Diagnostic interview for genetic studies: Rationale, unique features, and training

J. I. Nurnberger, M. C. Blehar, C. A. Kaufmann, C. York-Cooler, S. G. Simpson, J. Harkavy-Friedman, J. B. Severe, D. Malaspina, T. Reich, M. Miller, E. S. Bowman, J. R. DePaulo, C. R. Cloninger, G. Robinson, S. Moldin, E. S. Gershon, M. E. Maxwell, J. J. Guroff, D. Kirch

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1638 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reports on the development and reliability of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), a clinical interview especially constructed for the assessment of major mood and psychotic disorders and their spectrum conditions. The DIGS, which was developed and piloted as a collaborative effort of investigators from sites in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Genetics Initiative, has the following additional features: (1) polydiagnostic capacity; (2) a detailed assessment of the course of the illness, chronology of psychotic and mood syndromes, and comorbidity; (3) additional phenomenologic assessments of symptoms; and (4) algorithmic scoring capability. The DIGS is designed to be employed by interviewers who exercise significant clinical judgment and who summarize information in narrative form as well as in ratings. A two-phase test-retest (within-site, between-site) reliability study was carried out for DSM-III-R criteria-based major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Reliabilities using algorithms were excellent (0.73 to 0.95), except for schizoaffective disorder, for which disagreement on estimates of duration of mood syndromes relative to psychosis reduced reliability. A final best-estimate process using medical records and information from relatives as well as algorithmic diagnoses is expected to be more reliable in making these distinctions. The DIGS should be useful as part of archival data gathering for genetic studies of major affective disorders, schizophrenia, and related conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)849-859+863-864
JournalArchives of general psychiatry
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Interviews
Psychotic Disorders
Schizophrenia
Psychotic Affective Disorders
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Chronology
Symptom Assessment
Mood Disorders
Bipolar Disorder
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Medical Records
Comorbidity
Research Personnel
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Nurnberger, J. I., Blehar, M. C., Kaufmann, C. A., York-Cooler, C., Simpson, S. G., Harkavy-Friedman, J., ... Kirch, D. (1994). Diagnostic interview for genetic studies: Rationale, unique features, and training. Archives of general psychiatry, 51(11), 849-859+863-864. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002

Diagnostic interview for genetic studies : Rationale, unique features, and training. / Nurnberger, J. I.; Blehar, M. C.; Kaufmann, C. A.; York-Cooler, C.; Simpson, S. G.; Harkavy-Friedman, J.; Severe, J. B.; Malaspina, D.; Reich, T.; Miller, M.; Bowman, E. S.; DePaulo, J. R.; Cloninger, C. R.; Robinson, G.; Moldin, S.; Gershon, E. S.; Maxwell, M. E.; Guroff, J. J.; Kirch, D.

In: Archives of general psychiatry, Vol. 51, No. 11, 01.01.1994, p. 849-859+863-864.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Nurnberger, JI, Blehar, MC, Kaufmann, CA, York-Cooler, C, Simpson, SG, Harkavy-Friedman, J, Severe, JB, Malaspina, D, Reich, T, Miller, M, Bowman, ES, DePaulo, JR, Cloninger, CR, Robinson, G, Moldin, S, Gershon, ES, Maxwell, ME, Guroff, JJ & Kirch, D 1994, 'Diagnostic interview for genetic studies: Rationale, unique features, and training', Archives of general psychiatry, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 849-859+863-864. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002
Nurnberger JI, Blehar MC, Kaufmann CA, York-Cooler C, Simpson SG, Harkavy-Friedman J et al. Diagnostic interview for genetic studies: Rationale, unique features, and training. Archives of general psychiatry. 1994 Jan 1;51(11):849-859+863-864. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002
Nurnberger, J. I. ; Blehar, M. C. ; Kaufmann, C. A. ; York-Cooler, C. ; Simpson, S. G. ; Harkavy-Friedman, J. ; Severe, J. B. ; Malaspina, D. ; Reich, T. ; Miller, M. ; Bowman, E. S. ; DePaulo, J. R. ; Cloninger, C. R. ; Robinson, G. ; Moldin, S. ; Gershon, E. S. ; Maxwell, M. E. ; Guroff, J. J. ; Kirch, D. / Diagnostic interview for genetic studies : Rationale, unique features, and training. In: Archives of general psychiatry. 1994 ; Vol. 51, No. 11. pp. 849-859+863-864.
@article{2cda66cf674e4d58a900489d3dab7db5,
title = "Diagnostic interview for genetic studies: Rationale, unique features, and training",
abstract = "This article reports on the development and reliability of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), a clinical interview especially constructed for the assessment of major mood and psychotic disorders and their spectrum conditions. The DIGS, which was developed and piloted as a collaborative effort of investigators from sites in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Genetics Initiative, has the following additional features: (1) polydiagnostic capacity; (2) a detailed assessment of the course of the illness, chronology of psychotic and mood syndromes, and comorbidity; (3) additional phenomenologic assessments of symptoms; and (4) algorithmic scoring capability. The DIGS is designed to be employed by interviewers who exercise significant clinical judgment and who summarize information in narrative form as well as in ratings. A two-phase test-retest (within-site, between-site) reliability study was carried out for DSM-III-R criteria-based major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Reliabilities using algorithms were excellent (0.73 to 0.95), except for schizoaffective disorder, for which disagreement on estimates of duration of mood syndromes relative to psychosis reduced reliability. A final best-estimate process using medical records and information from relatives as well as algorithmic diagnoses is expected to be more reliable in making these distinctions. The DIGS should be useful as part of archival data gathering for genetic studies of major affective disorders, schizophrenia, and related conditions.",
author = "Nurnberger, {J. I.} and Blehar, {M. C.} and Kaufmann, {C. A.} and C. York-Cooler and Simpson, {S. G.} and J. Harkavy-Friedman and Severe, {J. B.} and D. Malaspina and T. Reich and M. Miller and Bowman, {E. S.} and DePaulo, {J. R.} and Cloninger, {C. R.} and G. Robinson and S. Moldin and Gershon, {E. S.} and Maxwell, {M. E.} and Guroff, {J. J.} and D. Kirch",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "849--859+863--864",
journal = "JAMA Psychiatry",
issn = "2168-622X",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic interview for genetic studies

T2 - Rationale, unique features, and training

AU - Nurnberger, J. I.

AU - Blehar, M. C.

AU - Kaufmann, C. A.

AU - York-Cooler, C.

AU - Simpson, S. G.

AU - Harkavy-Friedman, J.

AU - Severe, J. B.

AU - Malaspina, D.

AU - Reich, T.

AU - Miller, M.

AU - Bowman, E. S.

AU - DePaulo, J. R.

AU - Cloninger, C. R.

AU - Robinson, G.

AU - Moldin, S.

AU - Gershon, E. S.

AU - Maxwell, M. E.

AU - Guroff, J. J.

AU - Kirch, D.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - This article reports on the development and reliability of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), a clinical interview especially constructed for the assessment of major mood and psychotic disorders and their spectrum conditions. The DIGS, which was developed and piloted as a collaborative effort of investigators from sites in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Genetics Initiative, has the following additional features: (1) polydiagnostic capacity; (2) a detailed assessment of the course of the illness, chronology of psychotic and mood syndromes, and comorbidity; (3) additional phenomenologic assessments of symptoms; and (4) algorithmic scoring capability. The DIGS is designed to be employed by interviewers who exercise significant clinical judgment and who summarize information in narrative form as well as in ratings. A two-phase test-retest (within-site, between-site) reliability study was carried out for DSM-III-R criteria-based major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Reliabilities using algorithms were excellent (0.73 to 0.95), except for schizoaffective disorder, for which disagreement on estimates of duration of mood syndromes relative to psychosis reduced reliability. A final best-estimate process using medical records and information from relatives as well as algorithmic diagnoses is expected to be more reliable in making these distinctions. The DIGS should be useful as part of archival data gathering for genetic studies of major affective disorders, schizophrenia, and related conditions.

AB - This article reports on the development and reliability of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), a clinical interview especially constructed for the assessment of major mood and psychotic disorders and their spectrum conditions. The DIGS, which was developed and piloted as a collaborative effort of investigators from sites in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Genetics Initiative, has the following additional features: (1) polydiagnostic capacity; (2) a detailed assessment of the course of the illness, chronology of psychotic and mood syndromes, and comorbidity; (3) additional phenomenologic assessments of symptoms; and (4) algorithmic scoring capability. The DIGS is designed to be employed by interviewers who exercise significant clinical judgment and who summarize information in narrative form as well as in ratings. A two-phase test-retest (within-site, between-site) reliability study was carried out for DSM-III-R criteria-based major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Reliabilities using algorithms were excellent (0.73 to 0.95), except for schizoaffective disorder, for which disagreement on estimates of duration of mood syndromes relative to psychosis reduced reliability. A final best-estimate process using medical records and information from relatives as well as algorithmic diagnoses is expected to be more reliable in making these distinctions. The DIGS should be useful as part of archival data gathering for genetic studies of major affective disorders, schizophrenia, and related conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028134880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028134880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002

DO - 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002

M3 - Review article

C2 - 7944874

AN - SCOPUS:0028134880

VL - 51

SP - 849-859+863-864

JO - JAMA Psychiatry

JF - JAMA Psychiatry

SN - 2168-622X

IS - 11

ER -