Editorial: Water exchange vs. water immersion during colonoscope insertion

Douglas K. Rex

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Water exchange (water infusion with water removal primarily during insertion) and water immersion (water infusion with water removal during withdrawal) reduce patient discomfort during colonoscope insertion compared with air insufflation, and represent a major achievement in colonoscopy. Hsieh et al. found that water exchange, relative to water immersion, resulted in more painless insertions to the cecum and improved adenoma detection in the right colon. However, water exchange is also associated with better bowel cleansing and longer insertion and procedure times. These factors are not specific to water exchange, but could account for all or part of the better results with water exchange. Additional controlled investigation is needed to define the benefits of water exchange compared with water immersion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1401-1403
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume109
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 11 2014

Fingerprint

Colonoscopes
Immersion
Water
Insufflation
Cecum
Colonoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Editorial : Water exchange vs. water immersion during colonoscope insertion. / Rex, Douglas.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 109, No. 9, 11.09.2014, p. 1401-1403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c45b1b7128d4784a211237e17e8e8ca,
title = "Editorial: Water exchange vs. water immersion during colonoscope insertion",
abstract = "Water exchange (water infusion with water removal primarily during insertion) and water immersion (water infusion with water removal during withdrawal) reduce patient discomfort during colonoscope insertion compared with air insufflation, and represent a major achievement in colonoscopy. Hsieh et al. found that water exchange, relative to water immersion, resulted in more painless insertions to the cecum and improved adenoma detection in the right colon. However, water exchange is also associated with better bowel cleansing and longer insertion and procedure times. These factors are not specific to water exchange, but could account for all or part of the better results with water exchange. Additional controlled investigation is needed to define the benefits of water exchange compared with water immersion.",
author = "Rex, {Douglas K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1038/ajg.2014.235",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "1401--1403",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Editorial

T2 - Water exchange vs. water immersion during colonoscope insertion

AU - Rex, Douglas K.

PY - 2014/9/11

Y1 - 2014/9/11

N2 - Water exchange (water infusion with water removal primarily during insertion) and water immersion (water infusion with water removal during withdrawal) reduce patient discomfort during colonoscope insertion compared with air insufflation, and represent a major achievement in colonoscopy. Hsieh et al. found that water exchange, relative to water immersion, resulted in more painless insertions to the cecum and improved adenoma detection in the right colon. However, water exchange is also associated with better bowel cleansing and longer insertion and procedure times. These factors are not specific to water exchange, but could account for all or part of the better results with water exchange. Additional controlled investigation is needed to define the benefits of water exchange compared with water immersion.

AB - Water exchange (water infusion with water removal primarily during insertion) and water immersion (water infusion with water removal during withdrawal) reduce patient discomfort during colonoscope insertion compared with air insufflation, and represent a major achievement in colonoscopy. Hsieh et al. found that water exchange, relative to water immersion, resulted in more painless insertions to the cecum and improved adenoma detection in the right colon. However, water exchange is also associated with better bowel cleansing and longer insertion and procedure times. These factors are not specific to water exchange, but could account for all or part of the better results with water exchange. Additional controlled investigation is needed to define the benefits of water exchange compared with water immersion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908232236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908232236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ajg.2014.235

DO - 10.1038/ajg.2014.235

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25196871

AN - SCOPUS:84908232236

VL - 109

SP - 1401

EP - 1403

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 9

ER -