Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

W. Robert Lee, Allan F. Deguzman, Kevin P. McMullen, David L. McCullough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To describe the relationship between two commonly used dosimetric quantifiers (dose received by 90% of the prostate [D90] and volume receiving 100% of dose [V100]) and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in a cohort of men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB). Methods and materials The information in this report concerned the first 63 men treated with LDRPB alone at our institution between September 1997 and September 1998. All men had histologically confirmed, clinically localized prostate cancer. All men were treated with125I. The prescription dose was 144 Gy according to the Task Group 43 formalism. LDRPB was performed jointly by a radiation oncologist and urologist. Dosimetric quantifiers (D 90, V100) were calculated from a CT scan performed 1 month after LDRPB. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was estimated using the product-limit method. D90 and V100 were examined as putative covariates for bRFS using the proportional hazards regression method. All p values are two-sided. Results The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The median D90 was 122 Gy (range, 57-171Gy), and in 16 (25%) of 63 patients, the calculated D90 was >140 Gy. The median V100 was 81% (range, 51-97%). Nine men developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 19 months (range, 6-38 months). The 5-year estimate of bRFS was 85% (95% confidence interval, 80-90%). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to D 90 were as follows: D90 ≥140 Gy, 86%; D90 <140 Gy, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of D90 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of bRFS until the D 90 was <80 Gy (D90 ≥80 Gy, 89%; D90 <80 Gy, 50%; p = 0.02). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to V 100 were as follows: V100 ≥85%, 87%; V100 <85%, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of V 100 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of BRFS unless the dosimetry was particularly poor. The 5-year BRFS was 89% if the V100 was ≥65% compared with 40% if the V100 was <65% (p = 0.006). Conclusion The dosimetric quantifiers described in this report did not predict for bRFS after LDRPB unless the dosimetry was very poor. This finding is not in complete agreement with those of previous reports. Possible reasons for this observation are (1) the study in underpowered, (2) inherent measurement error, (3) dosimetric quantifiers are poor surrogates of the dose received by the cancer, and (4) length of follow-up. Additional work in the area of quality assessment after LDRPB is required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-59
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Brachytherapy
dosimeters
Prostate
cancer
Recurrence
dosage
Survival
Neoplasms
estimates
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
hazards
Disease-Free Survival
Prescriptions
regression analysis
confidence
Prostatic Neoplasms
Confidence Intervals
formalism
intervals
radiation

Keywords

  • I
  • PSA
  • Prostate brachytherapy
  • dosimetry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. / Robert Lee, W.; Deguzman, Allan F.; McMullen, Kevin P.; McCullough, David L.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 61, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 52-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Robert Lee, W. ; Deguzman, Allan F. ; McMullen, Kevin P. ; McCullough, David L. / Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2005 ; Vol. 61, No. 1. pp. 52-59.
@article{d084da543a314828bab7f379076f8eb3,
title = "Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy",
abstract = "Purpose To describe the relationship between two commonly used dosimetric quantifiers (dose received by 90{\%} of the prostate [D90] and volume receiving 100{\%} of dose [V100]) and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in a cohort of men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB). Methods and materials The information in this report concerned the first 63 men treated with LDRPB alone at our institution between September 1997 and September 1998. All men had histologically confirmed, clinically localized prostate cancer. All men were treated with125I. The prescription dose was 144 Gy according to the Task Group 43 formalism. LDRPB was performed jointly by a radiation oncologist and urologist. Dosimetric quantifiers (D 90, V100) were calculated from a CT scan performed 1 month after LDRPB. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was estimated using the product-limit method. D90 and V100 were examined as putative covariates for bRFS using the proportional hazards regression method. All p values are two-sided. Results The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The median D90 was 122 Gy (range, 57-171Gy), and in 16 (25{\%}) of 63 patients, the calculated D90 was >140 Gy. The median V100 was 81{\%} (range, 51-97{\%}). Nine men developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 19 months (range, 6-38 months). The 5-year estimate of bRFS was 85{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval, 80-90{\%}). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to D 90 were as follows: D90 ≥140 Gy, 86{\%}; D90 <140 Gy, 84{\%} (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of D90 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of bRFS until the D 90 was <80 Gy (D90 ≥80 Gy, 89{\%}; D90 <80 Gy, 50{\%}; p = 0.02). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to V 100 were as follows: V100 ≥85{\%}, 87{\%}; V100 <85{\%}, 84{\%} (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of V 100 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of BRFS unless the dosimetry was particularly poor. The 5-year BRFS was 89{\%} if the V100 was ≥65{\%} compared with 40{\%} if the V100 was <65{\%} (p = 0.006). Conclusion The dosimetric quantifiers described in this report did not predict for bRFS after LDRPB unless the dosimetry was very poor. This finding is not in complete agreement with those of previous reports. Possible reasons for this observation are (1) the study in underpowered, (2) inherent measurement error, (3) dosimetric quantifiers are poor surrogates of the dose received by the cancer, and (4) length of follow-up. Additional work in the area of quality assessment after LDRPB is required.",
keywords = "I, PSA, Prostate brachytherapy, dosimetry",
author = "{Robert Lee}, W. and Deguzman, {Allan F.} and McMullen, {Kevin P.} and McCullough, {David L.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "52--59",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

AU - Robert Lee, W.

AU - Deguzman, Allan F.

AU - McMullen, Kevin P.

AU - McCullough, David L.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Purpose To describe the relationship between two commonly used dosimetric quantifiers (dose received by 90% of the prostate [D90] and volume receiving 100% of dose [V100]) and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in a cohort of men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB). Methods and materials The information in this report concerned the first 63 men treated with LDRPB alone at our institution between September 1997 and September 1998. All men had histologically confirmed, clinically localized prostate cancer. All men were treated with125I. The prescription dose was 144 Gy according to the Task Group 43 formalism. LDRPB was performed jointly by a radiation oncologist and urologist. Dosimetric quantifiers (D 90, V100) were calculated from a CT scan performed 1 month after LDRPB. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was estimated using the product-limit method. D90 and V100 were examined as putative covariates for bRFS using the proportional hazards regression method. All p values are two-sided. Results The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The median D90 was 122 Gy (range, 57-171Gy), and in 16 (25%) of 63 patients, the calculated D90 was >140 Gy. The median V100 was 81% (range, 51-97%). Nine men developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 19 months (range, 6-38 months). The 5-year estimate of bRFS was 85% (95% confidence interval, 80-90%). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to D 90 were as follows: D90 ≥140 Gy, 86%; D90 <140 Gy, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of D90 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of bRFS until the D 90 was <80 Gy (D90 ≥80 Gy, 89%; D90 <80 Gy, 50%; p = 0.02). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to V 100 were as follows: V100 ≥85%, 87%; V100 <85%, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of V 100 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of BRFS unless the dosimetry was particularly poor. The 5-year BRFS was 89% if the V100 was ≥65% compared with 40% if the V100 was <65% (p = 0.006). Conclusion The dosimetric quantifiers described in this report did not predict for bRFS after LDRPB unless the dosimetry was very poor. This finding is not in complete agreement with those of previous reports. Possible reasons for this observation are (1) the study in underpowered, (2) inherent measurement error, (3) dosimetric quantifiers are poor surrogates of the dose received by the cancer, and (4) length of follow-up. Additional work in the area of quality assessment after LDRPB is required.

AB - Purpose To describe the relationship between two commonly used dosimetric quantifiers (dose received by 90% of the prostate [D90] and volume receiving 100% of dose [V100]) and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in a cohort of men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB). Methods and materials The information in this report concerned the first 63 men treated with LDRPB alone at our institution between September 1997 and September 1998. All men had histologically confirmed, clinically localized prostate cancer. All men were treated with125I. The prescription dose was 144 Gy according to the Task Group 43 formalism. LDRPB was performed jointly by a radiation oncologist and urologist. Dosimetric quantifiers (D 90, V100) were calculated from a CT scan performed 1 month after LDRPB. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was estimated using the product-limit method. D90 and V100 were examined as putative covariates for bRFS using the proportional hazards regression method. All p values are two-sided. Results The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The median D90 was 122 Gy (range, 57-171Gy), and in 16 (25%) of 63 patients, the calculated D90 was >140 Gy. The median V100 was 81% (range, 51-97%). Nine men developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 19 months (range, 6-38 months). The 5-year estimate of bRFS was 85% (95% confidence interval, 80-90%). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to D 90 were as follows: D90 ≥140 Gy, 86%; D90 <140 Gy, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of D90 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of bRFS until the D 90 was <80 Gy (D90 ≥80 Gy, 89%; D90 <80 Gy, 50%; p = 0.02). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to V 100 were as follows: V100 ≥85%, 87%; V100 <85%, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of V 100 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of BRFS unless the dosimetry was particularly poor. The 5-year BRFS was 89% if the V100 was ≥65% compared with 40% if the V100 was <65% (p = 0.006). Conclusion The dosimetric quantifiers described in this report did not predict for bRFS after LDRPB unless the dosimetry was very poor. This finding is not in complete agreement with those of previous reports. Possible reasons for this observation are (1) the study in underpowered, (2) inherent measurement error, (3) dosimetric quantifiers are poor surrogates of the dose received by the cancer, and (4) length of follow-up. Additional work in the area of quality assessment after LDRPB is required.

KW - I

KW - PSA

KW - Prostate brachytherapy

KW - dosimetry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11144277836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11144277836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 15629593

AN - SCOPUS:11144277836

VL - 61

SP - 52

EP - 59

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 1

ER -