Do hospitals that do the right thing have more satisfied patients?

Gabriel S. Tajeu, Abby Swanson Kazley, Nir Menachemi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Hospital incentive payments are increasingly becoming tied to quality. However, the U.S. health care system continues to face rising health care costs and scarce workforce resources, making improving quality a challenge. Patient satisfaction and process quality are two areas of quality tied to reimbursement. Both are associated with positive health outcomes, but little is known about the relationship between the two. Purposes: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an association between process quality and patient satisfaction in a representative sample of U.S. hospitals. Methodology/Approach: We utilize a pooled cross-sectional study design with year fixed effects from 2009 to 2011. We linked the Hospital Compare data set and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals (AHA) data set. We use a method prescribed by the Joint Commission to determine hospital-level process quality in three areas: heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia treatment. We then use regression models to measure the relationship between process quality and two measures of overall hospital patient satisfaction. Findings: After we control for hospital-level characteristics and year, we find that patient satisfaction is positively associated with all three areas of hospital process quality (p <.01). For example, acute myocardial infarction process quality was positively associated with whether patients "would definitely recommend the hospital" (B = 0.75, p <.01). Process quality areas were moderately and positively correlated (p <.01), and on average, patient satisfaction scores have increased over time (p <.01). Practice Implications: Our findings of an association between process quality and patient satisfaction suggest that focusing on process quality does not have negative implications for patient satisfaction. As performance in different process quality areas is only moderately correlated, managers should continually monitor all areas. The trend of increased patient satisfaction over time, perhaps because of industry pressures, should be investigated further.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)348-355
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Myocardial Infarction
American Hospital Association
Process quality
Patient satisfaction
Health Care Costs
Motivation
Pneumonia
Industry
Heart Failure
Cross-Sectional Studies
Joints
Delivery of Health Care
Pressure
Health

Keywords

  • effectiveness
  • hospital
  • Key words:
  • management
  • patient satisfaction
  • process quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Leadership and Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Do hospitals that do the right thing have more satisfied patients? / Tajeu, Gabriel S.; Kazley, Abby Swanson; Menachemi, Nir.

In: Health Care Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 348-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tajeu, Gabriel S. ; Kazley, Abby Swanson ; Menachemi, Nir. / Do hospitals that do the right thing have more satisfied patients?. In: Health Care Management Review. 2015 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 348-355.
@article{a465ee0223724850927535a599ac47eb,
title = "Do hospitals that do the right thing have more satisfied patients?",
abstract = "Background: Hospital incentive payments are increasingly becoming tied to quality. However, the U.S. health care system continues to face rising health care costs and scarce workforce resources, making improving quality a challenge. Patient satisfaction and process quality are two areas of quality tied to reimbursement. Both are associated with positive health outcomes, but little is known about the relationship between the two. Purposes: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an association between process quality and patient satisfaction in a representative sample of U.S. hospitals. Methodology/Approach: We utilize a pooled cross-sectional study design with year fixed effects from 2009 to 2011. We linked the Hospital Compare data set and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals (AHA) data set. We use a method prescribed by the Joint Commission to determine hospital-level process quality in three areas: heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia treatment. We then use regression models to measure the relationship between process quality and two measures of overall hospital patient satisfaction. Findings: After we control for hospital-level characteristics and year, we find that patient satisfaction is positively associated with all three areas of hospital process quality (p <.01). For example, acute myocardial infarction process quality was positively associated with whether patients {"}would definitely recommend the hospital{"} (B = 0.75, p <.01). Process quality areas were moderately and positively correlated (p <.01), and on average, patient satisfaction scores have increased over time (p <.01). Practice Implications: Our findings of an association between process quality and patient satisfaction suggest that focusing on process quality does not have negative implications for patient satisfaction. As performance in different process quality areas is only moderately correlated, managers should continually monitor all areas. The trend of increased patient satisfaction over time, perhaps because of industry pressures, should be investigated further.",
keywords = "effectiveness, hospital, Key words:, management, patient satisfaction, process quality",
author = "Tajeu, {Gabriel S.} and Kazley, {Abby Swanson} and Nir Menachemi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/HMR.0000000000000034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "348--355",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do hospitals that do the right thing have more satisfied patients?

AU - Tajeu, Gabriel S.

AU - Kazley, Abby Swanson

AU - Menachemi, Nir

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Hospital incentive payments are increasingly becoming tied to quality. However, the U.S. health care system continues to face rising health care costs and scarce workforce resources, making improving quality a challenge. Patient satisfaction and process quality are two areas of quality tied to reimbursement. Both are associated with positive health outcomes, but little is known about the relationship between the two. Purposes: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an association between process quality and patient satisfaction in a representative sample of U.S. hospitals. Methodology/Approach: We utilize a pooled cross-sectional study design with year fixed effects from 2009 to 2011. We linked the Hospital Compare data set and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals (AHA) data set. We use a method prescribed by the Joint Commission to determine hospital-level process quality in three areas: heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia treatment. We then use regression models to measure the relationship between process quality and two measures of overall hospital patient satisfaction. Findings: After we control for hospital-level characteristics and year, we find that patient satisfaction is positively associated with all three areas of hospital process quality (p <.01). For example, acute myocardial infarction process quality was positively associated with whether patients "would definitely recommend the hospital" (B = 0.75, p <.01). Process quality areas were moderately and positively correlated (p <.01), and on average, patient satisfaction scores have increased over time (p <.01). Practice Implications: Our findings of an association between process quality and patient satisfaction suggest that focusing on process quality does not have negative implications for patient satisfaction. As performance in different process quality areas is only moderately correlated, managers should continually monitor all areas. The trend of increased patient satisfaction over time, perhaps because of industry pressures, should be investigated further.

AB - Background: Hospital incentive payments are increasingly becoming tied to quality. However, the U.S. health care system continues to face rising health care costs and scarce workforce resources, making improving quality a challenge. Patient satisfaction and process quality are two areas of quality tied to reimbursement. Both are associated with positive health outcomes, but little is known about the relationship between the two. Purposes: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an association between process quality and patient satisfaction in a representative sample of U.S. hospitals. Methodology/Approach: We utilize a pooled cross-sectional study design with year fixed effects from 2009 to 2011. We linked the Hospital Compare data set and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals (AHA) data set. We use a method prescribed by the Joint Commission to determine hospital-level process quality in three areas: heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia treatment. We then use regression models to measure the relationship between process quality and two measures of overall hospital patient satisfaction. Findings: After we control for hospital-level characteristics and year, we find that patient satisfaction is positively associated with all three areas of hospital process quality (p <.01). For example, acute myocardial infarction process quality was positively associated with whether patients "would definitely recommend the hospital" (B = 0.75, p <.01). Process quality areas were moderately and positively correlated (p <.01), and on average, patient satisfaction scores have increased over time (p <.01). Practice Implications: Our findings of an association between process quality and patient satisfaction suggest that focusing on process quality does not have negative implications for patient satisfaction. As performance in different process quality areas is only moderately correlated, managers should continually monitor all areas. The trend of increased patient satisfaction over time, perhaps because of industry pressures, should be investigated further.

KW - effectiveness

KW - hospital

KW - Key words:

KW - management

KW - patient satisfaction

KW - process quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942095505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942095505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000034

DO - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000034

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 348

EP - 355

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 4

ER -