Difficulties in establishing routine amniocentesis for preterm labor evaluation

Jennifer J. McIntosh, Katherine McHugh, David Haas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

After a recent practice change implementing amniocentesis into the evaluation of preterm labor (PTL) or preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), actual performance of the procedure was tracked. Fifty-nine patients were admitted with these diagnoses. Twenty-three patients (39%) were offered amniocentesis and 36 patients (61%) were not offered amniocentesis as part of the clinical protocol. Seven (30%) patients of those offered an amniocentesis underwent the procedure. The predominant reasons for not performing an amniocentesis were patient refusal and provider discomfort. In conclusion, implementation of amniocentesis to evaluate for subclinical infection/ inflammation in the setting of PTL or PPROM proved difficult, as only 7 of 59 (11.9%) patients admitted with these diagnoses actually received an amniocentesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-314
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Amniocentesis
Premature Obstetric Labor
Asymptomatic Infections
Clinical Protocols
Inflammation

Keywords

  • Amniocentesis
  • preterm labor
  • preterm premature rupture of membranes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Difficulties in establishing routine amniocentesis for preterm labor evaluation. / McIntosh, Jennifer J.; McHugh, Katherine; Haas, David.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 313-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{792d80a3286249018a771f153bb3bf4c,
title = "Difficulties in establishing routine amniocentesis for preterm labor evaluation",
abstract = "After a recent practice change implementing amniocentesis into the evaluation of preterm labor (PTL) or preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), actual performance of the procedure was tracked. Fifty-nine patients were admitted with these diagnoses. Twenty-three patients (39{\%}) were offered amniocentesis and 36 patients (61{\%}) were not offered amniocentesis as part of the clinical protocol. Seven (30{\%}) patients of those offered an amniocentesis underwent the procedure. The predominant reasons for not performing an amniocentesis were patient refusal and provider discomfort. In conclusion, implementation of amniocentesis to evaluate for subclinical infection/ inflammation in the setting of PTL or PPROM proved difficult, as only 7 of 59 (11.9{\%}) patients admitted with these diagnoses actually received an amniocentesis.",
keywords = "Amniocentesis, preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes",
author = "McIntosh, {Jennifer J.} and Katherine McHugh and David Haas",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.3109/14767058.2011.573826",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "313--314",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Difficulties in establishing routine amniocentesis for preterm labor evaluation

AU - McIntosh, Jennifer J.

AU - McHugh, Katherine

AU - Haas, David

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - After a recent practice change implementing amniocentesis into the evaluation of preterm labor (PTL) or preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), actual performance of the procedure was tracked. Fifty-nine patients were admitted with these diagnoses. Twenty-three patients (39%) were offered amniocentesis and 36 patients (61%) were not offered amniocentesis as part of the clinical protocol. Seven (30%) patients of those offered an amniocentesis underwent the procedure. The predominant reasons for not performing an amniocentesis were patient refusal and provider discomfort. In conclusion, implementation of amniocentesis to evaluate for subclinical infection/ inflammation in the setting of PTL or PPROM proved difficult, as only 7 of 59 (11.9%) patients admitted with these diagnoses actually received an amniocentesis.

AB - After a recent practice change implementing amniocentesis into the evaluation of preterm labor (PTL) or preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), actual performance of the procedure was tracked. Fifty-nine patients were admitted with these diagnoses. Twenty-three patients (39%) were offered amniocentesis and 36 patients (61%) were not offered amniocentesis as part of the clinical protocol. Seven (30%) patients of those offered an amniocentesis underwent the procedure. The predominant reasons for not performing an amniocentesis were patient refusal and provider discomfort. In conclusion, implementation of amniocentesis to evaluate for subclinical infection/ inflammation in the setting of PTL or PPROM proved difficult, as only 7 of 59 (11.9%) patients admitted with these diagnoses actually received an amniocentesis.

KW - Amniocentesis

KW - preterm labor

KW - preterm premature rupture of membranes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856887611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856887611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14767058.2011.573826

DO - 10.3109/14767058.2011.573826

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 313

EP - 314

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

IS - 3

ER -