Do EMS personnel identify, report, and disclose medical errors?

Cherri Hobgood, Josie Barnes Bowen, Jane H. Brice, Barbara Overby, Joshua H. Tamayo-Sarver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate self-reports of prehospital providers' error frequency, disclosure, and reporting in their actual practice and in hypothetical scenarios. Methods. The authors surveyed a convenience sample of prehospital providers attending a statewide emergency medical services conference using a two-part instrument. Part 1 evaluated respondent demographics and actual practice patterns. Part 2 used hypothetic scenarios to assess error identification, disclosure, and reporting patterns. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used to characterize demographics and practice patterns. For hypothetical scenarios, the authors calculated mean responses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess error identification, anticipated disclosure, and reporting patterns. Results. The response rate was 88% (372/425). Analysis was limited to 283 (75% of 372) respondents who were emergency medical technicians and had complete data. In the previous year, 157 (55%) providers identified no errors in practice, 100 (35%) reported one or two errors, and 26 (9%) identified more than two errors. In approximately half of cases, identified errors were reported to the receiving provider, or supervisor. In hypothetical cases, severe errors were identified 93% (95% CI 92-94) of the time, but the ability of providers to identify mild errors significantly varied. In all scenarios, respondents were much more likely to report errors to the receiving hospital, their supervisor, and their medical director than to patients. Conclusions. Prehospital providers demonstrate the capacity to identify, report, and, to a lesser extent, disclose errors in hypothetical scenarios but may not apply these skills uniformly in their own practices. Enhancing error management skills in prehospital clinical practice will require focused education and training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-27
Number of pages7
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Truth Disclosure
Medical Errors
Emergency Medical Technicians
Demography
Confidence Intervals
Physician Executives
Aptitude
Disclosure
Emergency Medical Services
Self Report
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Disclosure
  • Errors
  • Prehospital providers
  • Reporting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Do EMS personnel identify, report, and disclose medical errors? / Hobgood, Cherri; Bowen, Josie Barnes; Brice, Jane H.; Overby, Barbara; Tamayo-Sarver, Joshua H.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 21-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hobgood, Cherri ; Bowen, Josie Barnes ; Brice, Jane H. ; Overby, Barbara ; Tamayo-Sarver, Joshua H. / Do EMS personnel identify, report, and disclose medical errors?. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2006 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 21-27.
@article{3c85b3b76bed4e4aa2dd277b740e9f3e,
title = "Do EMS personnel identify, report, and disclose medical errors?",
abstract = "Objective. To evaluate self-reports of prehospital providers' error frequency, disclosure, and reporting in their actual practice and in hypothetical scenarios. Methods. The authors surveyed a convenience sample of prehospital providers attending a statewide emergency medical services conference using a two-part instrument. Part 1 evaluated respondent demographics and actual practice patterns. Part 2 used hypothetic scenarios to assess error identification, disclosure, and reporting patterns. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used to characterize demographics and practice patterns. For hypothetical scenarios, the authors calculated mean responses with 95{\%} confidence intervals (CIs) to assess error identification, anticipated disclosure, and reporting patterns. Results. The response rate was 88{\%} (372/425). Analysis was limited to 283 (75{\%} of 372) respondents who were emergency medical technicians and had complete data. In the previous year, 157 (55{\%}) providers identified no errors in practice, 100 (35{\%}) reported one or two errors, and 26 (9{\%}) identified more than two errors. In approximately half of cases, identified errors were reported to the receiving provider, or supervisor. In hypothetical cases, severe errors were identified 93{\%} (95{\%} CI 92-94) of the time, but the ability of providers to identify mild errors significantly varied. In all scenarios, respondents were much more likely to report errors to the receiving hospital, their supervisor, and their medical director than to patients. Conclusions. Prehospital providers demonstrate the capacity to identify, report, and, to a lesser extent, disclose errors in hypothetical scenarios but may not apply these skills uniformly in their own practices. Enhancing error management skills in prehospital clinical practice will require focused education and training.",
keywords = "Disclosure, Errors, Prehospital providers, Reporting",
author = "Cherri Hobgood and Bowen, {Josie Barnes} and Brice, {Jane H.} and Barbara Overby and Tamayo-Sarver, {Joshua H.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10903120500366011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "21--27",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do EMS personnel identify, report, and disclose medical errors?

AU - Hobgood, Cherri

AU - Bowen, Josie Barnes

AU - Brice, Jane H.

AU - Overby, Barbara

AU - Tamayo-Sarver, Joshua H.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Objective. To evaluate self-reports of prehospital providers' error frequency, disclosure, and reporting in their actual practice and in hypothetical scenarios. Methods. The authors surveyed a convenience sample of prehospital providers attending a statewide emergency medical services conference using a two-part instrument. Part 1 evaluated respondent demographics and actual practice patterns. Part 2 used hypothetic scenarios to assess error identification, disclosure, and reporting patterns. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used to characterize demographics and practice patterns. For hypothetical scenarios, the authors calculated mean responses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess error identification, anticipated disclosure, and reporting patterns. Results. The response rate was 88% (372/425). Analysis was limited to 283 (75% of 372) respondents who were emergency medical technicians and had complete data. In the previous year, 157 (55%) providers identified no errors in practice, 100 (35%) reported one or two errors, and 26 (9%) identified more than two errors. In approximately half of cases, identified errors were reported to the receiving provider, or supervisor. In hypothetical cases, severe errors were identified 93% (95% CI 92-94) of the time, but the ability of providers to identify mild errors significantly varied. In all scenarios, respondents were much more likely to report errors to the receiving hospital, their supervisor, and their medical director than to patients. Conclusions. Prehospital providers demonstrate the capacity to identify, report, and, to a lesser extent, disclose errors in hypothetical scenarios but may not apply these skills uniformly in their own practices. Enhancing error management skills in prehospital clinical practice will require focused education and training.

AB - Objective. To evaluate self-reports of prehospital providers' error frequency, disclosure, and reporting in their actual practice and in hypothetical scenarios. Methods. The authors surveyed a convenience sample of prehospital providers attending a statewide emergency medical services conference using a two-part instrument. Part 1 evaluated respondent demographics and actual practice patterns. Part 2 used hypothetic scenarios to assess error identification, disclosure, and reporting patterns. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used to characterize demographics and practice patterns. For hypothetical scenarios, the authors calculated mean responses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess error identification, anticipated disclosure, and reporting patterns. Results. The response rate was 88% (372/425). Analysis was limited to 283 (75% of 372) respondents who were emergency medical technicians and had complete data. In the previous year, 157 (55%) providers identified no errors in practice, 100 (35%) reported one or two errors, and 26 (9%) identified more than two errors. In approximately half of cases, identified errors were reported to the receiving provider, or supervisor. In hypothetical cases, severe errors were identified 93% (95% CI 92-94) of the time, but the ability of providers to identify mild errors significantly varied. In all scenarios, respondents were much more likely to report errors to the receiving hospital, their supervisor, and their medical director than to patients. Conclusions. Prehospital providers demonstrate the capacity to identify, report, and, to a lesser extent, disclose errors in hypothetical scenarios but may not apply these skills uniformly in their own practices. Enhancing error management skills in prehospital clinical practice will require focused education and training.

KW - Disclosure

KW - Errors

KW - Prehospital providers

KW - Reporting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31544449432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31544449432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903120500366011

DO - 10.1080/10903120500366011

M3 - Article

C2 - 16418087

AN - SCOPUS:31544449432

VL - 10

SP - 21

EP - 27

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 1

ER -