Early experience in interfacing PACS to RIS

Johannes M. Boehme, Robert Choplin, C. Douglas Maynard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Picture Archiving and Communications Systems are sophisticated computer systems designed to store and display medical images. It has been suggested that these systems may be more cost effective than film in practicing radiology because of better access to images by multiple users, better integration of information from multiple studies, and more rapid delivery of diagnostic reports to clinical physicians. Development of these systems is in its early stages and questions have arisen as to what functions an image management system should have and how it should interact with stand alone radiology information systems (RIS) and hospital information systems (HIS)1. Over the past decade, computer systems have undergone gradual reorganization from highly centralized hospital (or medical center) information systems toward decentralized departmental systems. The former systems often provided global functions but did not have the flexibility to meet the needs of individual departments. Some individual departmental systems were developed to meet specific requirements, but they were often unable to communicate with other systems within a medical center. Today many RIS’s have the ability to provide departmental management tools, as well as to communicate with external systems. In order to achieve a filmless environment, PACS and HIS must be integrated with RIS systems to provide the level of information currently available. An additional goal of these systems is to automate operations and reduce the workload for technologists, admission personnel, file room staff, and radiologists. In 1986, we developed a long-range plan to convert to an all electronic department through the integration of three stand alone systems: RIS, PACS, and HIS. Because of our experience with a fully functional RIS since 1981, we elected to use it as the center to which the remaining systems could be integrated. Utilizing the RIS as the hub provides continuity to the department while the other systems are being developed and will thereby reduce overall disruptions within the working department. An image management system was installed in 1987. This system was initially independent from the RIS and patient demographic data needed to be entered into both systems when a study was performed. Between January 1987 and October 1988, we have worked with the commercial venders to integrate the RIS and PACS. This manuscript will discuss our early experience in integrating an RIS to an expanding PACS system2.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)589-596
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume1093
DOIs
StatePublished - May 25 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Picture archiving and communication systems
Radiology
radiology
information systems
Information Systems
Information systems
Computer systems
management systems
Experience
hubs
physicians
personnel
files
continuity
rooms
telecommunication
delivery
flexibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Early experience in interfacing PACS to RIS. / Boehme, Johannes M.; Choplin, Robert; Douglas Maynard, C.

In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 1093, 25.05.1989, p. 589-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c534c7d73744a6289cd3c8ee0065c81,
title = "Early experience in interfacing PACS to RIS",
abstract = "Picture Archiving and Communications Systems are sophisticated computer systems designed to store and display medical images. It has been suggested that these systems may be more cost effective than film in practicing radiology because of better access to images by multiple users, better integration of information from multiple studies, and more rapid delivery of diagnostic reports to clinical physicians. Development of these systems is in its early stages and questions have arisen as to what functions an image management system should have and how it should interact with stand alone radiology information systems (RIS) and hospital information systems (HIS)1. Over the past decade, computer systems have undergone gradual reorganization from highly centralized hospital (or medical center) information systems toward decentralized departmental systems. The former systems often provided global functions but did not have the flexibility to meet the needs of individual departments. Some individual departmental systems were developed to meet specific requirements, but they were often unable to communicate with other systems within a medical center. Today many RIS’s have the ability to provide departmental management tools, as well as to communicate with external systems. In order to achieve a filmless environment, PACS and HIS must be integrated with RIS systems to provide the level of information currently available. An additional goal of these systems is to automate operations and reduce the workload for technologists, admission personnel, file room staff, and radiologists. In 1986, we developed a long-range plan to convert to an all electronic department through the integration of three stand alone systems: RIS, PACS, and HIS. Because of our experience with a fully functional RIS since 1981, we elected to use it as the center to which the remaining systems could be integrated. Utilizing the RIS as the hub provides continuity to the department while the other systems are being developed and will thereby reduce overall disruptions within the working department. An image management system was installed in 1987. This system was initially independent from the RIS and patient demographic data needed to be entered into both systems when a study was performed. Between January 1987 and October 1988, we have worked with the commercial venders to integrate the RIS and PACS. This manuscript will discuss our early experience in integrating an RIS to an expanding PACS system2.",
author = "Boehme, {Johannes M.} and Robert Choplin and {Douglas Maynard}, C.",
year = "1989",
month = "5",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1117/12.953378",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1093",
pages = "589--596",
journal = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",
issn = "0277-786X",
publisher = "SPIE",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early experience in interfacing PACS to RIS

AU - Boehme, Johannes M.

AU - Choplin, Robert

AU - Douglas Maynard, C.

PY - 1989/5/25

Y1 - 1989/5/25

N2 - Picture Archiving and Communications Systems are sophisticated computer systems designed to store and display medical images. It has been suggested that these systems may be more cost effective than film in practicing radiology because of better access to images by multiple users, better integration of information from multiple studies, and more rapid delivery of diagnostic reports to clinical physicians. Development of these systems is in its early stages and questions have arisen as to what functions an image management system should have and how it should interact with stand alone radiology information systems (RIS) and hospital information systems (HIS)1. Over the past decade, computer systems have undergone gradual reorganization from highly centralized hospital (or medical center) information systems toward decentralized departmental systems. The former systems often provided global functions but did not have the flexibility to meet the needs of individual departments. Some individual departmental systems were developed to meet specific requirements, but they were often unable to communicate with other systems within a medical center. Today many RIS’s have the ability to provide departmental management tools, as well as to communicate with external systems. In order to achieve a filmless environment, PACS and HIS must be integrated with RIS systems to provide the level of information currently available. An additional goal of these systems is to automate operations and reduce the workload for technologists, admission personnel, file room staff, and radiologists. In 1986, we developed a long-range plan to convert to an all electronic department through the integration of three stand alone systems: RIS, PACS, and HIS. Because of our experience with a fully functional RIS since 1981, we elected to use it as the center to which the remaining systems could be integrated. Utilizing the RIS as the hub provides continuity to the department while the other systems are being developed and will thereby reduce overall disruptions within the working department. An image management system was installed in 1987. This system was initially independent from the RIS and patient demographic data needed to be entered into both systems when a study was performed. Between January 1987 and October 1988, we have worked with the commercial venders to integrate the RIS and PACS. This manuscript will discuss our early experience in integrating an RIS to an expanding PACS system2.

AB - Picture Archiving and Communications Systems are sophisticated computer systems designed to store and display medical images. It has been suggested that these systems may be more cost effective than film in practicing radiology because of better access to images by multiple users, better integration of information from multiple studies, and more rapid delivery of diagnostic reports to clinical physicians. Development of these systems is in its early stages and questions have arisen as to what functions an image management system should have and how it should interact with stand alone radiology information systems (RIS) and hospital information systems (HIS)1. Over the past decade, computer systems have undergone gradual reorganization from highly centralized hospital (or medical center) information systems toward decentralized departmental systems. The former systems often provided global functions but did not have the flexibility to meet the needs of individual departments. Some individual departmental systems were developed to meet specific requirements, but they were often unable to communicate with other systems within a medical center. Today many RIS’s have the ability to provide departmental management tools, as well as to communicate with external systems. In order to achieve a filmless environment, PACS and HIS must be integrated with RIS systems to provide the level of information currently available. An additional goal of these systems is to automate operations and reduce the workload for technologists, admission personnel, file room staff, and radiologists. In 1986, we developed a long-range plan to convert to an all electronic department through the integration of three stand alone systems: RIS, PACS, and HIS. Because of our experience with a fully functional RIS since 1981, we elected to use it as the center to which the remaining systems could be integrated. Utilizing the RIS as the hub provides continuity to the department while the other systems are being developed and will thereby reduce overall disruptions within the working department. An image management system was installed in 1987. This system was initially independent from the RIS and patient demographic data needed to be entered into both systems when a study was performed. Between January 1987 and October 1988, we have worked with the commercial venders to integrate the RIS and PACS. This manuscript will discuss our early experience in integrating an RIS to an expanding PACS system2.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936147495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936147495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.953378

DO - 10.1117/12.953378

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84936147495

VL - 1093

SP - 589

EP - 596

JO - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

JF - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

SN - 0277-786X

ER -