/Objectives: To describe the development of a self-efficacy instrument that measures perceived ability to manage symptoms and quality-of-life problems resulting from the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Design: Items were developed and content validity assessed. A 14-item scale was psychometrically evaluated using internal consistency reliability and several types of construct validity. Sample: 1,127 female breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Methods: Written consents were mailed to the research office. Data were collected via mail and telephone. Main Research Variables: Demographics, symptom bother, communication with healthcare provider, attention function, fear of recurrence, depression, marital satisfaction, fatigue, sexual functioning, trait and state anxiety, and overall well-being. Findings: Data demonstrated that the breast cancer self-efficacy scale (BCSES) was reliable, with an alpha coefficient of 0.89, inter-item correlations ranging from 0.3-0.6, and itemtotal correlation coefficients ranging from 0.5-0.73. Three of 14 items were deleted because of redundancy as identified through high (> 0.7) inter-item correlations. Factor analysis revealed that the scale was unidimensional. Predictive validity was supported through testing associations between self-efficacy and theoretically supported quality-of-life variables, including physical, psychological, and social dimensions, as well as overall well-being. Conclusions: The BCSES demonstrated high internal consistency reliability, unidimensionality, and excellent content and construct validity. This scale should be integrated into interventions that target self-efficacy for managing symptoms in BCSs. Implications for Nursing: Nurses working with BCSs may use this tool to assess areas in which survivors might need to build confidence to adequately cope with their specific survivorship concerns. Knowledge Translation: The use of the BCSES can inform nurse researchers about the impact of an intervention on self-efficacy in the context of breast cancer survivorship, improving the ability to deliver effective interventions. The scale is brief and easy to administer. Results of this study demonstrate clear psychometric reliability and validity, suggesting that the BCSES should be put to use immediately in interventions targeting the quality of life of BCSs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893154716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893154716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/13.ONF.E403-E410

DO - 10.1188/13.ONF.E403-E410

M3 - Article

C2 - 24161644

AN - SCOPUS:84893154716

VL - 40

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 1538-0688

IS - 6

ER -