Do Medical Students’ Narrative Representations of “The Good Doctor” Change Over Time? Comparing Humanism Essays From a National Contest in 1999 and 2013

Pooja C. Rutberg, Brandy King, Elizabeth Gaufberg, Pamela Brett-MacLean, Perry Dinardo, Richard Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore medical students’ conceptions of “the good doctor” at two points in time separated by 14 years. METHOD: The authors conducted qualitative analysis of narrative-based essays. Following a constant comparative method, an emergent relational coding scheme was developed which the authors used to characterize 110 essays submitted to the Arnold P. Gold Foundation Humanism in Medicine Essay Contest in 1999 (n = 50) and 2013 (n = 60) in response to the prompt, “Who is the good doctor?” RESULTS: The authors identified five relational themes as guiding the day-to-day work and lives of physicians: doctor–patient, doctor–self, doctor–learner, doctor–colleague, and doctor–system/society/profession. The authors noted a highly similar distribution of primary and secondary relational themes for essays from 1999 and 2013. The majority of the essays emphasized the centrality of the doctor–patient relationship. Student essays focused little on teamwork, systems innovation, or technology use—all important developments in contemporary medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students’ narrative reflections are increasingly used as rich sources of information about the lived experience of medical education. The findings reported here suggest that medical students understand the “good doctor” as a relational being, with an enduring emphasis on the doctor–patient relationship. Medical education would benefit from including an emphasis on the relational aspects of medicine. Future research should focus on relational learning as a pedagogical approach that may support the formation of caring, effective physicians embedded in a complex array of relationships within clinical, community, and larger societal contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 20 2016

Fingerprint

Humanism
humanism
Medical Students
medical student
Medicine
Medical Education
narrative
Physicians
medicine
Gold
physician
Learning
Students
Technology
teamwork
gold
source of information
time
coding
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Do Medical Students’ Narrative Representations of “The Good Doctor” Change Over Time? Comparing Humanism Essays From a National Contest in 1999 and 2013. / Rutberg, Pooja C.; King, Brandy; Gaufberg, Elizabeth; Brett-MacLean, Pamela; Dinardo, Perry; Frankel, Richard.

In: Academic Medicine, 20.12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55ec2677b807402baacce5e27ddc24e3,
title = "Do Medical Students’ Narrative Representations of “The Good Doctor” Change Over Time? Comparing Humanism Essays From a National Contest in 1999 and 2013",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To explore medical students’ conceptions of “the good doctor” at two points in time separated by 14 years. METHOD: The authors conducted qualitative analysis of narrative-based essays. Following a constant comparative method, an emergent relational coding scheme was developed which the authors used to characterize 110 essays submitted to the Arnold P. Gold Foundation Humanism in Medicine Essay Contest in 1999 (n = 50) and 2013 (n = 60) in response to the prompt, “Who is the good doctor?” RESULTS: The authors identified five relational themes as guiding the day-to-day work and lives of physicians: doctor–patient, doctor–self, doctor–learner, doctor–colleague, and doctor–system/society/profession. The authors noted a highly similar distribution of primary and secondary relational themes for essays from 1999 and 2013. The majority of the essays emphasized the centrality of the doctor–patient relationship. Student essays focused little on teamwork, systems innovation, or technology use—all important developments in contemporary medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students’ narrative reflections are increasingly used as rich sources of information about the lived experience of medical education. The findings reported here suggest that medical students understand the “good doctor” as a relational being, with an enduring emphasis on the doctor–patient relationship. Medical education would benefit from including an emphasis on the relational aspects of medicine. Future research should focus on relational learning as a pedagogical approach that may support the formation of caring, effective physicians embedded in a complex array of relationships within clinical, community, and larger societal contexts.",
author = "Rutberg, {Pooja C.} and Brandy King and Elizabeth Gaufberg and Pamela Brett-MacLean and Perry Dinardo and Richard Frankel",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000001531",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Medical Students’ Narrative Representations of “The Good Doctor” Change Over Time? Comparing Humanism Essays From a National Contest in 1999 and 2013

AU - Rutberg, Pooja C.

AU - King, Brandy

AU - Gaufberg, Elizabeth

AU - Brett-MacLean, Pamela

AU - Dinardo, Perry

AU - Frankel, Richard

PY - 2016/12/20

Y1 - 2016/12/20

N2 - PURPOSE: To explore medical students’ conceptions of “the good doctor” at two points in time separated by 14 years. METHOD: The authors conducted qualitative analysis of narrative-based essays. Following a constant comparative method, an emergent relational coding scheme was developed which the authors used to characterize 110 essays submitted to the Arnold P. Gold Foundation Humanism in Medicine Essay Contest in 1999 (n = 50) and 2013 (n = 60) in response to the prompt, “Who is the good doctor?” RESULTS: The authors identified five relational themes as guiding the day-to-day work and lives of physicians: doctor–patient, doctor–self, doctor–learner, doctor–colleague, and doctor–system/society/profession. The authors noted a highly similar distribution of primary and secondary relational themes for essays from 1999 and 2013. The majority of the essays emphasized the centrality of the doctor–patient relationship. Student essays focused little on teamwork, systems innovation, or technology use—all important developments in contemporary medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students’ narrative reflections are increasingly used as rich sources of information about the lived experience of medical education. The findings reported here suggest that medical students understand the “good doctor” as a relational being, with an enduring emphasis on the doctor–patient relationship. Medical education would benefit from including an emphasis on the relational aspects of medicine. Future research should focus on relational learning as a pedagogical approach that may support the formation of caring, effective physicians embedded in a complex array of relationships within clinical, community, and larger societal contexts.

AB - PURPOSE: To explore medical students’ conceptions of “the good doctor” at two points in time separated by 14 years. METHOD: The authors conducted qualitative analysis of narrative-based essays. Following a constant comparative method, an emergent relational coding scheme was developed which the authors used to characterize 110 essays submitted to the Arnold P. Gold Foundation Humanism in Medicine Essay Contest in 1999 (n = 50) and 2013 (n = 60) in response to the prompt, “Who is the good doctor?” RESULTS: The authors identified five relational themes as guiding the day-to-day work and lives of physicians: doctor–patient, doctor–self, doctor–learner, doctor–colleague, and doctor–system/society/profession. The authors noted a highly similar distribution of primary and secondary relational themes for essays from 1999 and 2013. The majority of the essays emphasized the centrality of the doctor–patient relationship. Student essays focused little on teamwork, systems innovation, or technology use—all important developments in contemporary medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students’ narrative reflections are increasingly used as rich sources of information about the lived experience of medical education. The findings reported here suggest that medical students understand the “good doctor” as a relational being, with an enduring emphasis on the doctor–patient relationship. Medical education would benefit from including an emphasis on the relational aspects of medicine. Future research should focus on relational learning as a pedagogical approach that may support the formation of caring, effective physicians embedded in a complex array of relationships within clinical, community, and larger societal contexts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007154523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007154523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001531

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001531

M3 - Article

C2 - 28351067

AN - SCOPUS:85007154523

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

ER -