Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with single-dose pantoprazole for laryngopharyngeal reflux

John Wo, Jennifer Koopman, Steven P. Harrell, Ken Parker, Welby Winstead, Eric Lentsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Results of randomized treatment trials for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are mixed. The cause and effect between gastroesophageal reflux and laryngeal symptoms remain elusive. AIMS: To determine the efficacy of single-dose pantoprazole in newly diagnosed LPR and to correlate hypopharyngeal reflux with symptom improvement. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed with a 2-wk run-in, 12-wk treatment period (pantoprazole 40 mg q.a.m. or placebo), and 4-wk follow-up. Study criteria were laryngeal complaints >3 days/wk and a positive triple-sensor pH test. Laryngeal exam was graded using a reflux finding score before and after treatment. Repeat pH test was performed on study drug at week 12. Weekly diaries were kept on symptom severity and global assessment. Total laryngeal symptom score was defined as the sum of six laryngeal symptoms. Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and Pearson tests were used. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects (13 M/26 F, median age 39 yr) were randomized; 35 completed the study. During the treatment period, total laryngeal symptom scores significantly improved compared with pretreatment scores in both study groups, but there were no significant differences between them. Forty percent of pantoprazole group reported adequate relief at week 12, compared with 42% of placebo group (p = 0.89). No significant improvement in hypopharyngeal reflux was found in either study group. There were no significant correlations between laryngeal reflux finding scores and hypopharyngeal reflux episodes with symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Response was similar between single-dose pantoprazole and placebo in newly diagnosed LPR. Our results suggested that laryngeal exam was not useful in following treatment response. Hypopharyngeal reflux may represent acid reflux or artifacts, but is not likely the underlying cause.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1972-1978
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume101
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Placebos
Therapeutics
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Artifacts
pantoprazole
Acids
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with single-dose pantoprazole for laryngopharyngeal reflux. / Wo, John; Koopman, Jennifer; Harrell, Steven P.; Parker, Ken; Winstead, Welby; Lentsch, Eric.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 101, No. 9, 09.2006, p. 1972-1978.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wo, John ; Koopman, Jennifer ; Harrell, Steven P. ; Parker, Ken ; Winstead, Welby ; Lentsch, Eric. / Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with single-dose pantoprazole for laryngopharyngeal reflux. In: American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006 ; Vol. 101, No. 9. pp. 1972-1978.
@article{d4d77bec162349f9ab2b945067d059dc,
title = "Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with single-dose pantoprazole for laryngopharyngeal reflux",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Results of randomized treatment trials for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are mixed. The cause and effect between gastroesophageal reflux and laryngeal symptoms remain elusive. AIMS: To determine the efficacy of single-dose pantoprazole in newly diagnosed LPR and to correlate hypopharyngeal reflux with symptom improvement. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed with a 2-wk run-in, 12-wk treatment period (pantoprazole 40 mg q.a.m. or placebo), and 4-wk follow-up. Study criteria were laryngeal complaints >3 days/wk and a positive triple-sensor pH test. Laryngeal exam was graded using a reflux finding score before and after treatment. Repeat pH test was performed on study drug at week 12. Weekly diaries were kept on symptom severity and global assessment. Total laryngeal symptom score was defined as the sum of six laryngeal symptoms. Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and Pearson tests were used. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects (13 M/26 F, median age 39 yr) were randomized; 35 completed the study. During the treatment period, total laryngeal symptom scores significantly improved compared with pretreatment scores in both study groups, but there were no significant differences between them. Forty percent of pantoprazole group reported adequate relief at week 12, compared with 42{\%} of placebo group (p = 0.89). No significant improvement in hypopharyngeal reflux was found in either study group. There were no significant correlations between laryngeal reflux finding scores and hypopharyngeal reflux episodes with symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Response was similar between single-dose pantoprazole and placebo in newly diagnosed LPR. Our results suggested that laryngeal exam was not useful in following treatment response. Hypopharyngeal reflux may represent acid reflux or artifacts, but is not likely the underlying cause.",
author = "John Wo and Jennifer Koopman and Harrell, {Steven P.} and Ken Parker and Welby Winstead and Eric Lentsch",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00693.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "1972--1978",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with single-dose pantoprazole for laryngopharyngeal reflux

AU - Wo, John

AU - Koopman, Jennifer

AU - Harrell, Steven P.

AU - Parker, Ken

AU - Winstead, Welby

AU - Lentsch, Eric

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Results of randomized treatment trials for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are mixed. The cause and effect between gastroesophageal reflux and laryngeal symptoms remain elusive. AIMS: To determine the efficacy of single-dose pantoprazole in newly diagnosed LPR and to correlate hypopharyngeal reflux with symptom improvement. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed with a 2-wk run-in, 12-wk treatment period (pantoprazole 40 mg q.a.m. or placebo), and 4-wk follow-up. Study criteria were laryngeal complaints >3 days/wk and a positive triple-sensor pH test. Laryngeal exam was graded using a reflux finding score before and after treatment. Repeat pH test was performed on study drug at week 12. Weekly diaries were kept on symptom severity and global assessment. Total laryngeal symptom score was defined as the sum of six laryngeal symptoms. Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and Pearson tests were used. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects (13 M/26 F, median age 39 yr) were randomized; 35 completed the study. During the treatment period, total laryngeal symptom scores significantly improved compared with pretreatment scores in both study groups, but there were no significant differences between them. Forty percent of pantoprazole group reported adequate relief at week 12, compared with 42% of placebo group (p = 0.89). No significant improvement in hypopharyngeal reflux was found in either study group. There were no significant correlations between laryngeal reflux finding scores and hypopharyngeal reflux episodes with symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Response was similar between single-dose pantoprazole and placebo in newly diagnosed LPR. Our results suggested that laryngeal exam was not useful in following treatment response. Hypopharyngeal reflux may represent acid reflux or artifacts, but is not likely the underlying cause.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Results of randomized treatment trials for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are mixed. The cause and effect between gastroesophageal reflux and laryngeal symptoms remain elusive. AIMS: To determine the efficacy of single-dose pantoprazole in newly diagnosed LPR and to correlate hypopharyngeal reflux with symptom improvement. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed with a 2-wk run-in, 12-wk treatment period (pantoprazole 40 mg q.a.m. or placebo), and 4-wk follow-up. Study criteria were laryngeal complaints >3 days/wk and a positive triple-sensor pH test. Laryngeal exam was graded using a reflux finding score before and after treatment. Repeat pH test was performed on study drug at week 12. Weekly diaries were kept on symptom severity and global assessment. Total laryngeal symptom score was defined as the sum of six laryngeal symptoms. Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and Pearson tests were used. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects (13 M/26 F, median age 39 yr) were randomized; 35 completed the study. During the treatment period, total laryngeal symptom scores significantly improved compared with pretreatment scores in both study groups, but there were no significant differences between them. Forty percent of pantoprazole group reported adequate relief at week 12, compared with 42% of placebo group (p = 0.89). No significant improvement in hypopharyngeal reflux was found in either study group. There were no significant correlations between laryngeal reflux finding scores and hypopharyngeal reflux episodes with symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Response was similar between single-dose pantoprazole and placebo in newly diagnosed LPR. Our results suggested that laryngeal exam was not useful in following treatment response. Hypopharyngeal reflux may represent acid reflux or artifacts, but is not likely the underlying cause.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748361790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748361790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00693.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00693.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16968502

AN - SCOPUS:33748361790

VL - 101

SP - 1972

EP - 1978

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 9

ER -