Development of a clinical research agenda for acute kidney injury using an international, interdisciplinary, three-step modified delphi process

John A. Kellum, Ravindra L. Mehta, Adeera Levin, Bruce Molitoris, David G. Warnock, Sudhir V. Shah, Michael Joannidis, Claudio Ronco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objectives: Although acute kidney injury is common and significantly increases the risk for intensive care unit and hospital mortality, little is known about its true incidence or how it can be prevented. Furthermore, key unanswered questions remain about the optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute kidney injury. An international, consensus-based, prioritized research agenda was sought to guide clinical and translational research in acute kidney injury. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A three-step modified Delphi process involving 43 participants representing 19 professional societies, organizations, and multiple stakeholder groups ranging from clinical practice to basic science research was conducted. Results: Twenty research questions were generated across six focus groups. Overall, research priorities generated from nephrologists and intensivists were similar and highly correlated. The stakeholder groups included members from 15 countries. Results from adult and pediatric groups showed important differences, as did results from developing compared with developed countries; however the priority rankings from the developed and developing countries were significantly correlated. Top research priorities in acute kidney injury include determining optimal timing of renal replacement therapy and improving the understanding of the epidemiology of acute kidney injury around the world. Conclusions: Research recommendations that are highly consistent across various stakeholder groups and between developed and developing countries have been produced. It is hoped that these recommendations will prove valuable in guiding future clinical and translational research in this area.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)887-894
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Acute Kidney Injury
Research
Developed Countries
Translational Medical Research
Developing Countries
Renal Replacement Therapy
Hospital Mortality
Focus Groups
Intensive Care Units
Epidemiology
Pediatrics
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation
  • Epidemiology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Development of a clinical research agenda for acute kidney injury using an international, interdisciplinary, three-step modified delphi process. / Kellum, John A.; Mehta, Ravindra L.; Levin, Adeera; Molitoris, Bruce; Warnock, David G.; Shah, Sudhir V.; Joannidis, Michael; Ronco, Claudio.

In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol. 3, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 887-894.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kellum, John A. ; Mehta, Ravindra L. ; Levin, Adeera ; Molitoris, Bruce ; Warnock, David G. ; Shah, Sudhir V. ; Joannidis, Michael ; Ronco, Claudio. / Development of a clinical research agenda for acute kidney injury using an international, interdisciplinary, three-step modified delphi process. In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2008 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 887-894.
@article{9433df9ad70444ef9a4cea5ab97c9844,
title = "Development of a clinical research agenda for acute kidney injury using an international, interdisciplinary, three-step modified delphi process",
abstract = "Background and objectives: Although acute kidney injury is common and significantly increases the risk for intensive care unit and hospital mortality, little is known about its true incidence or how it can be prevented. Furthermore, key unanswered questions remain about the optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute kidney injury. An international, consensus-based, prioritized research agenda was sought to guide clinical and translational research in acute kidney injury. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A three-step modified Delphi process involving 43 participants representing 19 professional societies, organizations, and multiple stakeholder groups ranging from clinical practice to basic science research was conducted. Results: Twenty research questions were generated across six focus groups. Overall, research priorities generated from nephrologists and intensivists were similar and highly correlated. The stakeholder groups included members from 15 countries. Results from adult and pediatric groups showed important differences, as did results from developing compared with developed countries; however the priority rankings from the developed and developing countries were significantly correlated. Top research priorities in acute kidney injury include determining optimal timing of renal replacement therapy and improving the understanding of the epidemiology of acute kidney injury around the world. Conclusions: Research recommendations that are highly consistent across various stakeholder groups and between developed and developing countries have been produced. It is hoped that these recommendations will prove valuable in guiding future clinical and translational research in this area.",
author = "Kellum, {John A.} and Mehta, {Ravindra L.} and Adeera Levin and Bruce Molitoris and Warnock, {David G.} and Shah, {Sudhir V.} and Michael Joannidis and Claudio Ronco",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.2215/CJN.04891107",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "887--894",
journal = "Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN",
issn = "1555-9041",
publisher = "American Society of Nephrology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a clinical research agenda for acute kidney injury using an international, interdisciplinary, three-step modified delphi process

AU - Kellum, John A.

AU - Mehta, Ravindra L.

AU - Levin, Adeera

AU - Molitoris, Bruce

AU - Warnock, David G.

AU - Shah, Sudhir V.

AU - Joannidis, Michael

AU - Ronco, Claudio

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Background and objectives: Although acute kidney injury is common and significantly increases the risk for intensive care unit and hospital mortality, little is known about its true incidence or how it can be prevented. Furthermore, key unanswered questions remain about the optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute kidney injury. An international, consensus-based, prioritized research agenda was sought to guide clinical and translational research in acute kidney injury. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A three-step modified Delphi process involving 43 participants representing 19 professional societies, organizations, and multiple stakeholder groups ranging from clinical practice to basic science research was conducted. Results: Twenty research questions were generated across six focus groups. Overall, research priorities generated from nephrologists and intensivists were similar and highly correlated. The stakeholder groups included members from 15 countries. Results from adult and pediatric groups showed important differences, as did results from developing compared with developed countries; however the priority rankings from the developed and developing countries were significantly correlated. Top research priorities in acute kidney injury include determining optimal timing of renal replacement therapy and improving the understanding of the epidemiology of acute kidney injury around the world. Conclusions: Research recommendations that are highly consistent across various stakeholder groups and between developed and developing countries have been produced. It is hoped that these recommendations will prove valuable in guiding future clinical and translational research in this area.

AB - Background and objectives: Although acute kidney injury is common and significantly increases the risk for intensive care unit and hospital mortality, little is known about its true incidence or how it can be prevented. Furthermore, key unanswered questions remain about the optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute kidney injury. An international, consensus-based, prioritized research agenda was sought to guide clinical and translational research in acute kidney injury. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A three-step modified Delphi process involving 43 participants representing 19 professional societies, organizations, and multiple stakeholder groups ranging from clinical practice to basic science research was conducted. Results: Twenty research questions were generated across six focus groups. Overall, research priorities generated from nephrologists and intensivists were similar and highly correlated. The stakeholder groups included members from 15 countries. Results from adult and pediatric groups showed important differences, as did results from developing compared with developed countries; however the priority rankings from the developed and developing countries were significantly correlated. Top research priorities in acute kidney injury include determining optimal timing of renal replacement therapy and improving the understanding of the epidemiology of acute kidney injury around the world. Conclusions: Research recommendations that are highly consistent across various stakeholder groups and between developed and developing countries have been produced. It is hoped that these recommendations will prove valuable in guiding future clinical and translational research in this area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649182910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44649182910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2215/CJN.04891107

DO - 10.2215/CJN.04891107

M3 - Article

C2 - 18216348

AN - SCOPUS:44649182910

VL - 3

SP - 887

EP - 894

JO - Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN

JF - Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN

SN - 1555-9041

IS - 3

ER -