Differences among geriatricians, general internists, and cardiologists in the care of patients with heart failure

A cautionary tale of quality assessment

Marshall H. Chin, John C. Wang, James X. Zhang, Greg Sachs, Roberto M. Lang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe differences in the characteristics, processes of care, and resource utilization of patients with heart failure cared for by geriatricians, general internists, cardiologists, and combinations of physicians. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 439 outpatients with a billing diagnosis of heart failure or cardiomyopathy who were treated by geriatricians, general internists, cardiologists, and combinations of physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and clinical characteristics, medication use, diagnostic testing, hospitalizations, and inpatient and outpatient costs were measured. RESULTS: Compared with patients of cardiologists, patients cared for by geriatricians were older, more likely to have hypertension, diastolic dysfunction, and high comorbidity, and less likely to undergo echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and electrocardiography. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was similar among patients with reduced systolic function. Patients cared for by geriatricians had the same costs, rates of hospitalization, and likelihood of being symptomatic as patients of cardiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The processes of care for patients with heart failure seen solely by geriatricians differ from those for patients seen by other physicians, but the case-mix also varies. Assessment of left ventricular function by geriatricians probably needs to be increased. However, although they were older and had more comorbidity, patients of geriatricians had total costs and symptomatology similar to those of patients of cardiologists. Future work is needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from treatment by geriatricians and to determine how care can be optimally coordinated among different types of physicians and health providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1349-1354
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume46
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Care
Heart Failure
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Comorbidity
Hospitalization
Outpatients
Cardiologists
Geriatricians
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Cardiac Catheterization
Cardiomyopathies
Left Ventricular Function
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Echocardiography
Inpatients
Electrocardiography
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Differences among geriatricians, general internists, and cardiologists in the care of patients with heart failure : A cautionary tale of quality assessment. / Chin, Marshall H.; Wang, John C.; Zhang, James X.; Sachs, Greg; Lang, Roberto M.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 46, No. 11, 11.1998, p. 1349-1354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25048188aa0f41c5bb00b7a755ce5e92,
title = "Differences among geriatricians, general internists, and cardiologists in the care of patients with heart failure: A cautionary tale of quality assessment",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To describe differences in the characteristics, processes of care, and resource utilization of patients with heart failure cared for by geriatricians, general internists, cardiologists, and combinations of physicians. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 439 outpatients with a billing diagnosis of heart failure or cardiomyopathy who were treated by geriatricians, general internists, cardiologists, and combinations of physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and clinical characteristics, medication use, diagnostic testing, hospitalizations, and inpatient and outpatient costs were measured. RESULTS: Compared with patients of cardiologists, patients cared for by geriatricians were older, more likely to have hypertension, diastolic dysfunction, and high comorbidity, and less likely to undergo echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and electrocardiography. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was similar among patients with reduced systolic function. Patients cared for by geriatricians had the same costs, rates of hospitalization, and likelihood of being symptomatic as patients of cardiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The processes of care for patients with heart failure seen solely by geriatricians differ from those for patients seen by other physicians, but the case-mix also varies. Assessment of left ventricular function by geriatricians probably needs to be increased. However, although they were older and had more comorbidity, patients of geriatricians had total costs and symptomatology similar to those of patients of cardiologists. Future work is needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from treatment by geriatricians and to determine how care can be optimally coordinated among different types of physicians and health providers.",
author = "Chin, {Marshall H.} and Wang, {John C.} and Zhang, {James X.} and Greg Sachs and Lang, {Roberto M.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1349--1354",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences among geriatricians, general internists, and cardiologists in the care of patients with heart failure

T2 - A cautionary tale of quality assessment

AU - Chin, Marshall H.

AU - Wang, John C.

AU - Zhang, James X.

AU - Sachs, Greg

AU - Lang, Roberto M.

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To describe differences in the characteristics, processes of care, and resource utilization of patients with heart failure cared for by geriatricians, general internists, cardiologists, and combinations of physicians. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 439 outpatients with a billing diagnosis of heart failure or cardiomyopathy who were treated by geriatricians, general internists, cardiologists, and combinations of physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and clinical characteristics, medication use, diagnostic testing, hospitalizations, and inpatient and outpatient costs were measured. RESULTS: Compared with patients of cardiologists, patients cared for by geriatricians were older, more likely to have hypertension, diastolic dysfunction, and high comorbidity, and less likely to undergo echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and electrocardiography. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was similar among patients with reduced systolic function. Patients cared for by geriatricians had the same costs, rates of hospitalization, and likelihood of being symptomatic as patients of cardiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The processes of care for patients with heart failure seen solely by geriatricians differ from those for patients seen by other physicians, but the case-mix also varies. Assessment of left ventricular function by geriatricians probably needs to be increased. However, although they were older and had more comorbidity, patients of geriatricians had total costs and symptomatology similar to those of patients of cardiologists. Future work is needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from treatment by geriatricians and to determine how care can be optimally coordinated among different types of physicians and health providers.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To describe differences in the characteristics, processes of care, and resource utilization of patients with heart failure cared for by geriatricians, general internists, cardiologists, and combinations of physicians. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 439 outpatients with a billing diagnosis of heart failure or cardiomyopathy who were treated by geriatricians, general internists, cardiologists, and combinations of physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and clinical characteristics, medication use, diagnostic testing, hospitalizations, and inpatient and outpatient costs were measured. RESULTS: Compared with patients of cardiologists, patients cared for by geriatricians were older, more likely to have hypertension, diastolic dysfunction, and high comorbidity, and less likely to undergo echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and electrocardiography. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was similar among patients with reduced systolic function. Patients cared for by geriatricians had the same costs, rates of hospitalization, and likelihood of being symptomatic as patients of cardiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The processes of care for patients with heart failure seen solely by geriatricians differ from those for patients seen by other physicians, but the case-mix also varies. Assessment of left ventricular function by geriatricians probably needs to be increased. However, although they were older and had more comorbidity, patients of geriatricians had total costs and symptomatology similar to those of patients of cardiologists. Future work is needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from treatment by geriatricians and to determine how care can be optimally coordinated among different types of physicians and health providers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031729466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031729466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 1349

EP - 1354

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 11

ER -