Distribution of study designs in four major US journals of obstetrics and gynecology

Edmund F. Funai, Emily J. Rosenbush, Men Jean Lee, Giuseppe Del Priore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To classify and compare articles, based on the study design, in four leading US obstetrics and gynecology journals. Methods: One year of each journal, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG), Obstetrics and Gynecology (O&G), Gynecologic Oncology (GO), and Fertility and Sterility (F&S), beginning May 1997, was reviewed. Supplementary issues were excluded from review. The percentage of articles devoted to observational versus experimental study design was determined, and the quality of evidence was assessed including how heavily randomized controlled trials were represented versus other study designs. Results: 1,517 articles were reviewed. The average percentage of clinical research articles was 90.4. The percentage of animal studies were 10.7 (AJOG), 1.1 (O&G), 1.1 (GO) and 4.2 (F&S) (χ2p <0.001). There were 5.3, 1.9, 6.5, and 7.5% basic science articles, respectively (2 p = 0.007). The average percentage of observational articles was 68.2 and that of experimental articles was 14.1. The percentages of total articles classified as controlled experimental were 10.9 (AJOG), 14.6 (O&G), 5.1 (GO), and 15.2 (F&S) (χ2p = 0.01). There were 8.7, 11.1, 3.3 and 9.5% randomized controlled trials, respectively (χ2 p = 0.008). Conclusions: The majority of research reviewed was clinical, and more than half of the articles were observational. Under the US Preventative Services Task Force rating system, the randomized control trial is given the highest rating - class I evidence. The drive toward evidence-based clinical practice may not be fully supported by researchers in obstetrics and gynecology, as reflected by submissions to and publications in the major obstetrics and gynecology journals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-11
Number of pages4
JournalGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gynecology
Obstetrics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Evidence-Based Practice
Advisory Committees
Research
Infertility
Fertility
Publications
Research Design
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Randomized control trial
  • Study design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Distribution of study designs in four major US journals of obstetrics and gynecology. / Funai, Edmund F.; Rosenbush, Emily J.; Lee, Men Jean; Del Priore, Giuseppe.

In: Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2001, p. 8-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Funai, Edmund F. ; Rosenbush, Emily J. ; Lee, Men Jean ; Del Priore, Giuseppe. / Distribution of study designs in four major US journals of obstetrics and gynecology. In: Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2001 ; Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 8-11.
@article{33e6e60450384825a23c939b125c6555,
title = "Distribution of study designs in four major US journals of obstetrics and gynecology",
abstract = "Objective: To classify and compare articles, based on the study design, in four leading US obstetrics and gynecology journals. Methods: One year of each journal, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG), Obstetrics and Gynecology (O&G), Gynecologic Oncology (GO), and Fertility and Sterility (F&S), beginning May 1997, was reviewed. Supplementary issues were excluded from review. The percentage of articles devoted to observational versus experimental study design was determined, and the quality of evidence was assessed including how heavily randomized controlled trials were represented versus other study designs. Results: 1,517 articles were reviewed. The average percentage of clinical research articles was 90.4. The percentage of animal studies were 10.7 (AJOG), 1.1 (O&G), 1.1 (GO) and 4.2 (F&S) (χ2p <0.001). There were 5.3, 1.9, 6.5, and 7.5{\%} basic science articles, respectively (2 p = 0.007). The average percentage of observational articles was 68.2 and that of experimental articles was 14.1. The percentages of total articles classified as controlled experimental were 10.9 (AJOG), 14.6 (O&G), 5.1 (GO), and 15.2 (F&S) (χ2p = 0.01). There were 8.7, 11.1, 3.3 and 9.5{\%} randomized controlled trials, respectively (χ2 p = 0.008). Conclusions: The majority of research reviewed was clinical, and more than half of the articles were observational. Under the US Preventative Services Task Force rating system, the randomized control trial is given the highest rating - class I evidence. The drive toward evidence-based clinical practice may not be fully supported by researchers in obstetrics and gynecology, as reflected by submissions to and publications in the major obstetrics and gynecology journals.",
keywords = "Evidence-based medicine, Randomized control trial, Study design",
author = "Funai, {Edmund F.} and Rosenbush, {Emily J.} and Lee, {Men Jean} and {Del Priore}, Giuseppe",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1159/000052882",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "8--11",
journal = "Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation",
issn = "0378-7346",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distribution of study designs in four major US journals of obstetrics and gynecology

AU - Funai, Edmund F.

AU - Rosenbush, Emily J.

AU - Lee, Men Jean

AU - Del Priore, Giuseppe

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: To classify and compare articles, based on the study design, in four leading US obstetrics and gynecology journals. Methods: One year of each journal, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG), Obstetrics and Gynecology (O&G), Gynecologic Oncology (GO), and Fertility and Sterility (F&S), beginning May 1997, was reviewed. Supplementary issues were excluded from review. The percentage of articles devoted to observational versus experimental study design was determined, and the quality of evidence was assessed including how heavily randomized controlled trials were represented versus other study designs. Results: 1,517 articles were reviewed. The average percentage of clinical research articles was 90.4. The percentage of animal studies were 10.7 (AJOG), 1.1 (O&G), 1.1 (GO) and 4.2 (F&S) (χ2p <0.001). There were 5.3, 1.9, 6.5, and 7.5% basic science articles, respectively (2 p = 0.007). The average percentage of observational articles was 68.2 and that of experimental articles was 14.1. The percentages of total articles classified as controlled experimental were 10.9 (AJOG), 14.6 (O&G), 5.1 (GO), and 15.2 (F&S) (χ2p = 0.01). There were 8.7, 11.1, 3.3 and 9.5% randomized controlled trials, respectively (χ2 p = 0.008). Conclusions: The majority of research reviewed was clinical, and more than half of the articles were observational. Under the US Preventative Services Task Force rating system, the randomized control trial is given the highest rating - class I evidence. The drive toward evidence-based clinical practice may not be fully supported by researchers in obstetrics and gynecology, as reflected by submissions to and publications in the major obstetrics and gynecology journals.

AB - Objective: To classify and compare articles, based on the study design, in four leading US obstetrics and gynecology journals. Methods: One year of each journal, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG), Obstetrics and Gynecology (O&G), Gynecologic Oncology (GO), and Fertility and Sterility (F&S), beginning May 1997, was reviewed. Supplementary issues were excluded from review. The percentage of articles devoted to observational versus experimental study design was determined, and the quality of evidence was assessed including how heavily randomized controlled trials were represented versus other study designs. Results: 1,517 articles were reviewed. The average percentage of clinical research articles was 90.4. The percentage of animal studies were 10.7 (AJOG), 1.1 (O&G), 1.1 (GO) and 4.2 (F&S) (χ2p <0.001). There were 5.3, 1.9, 6.5, and 7.5% basic science articles, respectively (2 p = 0.007). The average percentage of observational articles was 68.2 and that of experimental articles was 14.1. The percentages of total articles classified as controlled experimental were 10.9 (AJOG), 14.6 (O&G), 5.1 (GO), and 15.2 (F&S) (χ2p = 0.01). There were 8.7, 11.1, 3.3 and 9.5% randomized controlled trials, respectively (χ2 p = 0.008). Conclusions: The majority of research reviewed was clinical, and more than half of the articles were observational. Under the US Preventative Services Task Force rating system, the randomized control trial is given the highest rating - class I evidence. The drive toward evidence-based clinical practice may not be fully supported by researchers in obstetrics and gynecology, as reflected by submissions to and publications in the major obstetrics and gynecology journals.

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Randomized control trial

KW - Study design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035160640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035160640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000052882

DO - 10.1159/000052882

M3 - Article

C2 - 11150867

AN - SCOPUS:0035160640

VL - 51

SP - 8

EP - 11

JO - Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

JF - Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

SN - 0378-7346

IS - 1

ER -