Economic and utilization analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

M. Francesca Monn, Alec R. Gramm, Clinton Bahler, David Y. Yang, Chandru Sundaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Reports of robot-assisted live donor nephrectomies (LDNs) have been emerging in the literature. We sought to examine the national incidence of robot-assisted LDNs and to assess regional use and economic differences in robot-assisted versus laparoscopic LDN. Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were used to identify patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robot-assisted LDN between 2009 and 2011. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine differences between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups. Results: A total of 4,163 cases of LDN were performed using robot-assistance or pure laparoscopic surgery between 2009 and 2011. Of these, 142 were classified as robot-assisted nephrectomies; these cases were all from the western United States. There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups (P=0.206). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) total charges for robot-assisted LDN were $48,639 ($42,380-$53,050) vs $37,019 ($28,715-$48,816) for laparoscopic cases (P<0.001). Conclusions: The role of robotic assistance in LDN remains to be determined; we identified no benefits to robotic assistance in our study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)780-783
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2014

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Economics
Tissue Donors
Robotics
Incidence
Laparoscopy
Inpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Economic and utilization analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. / Monn, M. Francesca; Gramm, Alec R.; Bahler, Clinton; Yang, David Y.; Sundaram, Chandru.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 28, No. 7, 01.07.2014, p. 780-783.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c9b17cb83bc4c8aafd15efd93e14aee,
title = "Economic and utilization analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy",
abstract = "Background: Reports of robot-assisted live donor nephrectomies (LDNs) have been emerging in the literature. We sought to examine the national incidence of robot-assisted LDNs and to assess regional use and economic differences in robot-assisted versus laparoscopic LDN. Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were used to identify patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robot-assisted LDN between 2009 and 2011. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine differences between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups. Results: A total of 4,163 cases of LDN were performed using robot-assistance or pure laparoscopic surgery between 2009 and 2011. Of these, 142 were classified as robot-assisted nephrectomies; these cases were all from the western United States. There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups (P=0.206). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) total charges for robot-assisted LDN were $48,639 ($42,380-$53,050) vs $37,019 ($28,715-$48,816) for laparoscopic cases (P<0.001). Conclusions: The role of robotic assistance in LDN remains to be determined; we identified no benefits to robotic assistance in our study.",
author = "Monn, {M. Francesca} and Gramm, {Alec R.} and Clinton Bahler and Yang, {David Y.} and Chandru Sundaram",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2014.0014",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "780--783",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic and utilization analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

AU - Monn, M. Francesca

AU - Gramm, Alec R.

AU - Bahler, Clinton

AU - Yang, David Y.

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

PY - 2014/7/1

Y1 - 2014/7/1

N2 - Background: Reports of robot-assisted live donor nephrectomies (LDNs) have been emerging in the literature. We sought to examine the national incidence of robot-assisted LDNs and to assess regional use and economic differences in robot-assisted versus laparoscopic LDN. Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were used to identify patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robot-assisted LDN between 2009 and 2011. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine differences between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups. Results: A total of 4,163 cases of LDN were performed using robot-assistance or pure laparoscopic surgery between 2009 and 2011. Of these, 142 were classified as robot-assisted nephrectomies; these cases were all from the western United States. There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups (P=0.206). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) total charges for robot-assisted LDN were $48,639 ($42,380-$53,050) vs $37,019 ($28,715-$48,816) for laparoscopic cases (P<0.001). Conclusions: The role of robotic assistance in LDN remains to be determined; we identified no benefits to robotic assistance in our study.

AB - Background: Reports of robot-assisted live donor nephrectomies (LDNs) have been emerging in the literature. We sought to examine the national incidence of robot-assisted LDNs and to assess regional use and economic differences in robot-assisted versus laparoscopic LDN. Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were used to identify patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robot-assisted LDN between 2009 and 2011. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine differences between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups. Results: A total of 4,163 cases of LDN were performed using robot-assistance or pure laparoscopic surgery between 2009 and 2011. Of these, 142 were classified as robot-assisted nephrectomies; these cases were all from the western United States. There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups (P=0.206). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) total charges for robot-assisted LDN were $48,639 ($42,380-$53,050) vs $37,019 ($28,715-$48,816) for laparoscopic cases (P<0.001). Conclusions: The role of robotic assistance in LDN remains to be determined; we identified no benefits to robotic assistance in our study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903705452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903705452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2014.0014

DO - 10.1089/end.2014.0014

M3 - Article

C2 - 24484317

AN - SCOPUS:84903705452

VL - 28

SP - 780

EP - 783

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 7

ER -