Abstract
Context: While as many as 5 million individuals in the United States have dementia, many others have memory complaints. Brief tests to screen for cognitive impairment could help guide dementia diagnosis. Objective: To review the literature concerning the practicality and accuracy of brief cognitive screening instruments in primary care. Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE (including data from AIDSLINE, BioethicsLine, and HealthSTAR) and psycINFO was conducted from January 2000 through April 2006 to update previous reviews. Study Selection: Studies of patients aged 60 years and older and use of an acceptable criterion standard to diagnose dementia were considered. Data Extraction: Studies were assessed by 2 independent reviewers for eligibility and quality. A third independent reviewer adjudicated disagreements. Data for likelihood ratios (LRs) were extracted. Data Synthesis: Twenty-nine studies using 25 different screening instruments met inclusion criteria; some studies evaluated several different instruments, thus, information could be examined for 38 unique instrument/study combinations. Results: For the commonly used Mini-Mental State Examination, the median LR for a positive result was 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-47.0) and the median LR for a negative result was 0.19 (95%CI, 0.06-0.37). Briefer approaches are available but have not been studied as frequently. Reports from an informant that the patient has memory loss yields an LR of 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4-9.6) for dementia. The Memory Impairment Screen takes 4 minutes to ask 4 items and has an LR for a positive result of 33 (95% CI, 15.0-72.0) and an LR for a negative result is 0.08 (95% CI, 0.02-0.3). Clock drawings are helpful in 1- to 3-minute forms, but must be scored appropriately and sensitivity to mild forms of impairment can be low. Conclusions: Clinicians should select 1 primary tool based on (1) the population receiving care; (2) an awareness of the effects of educational level, race, and age on scoring; and (3) consideration of adding 1 or 2 other tools for special situations as needed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2391-2404 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Medical Association |
| Volume | 297 |
| Issue number | 21 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 6 2007 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
Does this patient have dementia? / Holsinger, Tracey; Deveau, Janie; Boustani, Malaz; Williams, John W.
In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 297, No. 21, 06.06.2007, p. 2391-2404.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Does this patient have dementia?
AU - Holsinger, Tracey
AU - Deveau, Janie
AU - Boustani, Malaz
AU - Williams, John W.
PY - 2007/6/6
Y1 - 2007/6/6
N2 - Context: While as many as 5 million individuals in the United States have dementia, many others have memory complaints. Brief tests to screen for cognitive impairment could help guide dementia diagnosis. Objective: To review the literature concerning the practicality and accuracy of brief cognitive screening instruments in primary care. Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE (including data from AIDSLINE, BioethicsLine, and HealthSTAR) and psycINFO was conducted from January 2000 through April 2006 to update previous reviews. Study Selection: Studies of patients aged 60 years and older and use of an acceptable criterion standard to diagnose dementia were considered. Data Extraction: Studies were assessed by 2 independent reviewers for eligibility and quality. A third independent reviewer adjudicated disagreements. Data for likelihood ratios (LRs) were extracted. Data Synthesis: Twenty-nine studies using 25 different screening instruments met inclusion criteria; some studies evaluated several different instruments, thus, information could be examined for 38 unique instrument/study combinations. Results: For the commonly used Mini-Mental State Examination, the median LR for a positive result was 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-47.0) and the median LR for a negative result was 0.19 (95%CI, 0.06-0.37). Briefer approaches are available but have not been studied as frequently. Reports from an informant that the patient has memory loss yields an LR of 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4-9.6) for dementia. The Memory Impairment Screen takes 4 minutes to ask 4 items and has an LR for a positive result of 33 (95% CI, 15.0-72.0) and an LR for a negative result is 0.08 (95% CI, 0.02-0.3). Clock drawings are helpful in 1- to 3-minute forms, but must be scored appropriately and sensitivity to mild forms of impairment can be low. Conclusions: Clinicians should select 1 primary tool based on (1) the population receiving care; (2) an awareness of the effects of educational level, race, and age on scoring; and (3) consideration of adding 1 or 2 other tools for special situations as needed.
AB - Context: While as many as 5 million individuals in the United States have dementia, many others have memory complaints. Brief tests to screen for cognitive impairment could help guide dementia diagnosis. Objective: To review the literature concerning the practicality and accuracy of brief cognitive screening instruments in primary care. Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE (including data from AIDSLINE, BioethicsLine, and HealthSTAR) and psycINFO was conducted from January 2000 through April 2006 to update previous reviews. Study Selection: Studies of patients aged 60 years and older and use of an acceptable criterion standard to diagnose dementia were considered. Data Extraction: Studies were assessed by 2 independent reviewers for eligibility and quality. A third independent reviewer adjudicated disagreements. Data for likelihood ratios (LRs) were extracted. Data Synthesis: Twenty-nine studies using 25 different screening instruments met inclusion criteria; some studies evaluated several different instruments, thus, information could be examined for 38 unique instrument/study combinations. Results: For the commonly used Mini-Mental State Examination, the median LR for a positive result was 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-47.0) and the median LR for a negative result was 0.19 (95%CI, 0.06-0.37). Briefer approaches are available but have not been studied as frequently. Reports from an informant that the patient has memory loss yields an LR of 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4-9.6) for dementia. The Memory Impairment Screen takes 4 minutes to ask 4 items and has an LR for a positive result of 33 (95% CI, 15.0-72.0) and an LR for a negative result is 0.08 (95% CI, 0.02-0.3). Clock drawings are helpful in 1- to 3-minute forms, but must be scored appropriately and sensitivity to mild forms of impairment can be low. Conclusions: Clinicians should select 1 primary tool based on (1) the population receiving care; (2) an awareness of the effects of educational level, race, and age on scoring; and (3) consideration of adding 1 or 2 other tools for special situations as needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250027957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250027957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.297.21.2391
DO - 10.1001/jama.297.21.2391
M3 - Article
C2 - 17551132
AN - SCOPUS:34250027957
VL - 297
SP - 2391
EP - 2404
JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
SN - 0002-9955
IS - 21
ER -