“Does the Organization of Plastic Surgery Units into Independent Departments Affect Academic Productivity?”

Scott N. Loewenstein, Stephen Duquette, Nakul Valsangkar, Umakanth Avula, Neha Lad, Juan Socas, Roberto L. Flores, Rajiv Sood, Leonidas Koniaris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: There is an increased push for plastic surgery units in the United States to become independent departments administered autonomously rather than as divisions of a multispecialty surgery department. The purpose of this research was to determine if there are any quantifiable differences in the academic performance of departments versus divisions. METHODS:: Using a list of the plastic surgery units affiliated with The American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons (ACAPS), unit websites were queried for departmental status and to obtain a list of affiliated faculty. Academic productivity was then quantified using the SCOPUS database. National Institute of Health (NIH) funding was determined through the Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools database. RESULTS:: Plastic surgery departments were comparable to divisions in academic productivity, evidenced by a similar number of publications per faculty (38.9 versus 38.7; p=0.94), number of citations per faculty (692 versus 761; p=0.64), H-indices (9.9 versus 9.9; p=0.99), and NIH grants (3.25 versus 2.84; p=0.80), including RO1 grants (1.33 versus 0.84; p=0.53). There was a trend for departments to have a more equitable male to female ratio (2.8 versus 4.1; p=0.06), and departments trained a greater number of integrated plastic surgery residents (9.0 versus 5.28; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS:: This study demonstrates that the academic performance of independent plastic surgery departments is generally similar to divisions, but with nuanced distinctions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 12 2017

Fingerprint

Plastic Surgery
Organizations
Organized Financing
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Databases
Research
Publications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

“Does the Organization of Plastic Surgery Units into Independent Departments Affect Academic Productivity?”. / Loewenstein, Scott N.; Duquette, Stephen; Valsangkar, Nakul; Avula, Umakanth; Lad, Neha; Socas, Juan; Flores, Roberto L.; Sood, Rajiv; Koniaris, Leonidas.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 12.07.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Loewenstein, Scott N. ; Duquette, Stephen ; Valsangkar, Nakul ; Avula, Umakanth ; Lad, Neha ; Socas, Juan ; Flores, Roberto L. ; Sood, Rajiv ; Koniaris, Leonidas. / “Does the Organization of Plastic Surgery Units into Independent Departments Affect Academic Productivity?”. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2017.
@article{ef2baef4d29c48d3bf275240accca4d6,
title = "“Does the Organization of Plastic Surgery Units into Independent Departments Affect Academic Productivity?”",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: There is an increased push for plastic surgery units in the United States to become independent departments administered autonomously rather than as divisions of a multispecialty surgery department. The purpose of this research was to determine if there are any quantifiable differences in the academic performance of departments versus divisions. METHODS:: Using a list of the plastic surgery units affiliated with The American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons (ACAPS), unit websites were queried for departmental status and to obtain a list of affiliated faculty. Academic productivity was then quantified using the SCOPUS database. National Institute of Health (NIH) funding was determined through the Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools database. RESULTS:: Plastic surgery departments were comparable to divisions in academic productivity, evidenced by a similar number of publications per faculty (38.9 versus 38.7; p=0.94), number of citations per faculty (692 versus 761; p=0.64), H-indices (9.9 versus 9.9; p=0.99), and NIH grants (3.25 versus 2.84; p=0.80), including RO1 grants (1.33 versus 0.84; p=0.53). There was a trend for departments to have a more equitable male to female ratio (2.8 versus 4.1; p=0.06), and departments trained a greater number of integrated plastic surgery residents (9.0 versus 5.28; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS:: This study demonstrates that the academic performance of independent plastic surgery departments is generally similar to divisions, but with nuanced distinctions.",
author = "Loewenstein, {Scott N.} and Stephen Duquette and Nakul Valsangkar and Umakanth Avula and Neha Lad and Juan Socas and Flores, {Roberto L.} and Rajiv Sood and Leonidas Koniaris",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000003772",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Does the Organization of Plastic Surgery Units into Independent Departments Affect Academic Productivity?”

AU - Loewenstein, Scott N.

AU - Duquette, Stephen

AU - Valsangkar, Nakul

AU - Avula, Umakanth

AU - Lad, Neha

AU - Socas, Juan

AU - Flores, Roberto L.

AU - Sood, Rajiv

AU - Koniaris, Leonidas

PY - 2017/7/12

Y1 - 2017/7/12

N2 - BACKGROUND:: There is an increased push for plastic surgery units in the United States to become independent departments administered autonomously rather than as divisions of a multispecialty surgery department. The purpose of this research was to determine if there are any quantifiable differences in the academic performance of departments versus divisions. METHODS:: Using a list of the plastic surgery units affiliated with The American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons (ACAPS), unit websites were queried for departmental status and to obtain a list of affiliated faculty. Academic productivity was then quantified using the SCOPUS database. National Institute of Health (NIH) funding was determined through the Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools database. RESULTS:: Plastic surgery departments were comparable to divisions in academic productivity, evidenced by a similar number of publications per faculty (38.9 versus 38.7; p=0.94), number of citations per faculty (692 versus 761; p=0.64), H-indices (9.9 versus 9.9; p=0.99), and NIH grants (3.25 versus 2.84; p=0.80), including RO1 grants (1.33 versus 0.84; p=0.53). There was a trend for departments to have a more equitable male to female ratio (2.8 versus 4.1; p=0.06), and departments trained a greater number of integrated plastic surgery residents (9.0 versus 5.28; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS:: This study demonstrates that the academic performance of independent plastic surgery departments is generally similar to divisions, but with nuanced distinctions.

AB - BACKGROUND:: There is an increased push for plastic surgery units in the United States to become independent departments administered autonomously rather than as divisions of a multispecialty surgery department. The purpose of this research was to determine if there are any quantifiable differences in the academic performance of departments versus divisions. METHODS:: Using a list of the plastic surgery units affiliated with The American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons (ACAPS), unit websites were queried for departmental status and to obtain a list of affiliated faculty. Academic productivity was then quantified using the SCOPUS database. National Institute of Health (NIH) funding was determined through the Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools database. RESULTS:: Plastic surgery departments were comparable to divisions in academic productivity, evidenced by a similar number of publications per faculty (38.9 versus 38.7; p=0.94), number of citations per faculty (692 versus 761; p=0.64), H-indices (9.9 versus 9.9; p=0.99), and NIH grants (3.25 versus 2.84; p=0.80), including RO1 grants (1.33 versus 0.84; p=0.53). There was a trend for departments to have a more equitable male to female ratio (2.8 versus 4.1; p=0.06), and departments trained a greater number of integrated plastic surgery residents (9.0 versus 5.28; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS:: This study demonstrates that the academic performance of independent plastic surgery departments is generally similar to divisions, but with nuanced distinctions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026216181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026216181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003772

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003772

M3 - Article

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

ER -