Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Admission After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Gregory A. Coté, Sheryl Lynch, Jeffery J. Easler, Alyson Keen, Patricia A. Vassell, Stuart Sherman, Siu Hui, Huiping Xu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background & Aims: In outpatients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with anesthesia, rates of and risk factors for admission are unclear. We aimed to develop a model that would allow physicians to predict hospitalization of patients during postanesthesia recovery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of data from ERCPs performed on outpatients from May 2012 through October 2013 at the Indiana University School of Medicine. Medical records were abstracted for preanesthesia, intra-anesthesia, and early (within the first hour) postanesthesia characteristics potentially associated with admission. Significant factors associated with admission were incorporated into a logistic regression model to identify subgroups with low, moderate, or high probabilities for admission. The population was divided into training (first 12 months) and validation (last 6 months) sets to develop and test the model. Results: We identified 3424 ERCPs during the study period; 10.7% of patients were admitted to the hospital, and 3.7% developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. Postanesthesia recovery times were significantly longer for patients requiring admission (362.6 ± 213.0 minutes vs 218.4 ± 71.8 minutes for patients not admitted; P <.0001). A higher proportion of admitted patients had high-risk indications. Admitted patients also had more severe comorbidities, higher baseline levels of pain, longer procedure times, performance of sphincter of Oddi manometry, higher pain during the first hour after anesthesia, and greater use of opiates or anxiolytics. A multivariate regression model identified patients who were admitted with a high level of accuracy in the training set (area under the curve, 0.83) and fair accuracy in the validation set (area under the curve, 0.78). On the basis of this model, nearly 50% of patients could be classified as low risk for admission. Conclusion: By using factors that can be assessed through the first hour after ERCP, we developed a model that accurately predicts which patients are likely to be admitted to the hospital. Rates of admission after outpatient ERCP are low, so a policy of prolonged observation might be unnecessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2323-2332.e9
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume13
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Outpatients
Anesthesia
Area Under Curve
Opiate Alkaloids
Logistic Models
Sphincter of Oddi
Pain
Patient Admission
Anti-Anxiety Agents
Manometry
Pancreatitis
Medical Records
Comorbidity
Hospitalization
Retrospective Studies
Observation
Medicine
Physicians
Population

Keywords

  • Complication
  • Pancreas
  • Risk Factors
  • Sedation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology

Cite this

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Admission After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. / Coté, Gregory A.; Lynch, Sheryl; Easler, Jeffery J.; Keen, Alyson; Vassell, Patricia A.; Sherman, Stuart; Hui, Siu; Xu, Huiping.

In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 13, No. 13, 01.12.2015, p. 2323-2332.e9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coté, Gregory A. ; Lynch, Sheryl ; Easler, Jeffery J. ; Keen, Alyson ; Vassell, Patricia A. ; Sherman, Stuart ; Hui, Siu ; Xu, Huiping. / Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Admission After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 13. pp. 2323-2332.e9.
@article{1b4b529d45874ad6a7826d4a636fbae9,
title = "Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Admission After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography",
abstract = "Background & Aims: In outpatients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with anesthesia, rates of and risk factors for admission are unclear. We aimed to develop a model that would allow physicians to predict hospitalization of patients during postanesthesia recovery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of data from ERCPs performed on outpatients from May 2012 through October 2013 at the Indiana University School of Medicine. Medical records were abstracted for preanesthesia, intra-anesthesia, and early (within the first hour) postanesthesia characteristics potentially associated with admission. Significant factors associated with admission were incorporated into a logistic regression model to identify subgroups with low, moderate, or high probabilities for admission. The population was divided into training (first 12 months) and validation (last 6 months) sets to develop and test the model. Results: We identified 3424 ERCPs during the study period; 10.7{\%} of patients were admitted to the hospital, and 3.7{\%} developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. Postanesthesia recovery times were significantly longer for patients requiring admission (362.6 ± 213.0 minutes vs 218.4 ± 71.8 minutes for patients not admitted; P <.0001). A higher proportion of admitted patients had high-risk indications. Admitted patients also had more severe comorbidities, higher baseline levels of pain, longer procedure times, performance of sphincter of Oddi manometry, higher pain during the first hour after anesthesia, and greater use of opiates or anxiolytics. A multivariate regression model identified patients who were admitted with a high level of accuracy in the training set (area under the curve, 0.83) and fair accuracy in the validation set (area under the curve, 0.78). On the basis of this model, nearly 50{\%} of patients could be classified as low risk for admission. Conclusion: By using factors that can be assessed through the first hour after ERCP, we developed a model that accurately predicts which patients are likely to be admitted to the hospital. Rates of admission after outpatient ERCP are low, so a policy of prolonged observation might be unnecessary.",
keywords = "Complication, Pancreas, Risk Factors, Sedation",
author = "Cot{\'e}, {Gregory A.} and Sheryl Lynch and Easler, {Jeffery J.} and Alyson Keen and Vassell, {Patricia A.} and Stuart Sherman and Siu Hui and Huiping Xu",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "2323--2332.e9",
journal = "Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "1542-3565",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Admission After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

AU - Coté, Gregory A.

AU - Lynch, Sheryl

AU - Easler, Jeffery J.

AU - Keen, Alyson

AU - Vassell, Patricia A.

AU - Sherman, Stuart

AU - Hui, Siu

AU - Xu, Huiping

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Background & Aims: In outpatients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with anesthesia, rates of and risk factors for admission are unclear. We aimed to develop a model that would allow physicians to predict hospitalization of patients during postanesthesia recovery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of data from ERCPs performed on outpatients from May 2012 through October 2013 at the Indiana University School of Medicine. Medical records were abstracted for preanesthesia, intra-anesthesia, and early (within the first hour) postanesthesia characteristics potentially associated with admission. Significant factors associated with admission were incorporated into a logistic regression model to identify subgroups with low, moderate, or high probabilities for admission. The population was divided into training (first 12 months) and validation (last 6 months) sets to develop and test the model. Results: We identified 3424 ERCPs during the study period; 10.7% of patients were admitted to the hospital, and 3.7% developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. Postanesthesia recovery times were significantly longer for patients requiring admission (362.6 ± 213.0 minutes vs 218.4 ± 71.8 minutes for patients not admitted; P <.0001). A higher proportion of admitted patients had high-risk indications. Admitted patients also had more severe comorbidities, higher baseline levels of pain, longer procedure times, performance of sphincter of Oddi manometry, higher pain during the first hour after anesthesia, and greater use of opiates or anxiolytics. A multivariate regression model identified patients who were admitted with a high level of accuracy in the training set (area under the curve, 0.83) and fair accuracy in the validation set (area under the curve, 0.78). On the basis of this model, nearly 50% of patients could be classified as low risk for admission. Conclusion: By using factors that can be assessed through the first hour after ERCP, we developed a model that accurately predicts which patients are likely to be admitted to the hospital. Rates of admission after outpatient ERCP are low, so a policy of prolonged observation might be unnecessary.

AB - Background & Aims: In outpatients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with anesthesia, rates of and risk factors for admission are unclear. We aimed to develop a model that would allow physicians to predict hospitalization of patients during postanesthesia recovery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of data from ERCPs performed on outpatients from May 2012 through October 2013 at the Indiana University School of Medicine. Medical records were abstracted for preanesthesia, intra-anesthesia, and early (within the first hour) postanesthesia characteristics potentially associated with admission. Significant factors associated with admission were incorporated into a logistic regression model to identify subgroups with low, moderate, or high probabilities for admission. The population was divided into training (first 12 months) and validation (last 6 months) sets to develop and test the model. Results: We identified 3424 ERCPs during the study period; 10.7% of patients were admitted to the hospital, and 3.7% developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. Postanesthesia recovery times were significantly longer for patients requiring admission (362.6 ± 213.0 minutes vs 218.4 ± 71.8 minutes for patients not admitted; P <.0001). A higher proportion of admitted patients had high-risk indications. Admitted patients also had more severe comorbidities, higher baseline levels of pain, longer procedure times, performance of sphincter of Oddi manometry, higher pain during the first hour after anesthesia, and greater use of opiates or anxiolytics. A multivariate regression model identified patients who were admitted with a high level of accuracy in the training set (area under the curve, 0.83) and fair accuracy in the validation set (area under the curve, 0.78). On the basis of this model, nearly 50% of patients could be classified as low risk for admission. Conclusion: By using factors that can be assessed through the first hour after ERCP, we developed a model that accurately predicts which patients are likely to be admitted to the hospital. Rates of admission after outpatient ERCP are low, so a policy of prolonged observation might be unnecessary.

KW - Complication

KW - Pancreas

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Sedation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947445694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947445694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.023

DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 26122761

AN - SCOPUS:84947445694

VL - 13

SP - 2323-2332.e9

JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 1542-3565

IS - 13

ER -