Digital versus light microscopy assessment of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy

Metka Volavšek, Ana Blanca, Rodolfo Montironi, Liang Cheng, Maria R. Raspollini, Nuno Vau, Jorge Fonseca, Francesco Pierconti, Antonio Lopez-Beltran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Positive surgical margin (PSM) extension reported as focal or non-focal/extensive is an important pathologic prognostic parameter after radical prostatectomy. Likewise, there is limited or no agreement on how to measure and what the best cut-off points to be used in practice are. We hypothesized that digital microscopy (DM) would potentially provide a more objective way to measure PSM and better define its clinical significance. To further our knowledge, we have evaluated PSM status in 107 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies using digital and conventional light microscopy (LM). DM evaluation detected three additional PSM cases, but no differences were seen (LM vs DM; p = 0.220). Mean linear measurement correlated to biochemical recurrence (BR) (LM, p = 0.002; DM, p = 0.001). ROC analysis identified a cut-off point to assess linear measurement by LM (3.5 mm) or DM (3.2 mm), but only digital measurement was significant for BR-free survival. Our study also evaluated a cut-off ≤ 3 mm that was associated to BR using LM (p = 0.023) or DM (p = 0.001). Finally, the number of paraffin blocks bearing PSM correlated with BR (p < 0.001) status with either LM or DM. In conclusion, DM produces similar data than LM but shows more accurate measurements. Reporting of PSM with score of ≤ 3 vs. > 3 mm linear extent using LM (3.2 mm if digital microscopy is applied) might represent an important prognostic feature after radical prostatectomy. Alternatively, reporting the number of blocks with PSM 1 vs. 2 or more might also provide important prognostic data in practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalVirchows Archiv
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 16 2018

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Microscopy
Light
Recurrence
Margins of Excision
ROC Curve
Paraffin

Keywords

  • Biochemical recurrence
  • Digital microscopy
  • Digital pathology
  • Prostate cancer
  • Radical prostatectomy
  • Surgical margin status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Volavšek, M., Blanca, A., Montironi, R., Cheng, L., Raspollini, M. R., Vau, N., ... Lopez-Beltran, A. (Accepted/In press). Digital versus light microscopy assessment of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy. Virchows Archiv, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2296-2

Digital versus light microscopy assessment of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy. / Volavšek, Metka; Blanca, Ana; Montironi, Rodolfo; Cheng, Liang; Raspollini, Maria R.; Vau, Nuno; Fonseca, Jorge; Pierconti, Francesco; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio.

In: Virchows Archiv, 16.02.2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Volavšek, M, Blanca, A, Montironi, R, Cheng, L, Raspollini, MR, Vau, N, Fonseca, J, Pierconti, F & Lopez-Beltran, A 2018, 'Digital versus light microscopy assessment of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy', Virchows Archiv, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2296-2
Volavšek, Metka ; Blanca, Ana ; Montironi, Rodolfo ; Cheng, Liang ; Raspollini, Maria R. ; Vau, Nuno ; Fonseca, Jorge ; Pierconti, Francesco ; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio. / Digital versus light microscopy assessment of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy. In: Virchows Archiv. 2018 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{1ec7faf67ebf4692baddcdcdd6107c91,
title = "Digital versus light microscopy assessment of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy",
abstract = "Positive surgical margin (PSM) extension reported as focal or non-focal/extensive is an important pathologic prognostic parameter after radical prostatectomy. Likewise, there is limited or no agreement on how to measure and what the best cut-off points to be used in practice are. We hypothesized that digital microscopy (DM) would potentially provide a more objective way to measure PSM and better define its clinical significance. To further our knowledge, we have evaluated PSM status in 107 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies using digital and conventional light microscopy (LM). DM evaluation detected three additional PSM cases, but no differences were seen (LM vs DM; p = 0.220). Mean linear measurement correlated to biochemical recurrence (BR) (LM, p = 0.002; DM, p = 0.001). ROC analysis identified a cut-off point to assess linear measurement by LM (3.5 mm) or DM (3.2 mm), but only digital measurement was significant for BR-free survival. Our study also evaluated a cut-off ≤ 3 mm that was associated to BR using LM (p = 0.023) or DM (p = 0.001). Finally, the number of paraffin blocks bearing PSM correlated with BR (p < 0.001) status with either LM or DM. In conclusion, DM produces similar data than LM but shows more accurate measurements. Reporting of PSM with score of ≤ 3 vs. > 3 mm linear extent using LM (3.2 mm if digital microscopy is applied) might represent an important prognostic feature after radical prostatectomy. Alternatively, reporting the number of blocks with PSM 1 vs. 2 or more might also provide important prognostic data in practice.",
keywords = "Biochemical recurrence, Digital microscopy, Digital pathology, Prostate cancer, Radical prostatectomy, Surgical margin status",
author = "Metka Volavšek and Ana Blanca and Rodolfo Montironi and Liang Cheng and Raspollini, {Maria R.} and Nuno Vau and Jorge Fonseca and Francesco Pierconti and Antonio Lopez-Beltran",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1007/s00428-018-2296-2",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Virchows Archiv",
issn = "0945-6317",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital versus light microscopy assessment of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy

AU - Volavšek, Metka

AU - Blanca, Ana

AU - Montironi, Rodolfo

AU - Cheng, Liang

AU - Raspollini, Maria R.

AU - Vau, Nuno

AU - Fonseca, Jorge

AU - Pierconti, Francesco

AU - Lopez-Beltran, Antonio

PY - 2018/2/16

Y1 - 2018/2/16

N2 - Positive surgical margin (PSM) extension reported as focal or non-focal/extensive is an important pathologic prognostic parameter after radical prostatectomy. Likewise, there is limited or no agreement on how to measure and what the best cut-off points to be used in practice are. We hypothesized that digital microscopy (DM) would potentially provide a more objective way to measure PSM and better define its clinical significance. To further our knowledge, we have evaluated PSM status in 107 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies using digital and conventional light microscopy (LM). DM evaluation detected three additional PSM cases, but no differences were seen (LM vs DM; p = 0.220). Mean linear measurement correlated to biochemical recurrence (BR) (LM, p = 0.002; DM, p = 0.001). ROC analysis identified a cut-off point to assess linear measurement by LM (3.5 mm) or DM (3.2 mm), but only digital measurement was significant for BR-free survival. Our study also evaluated a cut-off ≤ 3 mm that was associated to BR using LM (p = 0.023) or DM (p = 0.001). Finally, the number of paraffin blocks bearing PSM correlated with BR (p < 0.001) status with either LM or DM. In conclusion, DM produces similar data than LM but shows more accurate measurements. Reporting of PSM with score of ≤ 3 vs. > 3 mm linear extent using LM (3.2 mm if digital microscopy is applied) might represent an important prognostic feature after radical prostatectomy. Alternatively, reporting the number of blocks with PSM 1 vs. 2 or more might also provide important prognostic data in practice.

AB - Positive surgical margin (PSM) extension reported as focal or non-focal/extensive is an important pathologic prognostic parameter after radical prostatectomy. Likewise, there is limited or no agreement on how to measure and what the best cut-off points to be used in practice are. We hypothesized that digital microscopy (DM) would potentially provide a more objective way to measure PSM and better define its clinical significance. To further our knowledge, we have evaluated PSM status in 107 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies using digital and conventional light microscopy (LM). DM evaluation detected three additional PSM cases, but no differences were seen (LM vs DM; p = 0.220). Mean linear measurement correlated to biochemical recurrence (BR) (LM, p = 0.002; DM, p = 0.001). ROC analysis identified a cut-off point to assess linear measurement by LM (3.5 mm) or DM (3.2 mm), but only digital measurement was significant for BR-free survival. Our study also evaluated a cut-off ≤ 3 mm that was associated to BR using LM (p = 0.023) or DM (p = 0.001). Finally, the number of paraffin blocks bearing PSM correlated with BR (p < 0.001) status with either LM or DM. In conclusion, DM produces similar data than LM but shows more accurate measurements. Reporting of PSM with score of ≤ 3 vs. > 3 mm linear extent using LM (3.2 mm if digital microscopy is applied) might represent an important prognostic feature after radical prostatectomy. Alternatively, reporting the number of blocks with PSM 1 vs. 2 or more might also provide important prognostic data in practice.

KW - Biochemical recurrence

KW - Digital microscopy

KW - Digital pathology

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Radical prostatectomy

KW - Surgical margin status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042063997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042063997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00428-018-2296-2

DO - 10.1007/s00428-018-2296-2

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Virchows Archiv

JF - Virchows Archiv

SN - 0945-6317

ER -