Does Increased Adenoma Detection Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer, and How Good Do We Need to Be?

Christen K. Dilly, Charles Kahi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely preventable with colonoscopy and other screening modalities. However, the effectiveness of screening and surveillance depends on the quality of the colonoscopy exam. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the best-validated metric by which we measure individual physicians’ performance. Recent Findings: Recent evidence suggests that ADR benchmarks may be inappropriately low. There is proof that improving ADR leads to significant reductions in post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC). Two studies have demonstrated that when a colonoscopy is performed by physicians with higher ADRs, patients are less likely to have advanced adenomas on surveillance and less likely to develop or die from PCCRC. Finally, there is at least some evidence that higher ADRs do not lead to more cumulative surveillance exams. Summary: The ADR is a useful outcome measure that can provide individual endoscopists and their patients with information about the likelihood of developing PCCRC. To achieve the lowest possible PCCRC rate, we should be striving for higher ADRs. While strategies and innovations may help a bit in improving ADRs, our efforts should focus on ensuring a complete mucosal exam for each patient. Behavioral psychology theories may provide useful frameworks for studying motivating factors that drive a careful exam.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number9
JournalCurrent gastroenterology reports
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Adenoma
Colorectal Neoplasms
Physicians
Benchmarking
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychology

Keywords

  • Colorectal neoplasms
  • Quality
  • Screening; colonoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Does Increased Adenoma Detection Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer, and How Good Do We Need to Be? / Dilly, Christen K.; Kahi, Charles.

In: Current gastroenterology reports, Vol. 21, No. 4, 9, 01.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{3c28113abd6146d5bebdaeeb38300cec,
title = "Does Increased Adenoma Detection Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer, and How Good Do We Need to Be?",
abstract = "Purpose of Review: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely preventable with colonoscopy and other screening modalities. However, the effectiveness of screening and surveillance depends on the quality of the colonoscopy exam. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the best-validated metric by which we measure individual physicians’ performance. Recent Findings: Recent evidence suggests that ADR benchmarks may be inappropriately low. There is proof that improving ADR leads to significant reductions in post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC). Two studies have demonstrated that when a colonoscopy is performed by physicians with higher ADRs, patients are less likely to have advanced adenomas on surveillance and less likely to develop or die from PCCRC. Finally, there is at least some evidence that higher ADRs do not lead to more cumulative surveillance exams. Summary: The ADR is a useful outcome measure that can provide individual endoscopists and their patients with information about the likelihood of developing PCCRC. To achieve the lowest possible PCCRC rate, we should be striving for higher ADRs. While strategies and innovations may help a bit in improving ADRs, our efforts should focus on ensuring a complete mucosal exam for each patient. Behavioral psychology theories may provide useful frameworks for studying motivating factors that drive a careful exam.",
keywords = "Colorectal neoplasms, Quality, Screening; colonoscopy",
author = "Dilly, {Christen K.} and Charles Kahi",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11894-019-0678-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
journal = "Current Gastroenterology Reports",
issn = "1522-8037",
publisher = "Current Medicine Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Increased Adenoma Detection Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer, and How Good Do We Need to Be?

AU - Dilly, Christen K.

AU - Kahi, Charles

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Purpose of Review: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely preventable with colonoscopy and other screening modalities. However, the effectiveness of screening and surveillance depends on the quality of the colonoscopy exam. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the best-validated metric by which we measure individual physicians’ performance. Recent Findings: Recent evidence suggests that ADR benchmarks may be inappropriately low. There is proof that improving ADR leads to significant reductions in post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC). Two studies have demonstrated that when a colonoscopy is performed by physicians with higher ADRs, patients are less likely to have advanced adenomas on surveillance and less likely to develop or die from PCCRC. Finally, there is at least some evidence that higher ADRs do not lead to more cumulative surveillance exams. Summary: The ADR is a useful outcome measure that can provide individual endoscopists and their patients with information about the likelihood of developing PCCRC. To achieve the lowest possible PCCRC rate, we should be striving for higher ADRs. While strategies and innovations may help a bit in improving ADRs, our efforts should focus on ensuring a complete mucosal exam for each patient. Behavioral psychology theories may provide useful frameworks for studying motivating factors that drive a careful exam.

AB - Purpose of Review: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely preventable with colonoscopy and other screening modalities. However, the effectiveness of screening and surveillance depends on the quality of the colonoscopy exam. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the best-validated metric by which we measure individual physicians’ performance. Recent Findings: Recent evidence suggests that ADR benchmarks may be inappropriately low. There is proof that improving ADR leads to significant reductions in post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC). Two studies have demonstrated that when a colonoscopy is performed by physicians with higher ADRs, patients are less likely to have advanced adenomas on surveillance and less likely to develop or die from PCCRC. Finally, there is at least some evidence that higher ADRs do not lead to more cumulative surveillance exams. Summary: The ADR is a useful outcome measure that can provide individual endoscopists and their patients with information about the likelihood of developing PCCRC. To achieve the lowest possible PCCRC rate, we should be striving for higher ADRs. While strategies and innovations may help a bit in improving ADRs, our efforts should focus on ensuring a complete mucosal exam for each patient. Behavioral psychology theories may provide useful frameworks for studying motivating factors that drive a careful exam.

KW - Colorectal neoplasms

KW - Quality

KW - Screening; colonoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062276321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062276321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11894-019-0678-5

DO - 10.1007/s11894-019-0678-5

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30815756

AN - SCOPUS:85062276321

VL - 21

JO - Current Gastroenterology Reports

JF - Current Gastroenterology Reports

SN - 1522-8037

IS - 4

M1 - 9

ER -