Effect of Accelerated Infliximab Induction on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

A Retrospective Multicenter Study and Meta-analysis

Niharika Nalagatla, Katherine Falloon, Gloria Tran, Nienke Z. Borren, Danny Avalos, Jay Luther, Francis Colizzo, John Garber, Hamed Khalili, Joanna Melia, Matthew Bohm, Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background & Aims: In patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), standard infliximab induction therapy has modest efficacy. There are limited data on the short-term or long-term efficacy of accelerated infliximab induction therapy for these patients. Methods: In a retrospective study, we collected data from 213 patients with steroid refractory ASUC who received infliximab rescue therapy at 3 centers, from 2005 through 2017. Patients were classified that received standard therapy (5mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6) or accelerated therapy (>5mg/kg infliximab at shorter intervals). The primary outcome was colectomy in-hospital and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Multivariable regression models were adjusted for relevant confounders. We also performed a meta-analysis of published effects of standard vs accelerated infliximab treatment of ASUC. Results: In the retrospective analysis, 81 patients received accelerated infliximab therapy and 132 received standard infliximab therapy. There were no differences in characteristics between the groups, including levels of C-reactive protein or albumin. Similar proportions of patients in each group underwent in-hospital colectomy (9% receiving accelerated therapy vs 8% receiving standard therapy; adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.38–4.82). There was no significant difference between groups in proportions that underwent colectomy at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months (P >.20 for all comparisons). Among those in the accelerated group, an initial dose of 10 mg/kg was associated with a lower rate of colectomy compared to patients who initially received 5 mg/kg followed by subsequent doses of 5mg/kg or higher. Our systematic review identified 7 studies (181 patients receiving accelerated infliximab and 436 receiving standard infliximab) and found no significant differences in short- or long-term outcomes. Conclusion: In a retrospective study and meta-analysis, we found no association between accelerated infliximab induction therapy and lower rates of colectomy in patients with ASUC, compared to standard induction therapy. However, confounding by disease severity cannot be excluded. Randomized trials are warranted to compare these treatment strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-509.e1
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Ulcerative Colitis
Multicenter Studies
Meta-Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Colectomy
Therapeutics
Infliximab
C-Reactive Protein
Albumins
Odds Ratio
Steroids

Keywords

  • Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis
  • Colectomy
  • Hospitalization
  • IBD Treatment
  • Infliximab
  • Multicenter
  • Patient Management
  • Surgery
  • TNF Antagonist

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Effect of Accelerated Infliximab Induction on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis : A Retrospective Multicenter Study and Meta-analysis. / Nalagatla, Niharika; Falloon, Katherine; Tran, Gloria; Borren, Nienke Z.; Avalos, Danny; Luther, Jay; Colizzo, Francis; Garber, John; Khalili, Hamed; Melia, Joanna; Bohm, Matthew; Ananthakrishnan, Ashwin N.

In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.02.2019, p. 502-509.e1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nalagatla, N, Falloon, K, Tran, G, Borren, NZ, Avalos, D, Luther, J, Colizzo, F, Garber, J, Khalili, H, Melia, J, Bohm, M & Ananthakrishnan, AN 2019, 'Effect of Accelerated Infliximab Induction on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study and Meta-analysis', Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 502-509.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.031
Nalagatla, Niharika ; Falloon, Katherine ; Tran, Gloria ; Borren, Nienke Z. ; Avalos, Danny ; Luther, Jay ; Colizzo, Francis ; Garber, John ; Khalili, Hamed ; Melia, Joanna ; Bohm, Matthew ; Ananthakrishnan, Ashwin N. / Effect of Accelerated Infliximab Induction on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis : A Retrospective Multicenter Study and Meta-analysis. In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 502-509.e1.
@article{59345ebc49784656a13c5b228f4bcd27,
title = "Effect of Accelerated Infliximab Induction on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study and Meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background & Aims: In patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), standard infliximab induction therapy has modest efficacy. There are limited data on the short-term or long-term efficacy of accelerated infliximab induction therapy for these patients. Methods: In a retrospective study, we collected data from 213 patients with steroid refractory ASUC who received infliximab rescue therapy at 3 centers, from 2005 through 2017. Patients were classified that received standard therapy (5mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6) or accelerated therapy (>5mg/kg infliximab at shorter intervals). The primary outcome was colectomy in-hospital and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Multivariable regression models were adjusted for relevant confounders. We also performed a meta-analysis of published effects of standard vs accelerated infliximab treatment of ASUC. Results: In the retrospective analysis, 81 patients received accelerated infliximab therapy and 132 received standard infliximab therapy. There were no differences in characteristics between the groups, including levels of C-reactive protein or albumin. Similar proportions of patients in each group underwent in-hospital colectomy (9{\%} receiving accelerated therapy vs 8{\%} receiving standard therapy; adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95{\%} CI, 0.38–4.82). There was no significant difference between groups in proportions that underwent colectomy at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months (P >.20 for all comparisons). Among those in the accelerated group, an initial dose of 10 mg/kg was associated with a lower rate of colectomy compared to patients who initially received 5 mg/kg followed by subsequent doses of 5mg/kg or higher. Our systematic review identified 7 studies (181 patients receiving accelerated infliximab and 436 receiving standard infliximab) and found no significant differences in short- or long-term outcomes. Conclusion: In a retrospective study and meta-analysis, we found no association between accelerated infliximab induction therapy and lower rates of colectomy in patients with ASUC, compared to standard induction therapy. However, confounding by disease severity cannot be excluded. Randomized trials are warranted to compare these treatment strategies.",
keywords = "Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis, Colectomy, Hospitalization, IBD Treatment, Infliximab, Multicenter, Patient Management, Surgery, TNF Antagonist",
author = "Niharika Nalagatla and Katherine Falloon and Gloria Tran and Borren, {Nienke Z.} and Danny Avalos and Jay Luther and Francis Colizzo and John Garber and Hamed Khalili and Joanna Melia and Matthew Bohm and Ananthakrishnan, {Ashwin N.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "502--509.e1",
journal = "Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "1542-3565",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Accelerated Infliximab Induction on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

T2 - A Retrospective Multicenter Study and Meta-analysis

AU - Nalagatla, Niharika

AU - Falloon, Katherine

AU - Tran, Gloria

AU - Borren, Nienke Z.

AU - Avalos, Danny

AU - Luther, Jay

AU - Colizzo, Francis

AU - Garber, John

AU - Khalili, Hamed

AU - Melia, Joanna

AU - Bohm, Matthew

AU - Ananthakrishnan, Ashwin N.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Background & Aims: In patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), standard infliximab induction therapy has modest efficacy. There are limited data on the short-term or long-term efficacy of accelerated infliximab induction therapy for these patients. Methods: In a retrospective study, we collected data from 213 patients with steroid refractory ASUC who received infliximab rescue therapy at 3 centers, from 2005 through 2017. Patients were classified that received standard therapy (5mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6) or accelerated therapy (>5mg/kg infliximab at shorter intervals). The primary outcome was colectomy in-hospital and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Multivariable regression models were adjusted for relevant confounders. We also performed a meta-analysis of published effects of standard vs accelerated infliximab treatment of ASUC. Results: In the retrospective analysis, 81 patients received accelerated infliximab therapy and 132 received standard infliximab therapy. There were no differences in characteristics between the groups, including levels of C-reactive protein or albumin. Similar proportions of patients in each group underwent in-hospital colectomy (9% receiving accelerated therapy vs 8% receiving standard therapy; adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.38–4.82). There was no significant difference between groups in proportions that underwent colectomy at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months (P >.20 for all comparisons). Among those in the accelerated group, an initial dose of 10 mg/kg was associated with a lower rate of colectomy compared to patients who initially received 5 mg/kg followed by subsequent doses of 5mg/kg or higher. Our systematic review identified 7 studies (181 patients receiving accelerated infliximab and 436 receiving standard infliximab) and found no significant differences in short- or long-term outcomes. Conclusion: In a retrospective study and meta-analysis, we found no association between accelerated infliximab induction therapy and lower rates of colectomy in patients with ASUC, compared to standard induction therapy. However, confounding by disease severity cannot be excluded. Randomized trials are warranted to compare these treatment strategies.

AB - Background & Aims: In patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), standard infliximab induction therapy has modest efficacy. There are limited data on the short-term or long-term efficacy of accelerated infliximab induction therapy for these patients. Methods: In a retrospective study, we collected data from 213 patients with steroid refractory ASUC who received infliximab rescue therapy at 3 centers, from 2005 through 2017. Patients were classified that received standard therapy (5mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6) or accelerated therapy (>5mg/kg infliximab at shorter intervals). The primary outcome was colectomy in-hospital and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Multivariable regression models were adjusted for relevant confounders. We also performed a meta-analysis of published effects of standard vs accelerated infliximab treatment of ASUC. Results: In the retrospective analysis, 81 patients received accelerated infliximab therapy and 132 received standard infliximab therapy. There were no differences in characteristics between the groups, including levels of C-reactive protein or albumin. Similar proportions of patients in each group underwent in-hospital colectomy (9% receiving accelerated therapy vs 8% receiving standard therapy; adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.38–4.82). There was no significant difference between groups in proportions that underwent colectomy at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months (P >.20 for all comparisons). Among those in the accelerated group, an initial dose of 10 mg/kg was associated with a lower rate of colectomy compared to patients who initially received 5 mg/kg followed by subsequent doses of 5mg/kg or higher. Our systematic review identified 7 studies (181 patients receiving accelerated infliximab and 436 receiving standard infliximab) and found no significant differences in short- or long-term outcomes. Conclusion: In a retrospective study and meta-analysis, we found no association between accelerated infliximab induction therapy and lower rates of colectomy in patients with ASUC, compared to standard induction therapy. However, confounding by disease severity cannot be excluded. Randomized trials are warranted to compare these treatment strategies.

KW - Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

KW - Colectomy

KW - Hospitalization

KW - IBD Treatment

KW - Infliximab

KW - Multicenter

KW - Patient Management

KW - Surgery

KW - TNF Antagonist

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060351845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060351845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.031

DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.031

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 502-509.e1

JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 1542-3565

IS - 3

ER -