Dipstick proteinuria: Can it guide hypertension management?

Rajiv Agarwal, Atinder Panesar, Rebecca R. Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent guidelines call for lower blood pressure targets in patients with proteinuria of 1 g/d or greater. Dipstick test for proteinuria is widely available, but no information on its sensitivity or specificity is available when implementing current guidelines. To determine performance characteristics of dipstick proteinuria, we studied 332 patients attending a Veterans Administration renal clinic who underwent simultaneous measurement of urine protein and creatinine, as well as automated urinalysis with a dipstick graded from 0 to 4+ with a machine reader. There was increasing severity of proteinuria with each increment in dipstick result. When the spot urine protein-creatinine ratio was less than 1, a lower specific gravity was associated with greater severity of proteinuria. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 1 and 3 g protein/g creatinine were 0.945 and 0.905, respectively. This attests to the excellent performance of the urine dipstick. The likelihood of having a protein-creatinine ratio of 1 or greater was 7% when urine dipstick protein value was 1+ or 2+, 62% when dipstick protein value was 3+, and 92% when dipstick protein value was 4+. Thus, dipstick proteinuria assessed by an automated reader remains a useful test to predict the severity of proteinuria and can be used to guide therapy. A cutoff dipstick proteinuria value of 3+ has the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (96% and 87%, respectively) in predicting a protein-creatinine ratio of 1 or greater and a cutoff value of 4+ in predicting a protein-creatinine ratio of 3 or greater (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 83%). These results suggest that patients with 3+ or greater proteinuria should not only trigger appropriate evaluation of proteinuria, but also have mean arterial pressures targeted to less than 92 mm Hg.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1190-1195
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Proteinuria
Hypertension
Creatinine
Proteins
Urine
Guidelines
Sensitivity and Specificity
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Specific Gravity
Urinalysis
ROC Curve
Arterial Pressure
Blood Pressure
Kidney

Keywords

  • Hypertension
  • Proteinuria
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Urinalysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Dipstick proteinuria : Can it guide hypertension management? / Agarwal, Rajiv; Panesar, Atinder; Lewis, Rebecca R.

In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2002, p. 1190-1195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Agarwal, Rajiv ; Panesar, Atinder ; Lewis, Rebecca R. / Dipstick proteinuria : Can it guide hypertension management?. In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2002 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 1190-1195.
@article{997ead39440f4ef6aac32db735ce6f18,
title = "Dipstick proteinuria: Can it guide hypertension management?",
abstract = "Recent guidelines call for lower blood pressure targets in patients with proteinuria of 1 g/d or greater. Dipstick test for proteinuria is widely available, but no information on its sensitivity or specificity is available when implementing current guidelines. To determine performance characteristics of dipstick proteinuria, we studied 332 patients attending a Veterans Administration renal clinic who underwent simultaneous measurement of urine protein and creatinine, as well as automated urinalysis with a dipstick graded from 0 to 4+ with a machine reader. There was increasing severity of proteinuria with each increment in dipstick result. When the spot urine protein-creatinine ratio was less than 1, a lower specific gravity was associated with greater severity of proteinuria. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 1 and 3 g protein/g creatinine were 0.945 and 0.905, respectively. This attests to the excellent performance of the urine dipstick. The likelihood of having a protein-creatinine ratio of 1 or greater was 7{\%} when urine dipstick protein value was 1+ or 2+, 62{\%} when dipstick protein value was 3+, and 92{\%} when dipstick protein value was 4+. Thus, dipstick proteinuria assessed by an automated reader remains a useful test to predict the severity of proteinuria and can be used to guide therapy. A cutoff dipstick proteinuria value of 3+ has the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (96{\%} and 87{\%}, respectively) in predicting a protein-creatinine ratio of 1 or greater and a cutoff value of 4+ in predicting a protein-creatinine ratio of 3 or greater (sensitivity, 94{\%}; specificity, 83{\%}). These results suggest that patients with 3+ or greater proteinuria should not only trigger appropriate evaluation of proteinuria, but also have mean arterial pressures targeted to less than 92 mm Hg.",
keywords = "Hypertension, Proteinuria, Sensitivity, Specificity, Urinalysis",
author = "Rajiv Agarwal and Atinder Panesar and Lewis, {Rebecca R.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1053/ajkd.2002.33389",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1190--1195",
journal = "American Journal of Kidney Diseases",
issn = "0272-6386",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dipstick proteinuria

T2 - Can it guide hypertension management?

AU - Agarwal, Rajiv

AU - Panesar, Atinder

AU - Lewis, Rebecca R.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Recent guidelines call for lower blood pressure targets in patients with proteinuria of 1 g/d or greater. Dipstick test for proteinuria is widely available, but no information on its sensitivity or specificity is available when implementing current guidelines. To determine performance characteristics of dipstick proteinuria, we studied 332 patients attending a Veterans Administration renal clinic who underwent simultaneous measurement of urine protein and creatinine, as well as automated urinalysis with a dipstick graded from 0 to 4+ with a machine reader. There was increasing severity of proteinuria with each increment in dipstick result. When the spot urine protein-creatinine ratio was less than 1, a lower specific gravity was associated with greater severity of proteinuria. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 1 and 3 g protein/g creatinine were 0.945 and 0.905, respectively. This attests to the excellent performance of the urine dipstick. The likelihood of having a protein-creatinine ratio of 1 or greater was 7% when urine dipstick protein value was 1+ or 2+, 62% when dipstick protein value was 3+, and 92% when dipstick protein value was 4+. Thus, dipstick proteinuria assessed by an automated reader remains a useful test to predict the severity of proteinuria and can be used to guide therapy. A cutoff dipstick proteinuria value of 3+ has the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (96% and 87%, respectively) in predicting a protein-creatinine ratio of 1 or greater and a cutoff value of 4+ in predicting a protein-creatinine ratio of 3 or greater (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 83%). These results suggest that patients with 3+ or greater proteinuria should not only trigger appropriate evaluation of proteinuria, but also have mean arterial pressures targeted to less than 92 mm Hg.

AB - Recent guidelines call for lower blood pressure targets in patients with proteinuria of 1 g/d or greater. Dipstick test for proteinuria is widely available, but no information on its sensitivity or specificity is available when implementing current guidelines. To determine performance characteristics of dipstick proteinuria, we studied 332 patients attending a Veterans Administration renal clinic who underwent simultaneous measurement of urine protein and creatinine, as well as automated urinalysis with a dipstick graded from 0 to 4+ with a machine reader. There was increasing severity of proteinuria with each increment in dipstick result. When the spot urine protein-creatinine ratio was less than 1, a lower specific gravity was associated with greater severity of proteinuria. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 1 and 3 g protein/g creatinine were 0.945 and 0.905, respectively. This attests to the excellent performance of the urine dipstick. The likelihood of having a protein-creatinine ratio of 1 or greater was 7% when urine dipstick protein value was 1+ or 2+, 62% when dipstick protein value was 3+, and 92% when dipstick protein value was 4+. Thus, dipstick proteinuria assessed by an automated reader remains a useful test to predict the severity of proteinuria and can be used to guide therapy. A cutoff dipstick proteinuria value of 3+ has the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (96% and 87%, respectively) in predicting a protein-creatinine ratio of 1 or greater and a cutoff value of 4+ in predicting a protein-creatinine ratio of 3 or greater (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 83%). These results suggest that patients with 3+ or greater proteinuria should not only trigger appropriate evaluation of proteinuria, but also have mean arterial pressures targeted to less than 92 mm Hg.

KW - Hypertension

KW - Proteinuria

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

KW - Urinalysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036274595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036274595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/ajkd.2002.33389

DO - 10.1053/ajkd.2002.33389

M3 - Article

C2 - 12046030

AN - SCOPUS:0036274595

VL - 39

SP - 1190

EP - 1195

JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

SN - 0272-6386

IS - 6

ER -