Does wide primary perirectal dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy alter pathologic and biochemical outcomes?

Andrew M. Dussinger, Stephen D W Beck, Liang Cheng, Michael Koch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to evaluate wide primary perirectal dissection (WR) during the course of radical prostatectomy as a technique to decrease positive surgical margin rates and improve subsequent biochemical outcomes. A retrospective review of a single surgeon's series of 320 patients, including 61 who underwent WR, from 1998 to the present was performed. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on preoperative data known to predict time to prostate cancer mortality. Pathologic outcomes were tabulated and biochemical outcomes were analyzed at follow-up. Comparisons were made between WR and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with or without nerve sparing based on these parameters within each risk group. Kaplan-Meier, multivariate, and propensity score analyses were used to evaluate the impact of surgical technique on biochemical recurrence. Urinary morbidity was compared using a retrospective review of University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Symptom Index self-questionnaires. No increase in urinary or rectal morbidity was noted using the WR technique. A statistically significant decrease in positive surgical margins was noted in the high-risk population (55% vs 16%, P = 0.010) in favor of WR. Biochemical failure was similar between groups (WR vs RRP), and no biochemical survival advantage could be documented. Thus, the WR technique may successfully decrease the rate of positive surgical margins in a high-risk group without any increased urinary morbidity. This technique may affect only local control because biochemical recurrence rates were not statistically different. This finding implies the presence of occult metastatic disease at the time of surgery. A larger population with better-matched subjects is needed to clarify the potential role of WR in an intermediate-risk population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-100
Number of pages6
JournalUrology
Volume66
Issue number5 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Dissection
Morbidity
Prostatic Neoplasms
Population
Recurrence
Propensity Score
Los Angeles
Survival
Mortality
Margins of Excision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Does wide primary perirectal dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy alter pathologic and biochemical outcomes? / Dussinger, Andrew M.; Beck, Stephen D W; Cheng, Liang; Koch, Michael.

In: Urology, Vol. 66, No. 5 SUPPL., 11.2005, p. 95-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b972c3c56d0486db04d2c6335ab45e8,
title = "Does wide primary perirectal dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy alter pathologic and biochemical outcomes?",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to evaluate wide primary perirectal dissection (WR) during the course of radical prostatectomy as a technique to decrease positive surgical margin rates and improve subsequent biochemical outcomes. A retrospective review of a single surgeon's series of 320 patients, including 61 who underwent WR, from 1998 to the present was performed. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on preoperative data known to predict time to prostate cancer mortality. Pathologic outcomes were tabulated and biochemical outcomes were analyzed at follow-up. Comparisons were made between WR and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with or without nerve sparing based on these parameters within each risk group. Kaplan-Meier, multivariate, and propensity score analyses were used to evaluate the impact of surgical technique on biochemical recurrence. Urinary morbidity was compared using a retrospective review of University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Symptom Index self-questionnaires. No increase in urinary or rectal morbidity was noted using the WR technique. A statistically significant decrease in positive surgical margins was noted in the high-risk population (55{\%} vs 16{\%}, P = 0.010) in favor of WR. Biochemical failure was similar between groups (WR vs RRP), and no biochemical survival advantage could be documented. Thus, the WR technique may successfully decrease the rate of positive surgical margins in a high-risk group without any increased urinary morbidity. This technique may affect only local control because biochemical recurrence rates were not statistically different. This finding implies the presence of occult metastatic disease at the time of surgery. A larger population with better-matched subjects is needed to clarify the potential role of WR in an intermediate-risk population.",
author = "Dussinger, {Andrew M.} and Beck, {Stephen D W} and Liang Cheng and Michael Koch",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.083",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "95--100",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does wide primary perirectal dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy alter pathologic and biochemical outcomes?

AU - Dussinger, Andrew M.

AU - Beck, Stephen D W

AU - Cheng, Liang

AU - Koch, Michael

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - The aim of this article is to evaluate wide primary perirectal dissection (WR) during the course of radical prostatectomy as a technique to decrease positive surgical margin rates and improve subsequent biochemical outcomes. A retrospective review of a single surgeon's series of 320 patients, including 61 who underwent WR, from 1998 to the present was performed. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on preoperative data known to predict time to prostate cancer mortality. Pathologic outcomes were tabulated and biochemical outcomes were analyzed at follow-up. Comparisons were made between WR and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with or without nerve sparing based on these parameters within each risk group. Kaplan-Meier, multivariate, and propensity score analyses were used to evaluate the impact of surgical technique on biochemical recurrence. Urinary morbidity was compared using a retrospective review of University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Symptom Index self-questionnaires. No increase in urinary or rectal morbidity was noted using the WR technique. A statistically significant decrease in positive surgical margins was noted in the high-risk population (55% vs 16%, P = 0.010) in favor of WR. Biochemical failure was similar between groups (WR vs RRP), and no biochemical survival advantage could be documented. Thus, the WR technique may successfully decrease the rate of positive surgical margins in a high-risk group without any increased urinary morbidity. This technique may affect only local control because biochemical recurrence rates were not statistically different. This finding implies the presence of occult metastatic disease at the time of surgery. A larger population with better-matched subjects is needed to clarify the potential role of WR in an intermediate-risk population.

AB - The aim of this article is to evaluate wide primary perirectal dissection (WR) during the course of radical prostatectomy as a technique to decrease positive surgical margin rates and improve subsequent biochemical outcomes. A retrospective review of a single surgeon's series of 320 patients, including 61 who underwent WR, from 1998 to the present was performed. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on preoperative data known to predict time to prostate cancer mortality. Pathologic outcomes were tabulated and biochemical outcomes were analyzed at follow-up. Comparisons were made between WR and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with or without nerve sparing based on these parameters within each risk group. Kaplan-Meier, multivariate, and propensity score analyses were used to evaluate the impact of surgical technique on biochemical recurrence. Urinary morbidity was compared using a retrospective review of University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Symptom Index self-questionnaires. No increase in urinary or rectal morbidity was noted using the WR technique. A statistically significant decrease in positive surgical margins was noted in the high-risk population (55% vs 16%, P = 0.010) in favor of WR. Biochemical failure was similar between groups (WR vs RRP), and no biochemical survival advantage could be documented. Thus, the WR technique may successfully decrease the rate of positive surgical margins in a high-risk group without any increased urinary morbidity. This technique may affect only local control because biochemical recurrence rates were not statistically different. This finding implies the presence of occult metastatic disease at the time of surgery. A larger population with better-matched subjects is needed to clarify the potential role of WR in an intermediate-risk population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144508747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25144508747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.083

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.083

M3 - Article

C2 - 16194713

AN - SCOPUS:25144508747

VL - 66

SP - 95

EP - 100

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 5 SUPPL.

ER -