“Do You Know What I Know?”: How Communication Norms and Recipient Design Shape the Content and Effectiveness of Patient Handoffs

Nicholas A. Rattray, Mindy E. Flanagan, Laura G. Militello, Paul Barach, Zamal Franks, Patricia Ebright, Shakaib U. Rehman, Howard S. Gordon, Richard Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Poor communication during end-of-shift transfers of care (handoffs) is associated with safety risks and patient harm. Despite the common perception that handoffs are largely a one-way transfer of information, researchers have documented that they are complex interactions, guided by implicit social norms and mental frameworks. Objectives: We investigated communication strategies that resident physicians report deploying to tailor information during face-to-face handoffs that are often based on their implicit inferences about the perceived information needs and potential harm to patients. Methods/Participants: We interviewed 35 residents in Medicine and Surgery wards at three VA Medical Centers (VAMCs). Main Measures: We conducted qualitative interviews using audio-recorded semi-structured cognitive task interviews. Key Results: The effectiveness of handoff communication depends upon three factors: receiver characteristics, type of shift, and patient’s condition and perceived acuity. Receiver characteristics, including subjective perceptions about an incoming resident’s training or ability levels and their assumed preferences for information (e.g., detailed/comprehensive vs. minimal/“big picture”), influenced content shared during handoffs. Residents handing off to the night team provided more information about patients’ medical histories and care plans than residents handing off to the day team, and higher patient acuity merited more detailed information and the medical service(s) involved dictated the types of information conveyed. Conclusions: We found that handoff communication involves a complex combination of socio-technical information where residents balance relational factors against content and risk. It is not a mechanistic process of merely transferring clinical data but rather is based on learned habits of communication that are context-sensitive and variable, what we refer to as “recipient design.” Interventions should focus on raising awareness of times when information is omitted, customized, or expanded based on implicit judgments, the emerging threats such judgments pose to patient care and quality, and the competencies needed to be more explicit in handoff interactions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Communication
Patient Harm
Patient Acuity
Interviews
Aptitude
Information Services
Habits
Patient Care
Research Personnel
Medicine
Physicians
Safety

Keywords

  • communication
  • patient safety
  • qualitative research
  • quality of care
  • resident handoffs
  • risk management
  • sociolinguistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

“Do You Know What I Know?” : How Communication Norms and Recipient Design Shape the Content and Effectiveness of Patient Handoffs. / Rattray, Nicholas A.; Flanagan, Mindy E.; Militello, Laura G.; Barach, Paul; Franks, Zamal; Ebright, Patricia; Rehman, Shakaib U.; Gordon, Howard S.; Frankel, Richard.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rattray, Nicholas A. ; Flanagan, Mindy E. ; Militello, Laura G. ; Barach, Paul ; Franks, Zamal ; Ebright, Patricia ; Rehman, Shakaib U. ; Gordon, Howard S. ; Frankel, Richard. / “Do You Know What I Know?” : How Communication Norms and Recipient Design Shape the Content and Effectiveness of Patient Handoffs. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2018.
@article{61bf79927dab43f3be4a88b5c3c374c7,
title = "“Do You Know What I Know?”: How Communication Norms and Recipient Design Shape the Content and Effectiveness of Patient Handoffs",
abstract = "Background: Poor communication during end-of-shift transfers of care (handoffs) is associated with safety risks and patient harm. Despite the common perception that handoffs are largely a one-way transfer of information, researchers have documented that they are complex interactions, guided by implicit social norms and mental frameworks. Objectives: We investigated communication strategies that resident physicians report deploying to tailor information during face-to-face handoffs that are often based on their implicit inferences about the perceived information needs and potential harm to patients. Methods/Participants: We interviewed 35 residents in Medicine and Surgery wards at three VA Medical Centers (VAMCs). Main Measures: We conducted qualitative interviews using audio-recorded semi-structured cognitive task interviews. Key Results: The effectiveness of handoff communication depends upon three factors: receiver characteristics, type of shift, and patient’s condition and perceived acuity. Receiver characteristics, including subjective perceptions about an incoming resident’s training or ability levels and their assumed preferences for information (e.g., detailed/comprehensive vs. minimal/“big picture”), influenced content shared during handoffs. Residents handing off to the night team provided more information about patients’ medical histories and care plans than residents handing off to the day team, and higher patient acuity merited more detailed information and the medical service(s) involved dictated the types of information conveyed. Conclusions: We found that handoff communication involves a complex combination of socio-technical information where residents balance relational factors against content and risk. It is not a mechanistic process of merely transferring clinical data but rather is based on learned habits of communication that are context-sensitive and variable, what we refer to as “recipient design.” Interventions should focus on raising awareness of times when information is omitted, customized, or expanded based on implicit judgments, the emerging threats such judgments pose to patient care and quality, and the competencies needed to be more explicit in handoff interactions.",
keywords = "communication, patient safety, qualitative research, quality of care, resident handoffs, risk management, sociolinguistics",
author = "Rattray, {Nicholas A.} and Flanagan, {Mindy E.} and Militello, {Laura G.} and Paul Barach and Zamal Franks and Patricia Ebright and Rehman, {Shakaib U.} and Gordon, {Howard S.} and Richard Frankel",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-018-4755-5",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Do You Know What I Know?”

T2 - How Communication Norms and Recipient Design Shape the Content and Effectiveness of Patient Handoffs

AU - Rattray, Nicholas A.

AU - Flanagan, Mindy E.

AU - Militello, Laura G.

AU - Barach, Paul

AU - Franks, Zamal

AU - Ebright, Patricia

AU - Rehman, Shakaib U.

AU - Gordon, Howard S.

AU - Frankel, Richard

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Poor communication during end-of-shift transfers of care (handoffs) is associated with safety risks and patient harm. Despite the common perception that handoffs are largely a one-way transfer of information, researchers have documented that they are complex interactions, guided by implicit social norms and mental frameworks. Objectives: We investigated communication strategies that resident physicians report deploying to tailor information during face-to-face handoffs that are often based on their implicit inferences about the perceived information needs and potential harm to patients. Methods/Participants: We interviewed 35 residents in Medicine and Surgery wards at three VA Medical Centers (VAMCs). Main Measures: We conducted qualitative interviews using audio-recorded semi-structured cognitive task interviews. Key Results: The effectiveness of handoff communication depends upon three factors: receiver characteristics, type of shift, and patient’s condition and perceived acuity. Receiver characteristics, including subjective perceptions about an incoming resident’s training or ability levels and their assumed preferences for information (e.g., detailed/comprehensive vs. minimal/“big picture”), influenced content shared during handoffs. Residents handing off to the night team provided more information about patients’ medical histories and care plans than residents handing off to the day team, and higher patient acuity merited more detailed information and the medical service(s) involved dictated the types of information conveyed. Conclusions: We found that handoff communication involves a complex combination of socio-technical information where residents balance relational factors against content and risk. It is not a mechanistic process of merely transferring clinical data but rather is based on learned habits of communication that are context-sensitive and variable, what we refer to as “recipient design.” Interventions should focus on raising awareness of times when information is omitted, customized, or expanded based on implicit judgments, the emerging threats such judgments pose to patient care and quality, and the competencies needed to be more explicit in handoff interactions.

AB - Background: Poor communication during end-of-shift transfers of care (handoffs) is associated with safety risks and patient harm. Despite the common perception that handoffs are largely a one-way transfer of information, researchers have documented that they are complex interactions, guided by implicit social norms and mental frameworks. Objectives: We investigated communication strategies that resident physicians report deploying to tailor information during face-to-face handoffs that are often based on their implicit inferences about the perceived information needs and potential harm to patients. Methods/Participants: We interviewed 35 residents in Medicine and Surgery wards at three VA Medical Centers (VAMCs). Main Measures: We conducted qualitative interviews using audio-recorded semi-structured cognitive task interviews. Key Results: The effectiveness of handoff communication depends upon three factors: receiver characteristics, type of shift, and patient’s condition and perceived acuity. Receiver characteristics, including subjective perceptions about an incoming resident’s training or ability levels and their assumed preferences for information (e.g., detailed/comprehensive vs. minimal/“big picture”), influenced content shared during handoffs. Residents handing off to the night team provided more information about patients’ medical histories and care plans than residents handing off to the day team, and higher patient acuity merited more detailed information and the medical service(s) involved dictated the types of information conveyed. Conclusions: We found that handoff communication involves a complex combination of socio-technical information where residents balance relational factors against content and risk. It is not a mechanistic process of merely transferring clinical data but rather is based on learned habits of communication that are context-sensitive and variable, what we refer to as “recipient design.” Interventions should focus on raising awareness of times when information is omitted, customized, or expanded based on implicit judgments, the emerging threats such judgments pose to patient care and quality, and the competencies needed to be more explicit in handoff interactions.

KW - communication

KW - patient safety

KW - qualitative research

KW - quality of care

KW - resident handoffs

KW - risk management

KW - sociolinguistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058217059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058217059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-018-4755-5

DO - 10.1007/s11606-018-4755-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 30535752

AN - SCOPUS:85058217059

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

ER -