Does electronic health record use improve hospital financial performance? Evidence from panel data

Taleah H. Collum, Nir Menachemi, Bisakha Sen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of electronic health record (EHR) adoption on hospital financial performance. Methodology/Approach: We constructed a longitudinal panel using data from the three secondary sources: (a) the 2007-2010 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, (b) the 2007-2010 AHA Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement, and (c) the 2007-2011 Medicare Cost Reports from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Because potential financial benefits attributable to EHR adoption may take some time to accrue, we ran regressions with lags of 1 and 2 years that included hospital and year fixed effects to examine the relationship between the level of EHR adoption and three hospital financial performance measures. Findings: A change in the level of EHR adoption was not associated with changes in operating margin or return on assets within hospitals. However, total margin was significantly improved, after 2 years, in hospitals that moved from no EHR to having a comprehensive EHR in all areas of their hospital (β = 0.030, p <.034). On the other hand, hospitals that increased their level of EHR adoption but did not achieve hospital-wide comprehensive adoption did not experience changes in any financial performance measures examined. Practice Implications: The improvements in total margin, as opposed to operating margin, are likely due to hospital incentive payments under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act that are reflected in nonpatient revenues and therefore show up in total margin calculations. Thus, after 2 years of EHR adoption, hospital financial performance is observed to improve based only on meaningful use incentive payments. More research will be needed to determine whether EHR adoption impacts financial performance on a longer time horizon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-274
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
American Hospital Association
Health Status
Motivation
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Electronic health record
Financial performance
Panel data
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Medicare
Technology
Costs and Cost Analysis
Margin

Keywords

  • EHR
  • financial performance
  • meaningful use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Does electronic health record use improve hospital financial performance? Evidence from panel data. / Collum, Taleah H.; Menachemi, Nir; Sen, Bisakha.

In: Health Care Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, 01.07.2016, p. 267-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e88dbc2ec3c344b29c468bfb4058b244,
title = "Does electronic health record use improve hospital financial performance? Evidence from panel data",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of electronic health record (EHR) adoption on hospital financial performance. Methodology/Approach: We constructed a longitudinal panel using data from the three secondary sources: (a) the 2007-2010 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, (b) the 2007-2010 AHA Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement, and (c) the 2007-2011 Medicare Cost Reports from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Because potential financial benefits attributable to EHR adoption may take some time to accrue, we ran regressions with lags of 1 and 2 years that included hospital and year fixed effects to examine the relationship between the level of EHR adoption and three hospital financial performance measures. Findings: A change in the level of EHR adoption was not associated with changes in operating margin or return on assets within hospitals. However, total margin was significantly improved, after 2 years, in hospitals that moved from no EHR to having a comprehensive EHR in all areas of their hospital (β = 0.030, p <.034). On the other hand, hospitals that increased their level of EHR adoption but did not achieve hospital-wide comprehensive adoption did not experience changes in any financial performance measures examined. Practice Implications: The improvements in total margin, as opposed to operating margin, are likely due to hospital incentive payments under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act that are reflected in nonpatient revenues and therefore show up in total margin calculations. Thus, after 2 years of EHR adoption, hospital financial performance is observed to improve based only on meaningful use incentive payments. More research will be needed to determine whether EHR adoption impacts financial performance on a longer time horizon.",
keywords = "EHR, financial performance, meaningful use",
author = "Collum, {Taleah H.} and Nir Menachemi and Bisakha Sen",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/HMR.0000000000000068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "267--274",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does electronic health record use improve hospital financial performance? Evidence from panel data

AU - Collum, Taleah H.

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Sen, Bisakha

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of electronic health record (EHR) adoption on hospital financial performance. Methodology/Approach: We constructed a longitudinal panel using data from the three secondary sources: (a) the 2007-2010 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, (b) the 2007-2010 AHA Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement, and (c) the 2007-2011 Medicare Cost Reports from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Because potential financial benefits attributable to EHR adoption may take some time to accrue, we ran regressions with lags of 1 and 2 years that included hospital and year fixed effects to examine the relationship between the level of EHR adoption and three hospital financial performance measures. Findings: A change in the level of EHR adoption was not associated with changes in operating margin or return on assets within hospitals. However, total margin was significantly improved, after 2 years, in hospitals that moved from no EHR to having a comprehensive EHR in all areas of their hospital (β = 0.030, p <.034). On the other hand, hospitals that increased their level of EHR adoption but did not achieve hospital-wide comprehensive adoption did not experience changes in any financial performance measures examined. Practice Implications: The improvements in total margin, as opposed to operating margin, are likely due to hospital incentive payments under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act that are reflected in nonpatient revenues and therefore show up in total margin calculations. Thus, after 2 years of EHR adoption, hospital financial performance is observed to improve based only on meaningful use incentive payments. More research will be needed to determine whether EHR adoption impacts financial performance on a longer time horizon.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of electronic health record (EHR) adoption on hospital financial performance. Methodology/Approach: We constructed a longitudinal panel using data from the three secondary sources: (a) the 2007-2010 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, (b) the 2007-2010 AHA Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement, and (c) the 2007-2011 Medicare Cost Reports from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Because potential financial benefits attributable to EHR adoption may take some time to accrue, we ran regressions with lags of 1 and 2 years that included hospital and year fixed effects to examine the relationship between the level of EHR adoption and three hospital financial performance measures. Findings: A change in the level of EHR adoption was not associated with changes in operating margin or return on assets within hospitals. However, total margin was significantly improved, after 2 years, in hospitals that moved from no EHR to having a comprehensive EHR in all areas of their hospital (β = 0.030, p <.034). On the other hand, hospitals that increased their level of EHR adoption but did not achieve hospital-wide comprehensive adoption did not experience changes in any financial performance measures examined. Practice Implications: The improvements in total margin, as opposed to operating margin, are likely due to hospital incentive payments under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act that are reflected in nonpatient revenues and therefore show up in total margin calculations. Thus, after 2 years of EHR adoption, hospital financial performance is observed to improve based only on meaningful use incentive payments. More research will be needed to determine whether EHR adoption impacts financial performance on a longer time horizon.

KW - EHR

KW - financial performance

KW - meaningful use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977475718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977475718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000068

DO - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000068

M3 - Article

C2 - 26052785

AN - SCOPUS:84977475718

VL - 41

SP - 267

EP - 274

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 3

ER -