Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Claire E. Barber, Jatin N. Patel, Linda Woodhouse, Christopher Smith, Stephen Weiss, Joanne Homik, Sharon LeClercq, Dianne Mosher, Tanya Christiansen, Jane Squire Howden, Tracy Wasylak, James Greenwood-Lee, Andrea Emrick, Esther Suter, Barb Kathol, Dmitry Khodyakov, Sean Grant, Denise Campbell-Scherer, Leah Phillips, Jennifer HendricksDeborah A. Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Centralized intake is integral to healthcare systems to support timely access to appropriate health services. The aim of this study was to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate centralized intake systems for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Phase 1 involved stakeholder meetings including healthcare providers, managers, researchers and patients to obtain input on candidate KPIs, aligned along six quality dimensions: appropriateness, accessibility, acceptability, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety. Phase 2 involved literature reviews to ensure KPIs were based on best practices and harmonized with existing measures. Phase 3 involved a three-round, online modified Delphi panel to finalize the KPIs. The panel consisted of two rounds of rating and a round of online and in-person discussions. KPIs rated as valid and important (≥7 on a 9-point Likert scale) were included in the final set. Results: Twenty-five KPIs identified and substantiated during Phases 1 and 2 were submitted to 27 panellists including healthcare providers, managers, researchers, and patients in Phase 3. After the in-person meeting, three KPIs were removed and six were suggested. The final set includes 9 OA KPIs, 10 RA KPIs and 9 relating to centralized intake processes for both conditions. All 28 KPIs were rated as valid and important. Conclusions: Arthritis stakeholders have proposed 28 KPIs that should be used in quality improvement efforts when evaluating centralized intake for OA and RA. The KPIs measure five of the six dimensions of quality and are relevant to patients, practitioners and health systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number322
JournalArthritis Research and Therapy
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 14 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Osteoarthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Health Personnel
Research Personnel
Quality Improvement
Practice Guidelines
Health Services
Arthritis
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Health

Keywords

  • Health services research
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. / Barber, Claire E.; Patel, Jatin N.; Woodhouse, Linda; Smith, Christopher; Weiss, Stephen; Homik, Joanne; LeClercq, Sharon; Mosher, Dianne; Christiansen, Tanya; Howden, Jane Squire; Wasylak, Tracy; Greenwood-Lee, James; Emrick, Andrea; Suter, Esther; Kathol, Barb; Khodyakov, Dmitry; Grant, Sean; Campbell-Scherer, Denise; Phillips, Leah; Hendricks, Jennifer; Marshall, Deborah A.

In: Arthritis Research and Therapy, Vol. 17, No. 1, 322, 14.11.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barber, CE, Patel, JN, Woodhouse, L, Smith, C, Weiss, S, Homik, J, LeClercq, S, Mosher, D, Christiansen, T, Howden, JS, Wasylak, T, Greenwood-Lee, J, Emrick, A, Suter, E, Kathol, B, Khodyakov, D, Grant, S, Campbell-Scherer, D, Phillips, L, Hendricks, J & Marshall, DA 2015, 'Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis', Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 17, no. 1, 322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0843-7
Barber, Claire E. ; Patel, Jatin N. ; Woodhouse, Linda ; Smith, Christopher ; Weiss, Stephen ; Homik, Joanne ; LeClercq, Sharon ; Mosher, Dianne ; Christiansen, Tanya ; Howden, Jane Squire ; Wasylak, Tracy ; Greenwood-Lee, James ; Emrick, Andrea ; Suter, Esther ; Kathol, Barb ; Khodyakov, Dmitry ; Grant, Sean ; Campbell-Scherer, Denise ; Phillips, Leah ; Hendricks, Jennifer ; Marshall, Deborah A. / Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. In: Arthritis Research and Therapy. 2015 ; Vol. 17, No. 1.
@article{092f92adeff44a1f972209fc95b55cad,
title = "Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis",
abstract = "Introduction: Centralized intake is integral to healthcare systems to support timely access to appropriate health services. The aim of this study was to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate centralized intake systems for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Phase 1 involved stakeholder meetings including healthcare providers, managers, researchers and patients to obtain input on candidate KPIs, aligned along six quality dimensions: appropriateness, accessibility, acceptability, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety. Phase 2 involved literature reviews to ensure KPIs were based on best practices and harmonized with existing measures. Phase 3 involved a three-round, online modified Delphi panel to finalize the KPIs. The panel consisted of two rounds of rating and a round of online and in-person discussions. KPIs rated as valid and important (≥7 on a 9-point Likert scale) were included in the final set. Results: Twenty-five KPIs identified and substantiated during Phases 1 and 2 were submitted to 27 panellists including healthcare providers, managers, researchers, and patients in Phase 3. After the in-person meeting, three KPIs were removed and six were suggested. The final set includes 9 OA KPIs, 10 RA KPIs and 9 relating to centralized intake processes for both conditions. All 28 KPIs were rated as valid and important. Conclusions: Arthritis stakeholders have proposed 28 KPIs that should be used in quality improvement efforts when evaluating centralized intake for OA and RA. The KPIs measure five of the six dimensions of quality and are relevant to patients, practitioners and health systems.",
keywords = "Health services research, Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis",
author = "Barber, {Claire E.} and Patel, {Jatin N.} and Linda Woodhouse and Christopher Smith and Stephen Weiss and Joanne Homik and Sharon LeClercq and Dianne Mosher and Tanya Christiansen and Howden, {Jane Squire} and Tracy Wasylak and James Greenwood-Lee and Andrea Emrick and Esther Suter and Barb Kathol and Dmitry Khodyakov and Sean Grant and Denise Campbell-Scherer and Leah Phillips and Jennifer Hendricks and Marshall, {Deborah A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1186/s13075-015-0843-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "Arthritis Research and Therapy",
issn = "1478-6354",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

AU - Barber, Claire E.

AU - Patel, Jatin N.

AU - Woodhouse, Linda

AU - Smith, Christopher

AU - Weiss, Stephen

AU - Homik, Joanne

AU - LeClercq, Sharon

AU - Mosher, Dianne

AU - Christiansen, Tanya

AU - Howden, Jane Squire

AU - Wasylak, Tracy

AU - Greenwood-Lee, James

AU - Emrick, Andrea

AU - Suter, Esther

AU - Kathol, Barb

AU - Khodyakov, Dmitry

AU - Grant, Sean

AU - Campbell-Scherer, Denise

AU - Phillips, Leah

AU - Hendricks, Jennifer

AU - Marshall, Deborah A.

PY - 2015/11/14

Y1 - 2015/11/14

N2 - Introduction: Centralized intake is integral to healthcare systems to support timely access to appropriate health services. The aim of this study was to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate centralized intake systems for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Phase 1 involved stakeholder meetings including healthcare providers, managers, researchers and patients to obtain input on candidate KPIs, aligned along six quality dimensions: appropriateness, accessibility, acceptability, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety. Phase 2 involved literature reviews to ensure KPIs were based on best practices and harmonized with existing measures. Phase 3 involved a three-round, online modified Delphi panel to finalize the KPIs. The panel consisted of two rounds of rating and a round of online and in-person discussions. KPIs rated as valid and important (≥7 on a 9-point Likert scale) were included in the final set. Results: Twenty-five KPIs identified and substantiated during Phases 1 and 2 were submitted to 27 panellists including healthcare providers, managers, researchers, and patients in Phase 3. After the in-person meeting, three KPIs were removed and six were suggested. The final set includes 9 OA KPIs, 10 RA KPIs and 9 relating to centralized intake processes for both conditions. All 28 KPIs were rated as valid and important. Conclusions: Arthritis stakeholders have proposed 28 KPIs that should be used in quality improvement efforts when evaluating centralized intake for OA and RA. The KPIs measure five of the six dimensions of quality and are relevant to patients, practitioners and health systems.

AB - Introduction: Centralized intake is integral to healthcare systems to support timely access to appropriate health services. The aim of this study was to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate centralized intake systems for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Phase 1 involved stakeholder meetings including healthcare providers, managers, researchers and patients to obtain input on candidate KPIs, aligned along six quality dimensions: appropriateness, accessibility, acceptability, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety. Phase 2 involved literature reviews to ensure KPIs were based on best practices and harmonized with existing measures. Phase 3 involved a three-round, online modified Delphi panel to finalize the KPIs. The panel consisted of two rounds of rating and a round of online and in-person discussions. KPIs rated as valid and important (≥7 on a 9-point Likert scale) were included in the final set. Results: Twenty-five KPIs identified and substantiated during Phases 1 and 2 were submitted to 27 panellists including healthcare providers, managers, researchers, and patients in Phase 3. After the in-person meeting, three KPIs were removed and six were suggested. The final set includes 9 OA KPIs, 10 RA KPIs and 9 relating to centralized intake processes for both conditions. All 28 KPIs were rated as valid and important. Conclusions: Arthritis stakeholders have proposed 28 KPIs that should be used in quality improvement efforts when evaluating centralized intake for OA and RA. The KPIs measure five of the six dimensions of quality and are relevant to patients, practitioners and health systems.

KW - Health services research

KW - Osteoarthritis

KW - Rheumatoid arthritis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946824587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946824587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13075-015-0843-7

DO - 10.1186/s13075-015-0843-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 26568556

AN - SCOPUS:84946824587

VL - 17

JO - Arthritis Research and Therapy

JF - Arthritis Research and Therapy

SN - 1478-6354

IS - 1

M1 - 322

ER -