Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention

protocol for a mixed methods study

Dennis P. Watson, Jeani Young, ​Emily  ​Ahonen, Huiping Xu, Macey Henderson, Valery Shuman, Randi Tolliver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of scientifically designed and tested implementation strategies. Such strategies are particularly important for highly complex interventions that require coordination between multiple parts to be successful. This paper presents a protocol for the development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex intervention known as the Housing First model (HFM). Housing First is an evidence-based practice for chronically homeless individuals demonstrated to significantly improve a number of outcomes.

METHODS/DESIGN: Drawing on practices demonstrated to be useful in implementation and e-learning theory, our team is currently adapting a face-to-face implementation strategy so that it can be delivered over a distance. Research activities will be divided between Chicago and Central Indiana, two areas with significantly different barriers to HFM implementation. Ten housing providers (five from Chicago and five from Indiana) will be recruited to conduct an alpha test of each of four e-learning modules as they are developed. Providers will be requested to keep a detailed log of their experience completing the modules and participate in one of two focus groups. After refining the modules based on alpha test results, we will test the strategy among a sample of four housing organizations (two from Chicago and two from Indiana). We will collect and analyze both qualitative and quantitative data from administration and staff. Measures of interest include causal factors affecting implementation, training outcomes, and implementation outcomes.

DISCUSSION: This project is an important first step in the development of an evidence-based implementation strategy to increase scalability and impact of the HFM. The project also has strong potential to increase limited scientific knowledge regarding implementation strategies in general.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138
Number of pages1
JournalImplementation Science
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Learning
Evidence-Based Practice
Focus Groups
Organizations
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention : protocol for a mixed methods study. / Watson, Dennis P.; Young, Jeani; ​Ahonen, ​Emily ; Xu, Huiping; Henderson, Macey; Shuman, Valery; Tolliver, Randi.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 9, 2014, p. 138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d7c96aab1384a0fb0442160928f22f7,
title = "Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention: protocol for a mixed methods study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of scientifically designed and tested implementation strategies. Such strategies are particularly important for highly complex interventions that require coordination between multiple parts to be successful. This paper presents a protocol for the development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex intervention known as the Housing First model (HFM). Housing First is an evidence-based practice for chronically homeless individuals demonstrated to significantly improve a number of outcomes.METHODS/DESIGN: Drawing on practices demonstrated to be useful in implementation and e-learning theory, our team is currently adapting a face-to-face implementation strategy so that it can be delivered over a distance. Research activities will be divided between Chicago and Central Indiana, two areas with significantly different barriers to HFM implementation. Ten housing providers (five from Chicago and five from Indiana) will be recruited to conduct an alpha test of each of four e-learning modules as they are developed. Providers will be requested to keep a detailed log of their experience completing the modules and participate in one of two focus groups. After refining the modules based on alpha test results, we will test the strategy among a sample of four housing organizations (two from Chicago and two from Indiana). We will collect and analyze both qualitative and quantitative data from administration and staff. Measures of interest include causal factors affecting implementation, training outcomes, and implementation outcomes.DISCUSSION: This project is an important first step in the development of an evidence-based implementation strategy to increase scalability and impact of the HFM. The project also has strong potential to increase limited scientific knowledge regarding implementation strategies in general.",
author = "Watson, {Dennis P.} and Jeani Young and ​Emily  ​Ahonen and Huiping Xu and Macey Henderson and Valery Shuman and Randi Tolliver",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1186/s13012-014-0138-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "138",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention

T2 - protocol for a mixed methods study

AU - Watson, Dennis P.

AU - Young, Jeani

AU - ​Ahonen, ​Emily 

AU - Xu, Huiping

AU - Henderson, Macey

AU - Shuman, Valery

AU - Tolliver, Randi

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of scientifically designed and tested implementation strategies. Such strategies are particularly important for highly complex interventions that require coordination between multiple parts to be successful. This paper presents a protocol for the development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex intervention known as the Housing First model (HFM). Housing First is an evidence-based practice for chronically homeless individuals demonstrated to significantly improve a number of outcomes.METHODS/DESIGN: Drawing on practices demonstrated to be useful in implementation and e-learning theory, our team is currently adapting a face-to-face implementation strategy so that it can be delivered over a distance. Research activities will be divided between Chicago and Central Indiana, two areas with significantly different barriers to HFM implementation. Ten housing providers (five from Chicago and five from Indiana) will be recruited to conduct an alpha test of each of four e-learning modules as they are developed. Providers will be requested to keep a detailed log of their experience completing the modules and participate in one of two focus groups. After refining the modules based on alpha test results, we will test the strategy among a sample of four housing organizations (two from Chicago and two from Indiana). We will collect and analyze both qualitative and quantitative data from administration and staff. Measures of interest include causal factors affecting implementation, training outcomes, and implementation outcomes.DISCUSSION: This project is an important first step in the development of an evidence-based implementation strategy to increase scalability and impact of the HFM. The project also has strong potential to increase limited scientific knowledge regarding implementation strategies in general.

AB - BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of scientifically designed and tested implementation strategies. Such strategies are particularly important for highly complex interventions that require coordination between multiple parts to be successful. This paper presents a protocol for the development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex intervention known as the Housing First model (HFM). Housing First is an evidence-based practice for chronically homeless individuals demonstrated to significantly improve a number of outcomes.METHODS/DESIGN: Drawing on practices demonstrated to be useful in implementation and e-learning theory, our team is currently adapting a face-to-face implementation strategy so that it can be delivered over a distance. Research activities will be divided between Chicago and Central Indiana, two areas with significantly different barriers to HFM implementation. Ten housing providers (five from Chicago and five from Indiana) will be recruited to conduct an alpha test of each of four e-learning modules as they are developed. Providers will be requested to keep a detailed log of their experience completing the modules and participate in one of two focus groups. After refining the modules based on alpha test results, we will test the strategy among a sample of four housing organizations (two from Chicago and two from Indiana). We will collect and analyze both qualitative and quantitative data from administration and staff. Measures of interest include causal factors affecting implementation, training outcomes, and implementation outcomes.DISCUSSION: This project is an important first step in the development of an evidence-based implementation strategy to increase scalability and impact of the HFM. The project also has strong potential to increase limited scientific knowledge regarding implementation strategies in general.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928704526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928704526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-014-0138-4

DO - 10.1186/s13012-014-0138-4

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 138

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

ER -