Effect of an annual benefit limit on adult dental expenditure and utilization

A cross-sectional analysis

Gwendolyn C. Morrison, Kristin S. Hendrix, Gregory Arling, Emily Hancock, Anna M. Hus, Marc Rosenman, Nancy Swigonski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Despite widespread use of dental benefit limits in terms of the types of services provided, an annual maximum on claims, or both, there is a dearth of literature examining their impact on either cost to the insurer or health outcomes. This study uses a natural experiment to examine dental care utilization and expenditure changes following Indiana Medicaid's introduction of a $600 individual annual limit on adult dental expenditure in 2003. Methods: In a before and after comparison, we use two separate cross-sections of paid claims for 96+ percent of the Medicaid adult population. Paid claims were available as a per-member-per-year (PMPY) figure. Results: Between 2002 and 2007, the eligible population decreased 3 percent (from 323,209 to 313,623), yet the number of people receiving any dental services increased 60 percent and total Medicaid dental claims increased 18 percent (from $34.1 million to $40.1 million). In both years, those Dually (Medicare/Medicaid) Eligible had the largest percentage of members receiving services, about 75 percent, and the Disabled Adult group had the lowest percentage (5-8 percent), yet both populations are likely to have high dental need due to effects of chronic conditions and medications. Conclusions: The increase in the number and percentage of people receiving Diagnostic and Restorative care suggests that the expenditure limit's introduction did not impose a barrier to accessing basic dental services. However, among those receiving any service, PMPY claims fell by 37 percent and 31 percent among the Dually Eligible and Disabled Adults categories, respectively, suggesting that the benefit limit affected these generally high need populations most.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-326
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Public Health Dentistry
Volume72
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Health Expenditures
Tooth
Cross-Sectional Studies
Medicaid
Population
Insurance Carriers
Dental Care
Medicare
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

Keywords

  • benefit limits
  • cost containment
  • cost control
  • dental benefits
  • dental health services
  • economics
  • health policy
  • Medicaid
  • Medicaid claims
  • Medicaid policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Effect of an annual benefit limit on adult dental expenditure and utilization : A cross-sectional analysis. / Morrison, Gwendolyn C.; Hendrix, Kristin S.; Arling, Gregory; Hancock, Emily; Hus, Anna M.; Rosenman, Marc; Swigonski, Nancy.

In: Journal of Public Health Dentistry, Vol. 72, No. 4, 2012, p. 320-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d83eb68a1e649d7b725f84241d12bdf,
title = "Effect of an annual benefit limit on adult dental expenditure and utilization: A cross-sectional analysis",
abstract = "Objectives: Despite widespread use of dental benefit limits in terms of the types of services provided, an annual maximum on claims, or both, there is a dearth of literature examining their impact on either cost to the insurer or health outcomes. This study uses a natural experiment to examine dental care utilization and expenditure changes following Indiana Medicaid's introduction of a $600 individual annual limit on adult dental expenditure in 2003. Methods: In a before and after comparison, we use two separate cross-sections of paid claims for 96+ percent of the Medicaid adult population. Paid claims were available as a per-member-per-year (PMPY) figure. Results: Between 2002 and 2007, the eligible population decreased 3 percent (from 323,209 to 313,623), yet the number of people receiving any dental services increased 60 percent and total Medicaid dental claims increased 18 percent (from $34.1 million to $40.1 million). In both years, those Dually (Medicare/Medicaid) Eligible had the largest percentage of members receiving services, about 75 percent, and the Disabled Adult group had the lowest percentage (5-8 percent), yet both populations are likely to have high dental need due to effects of chronic conditions and medications. Conclusions: The increase in the number and percentage of people receiving Diagnostic and Restorative care suggests that the expenditure limit's introduction did not impose a barrier to accessing basic dental services. However, among those receiving any service, PMPY claims fell by 37 percent and 31 percent among the Dually Eligible and Disabled Adults categories, respectively, suggesting that the benefit limit affected these generally high need populations most.",
keywords = "benefit limits, cost containment, cost control, dental benefits, dental health services, economics, health policy, Medicaid, Medicaid claims, Medicaid policy",
author = "Morrison, {Gwendolyn C.} and Hendrix, {Kristin S.} and Gregory Arling and Emily Hancock and Hus, {Anna M.} and Marc Rosenman and Nancy Swigonski",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00341.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "320--326",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Dentistry",
issn = "0022-4006",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of an annual benefit limit on adult dental expenditure and utilization

T2 - A cross-sectional analysis

AU - Morrison, Gwendolyn C.

AU - Hendrix, Kristin S.

AU - Arling, Gregory

AU - Hancock, Emily

AU - Hus, Anna M.

AU - Rosenman, Marc

AU - Swigonski, Nancy

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objectives: Despite widespread use of dental benefit limits in terms of the types of services provided, an annual maximum on claims, or both, there is a dearth of literature examining their impact on either cost to the insurer or health outcomes. This study uses a natural experiment to examine dental care utilization and expenditure changes following Indiana Medicaid's introduction of a $600 individual annual limit on adult dental expenditure in 2003. Methods: In a before and after comparison, we use two separate cross-sections of paid claims for 96+ percent of the Medicaid adult population. Paid claims were available as a per-member-per-year (PMPY) figure. Results: Between 2002 and 2007, the eligible population decreased 3 percent (from 323,209 to 313,623), yet the number of people receiving any dental services increased 60 percent and total Medicaid dental claims increased 18 percent (from $34.1 million to $40.1 million). In both years, those Dually (Medicare/Medicaid) Eligible had the largest percentage of members receiving services, about 75 percent, and the Disabled Adult group had the lowest percentage (5-8 percent), yet both populations are likely to have high dental need due to effects of chronic conditions and medications. Conclusions: The increase in the number and percentage of people receiving Diagnostic and Restorative care suggests that the expenditure limit's introduction did not impose a barrier to accessing basic dental services. However, among those receiving any service, PMPY claims fell by 37 percent and 31 percent among the Dually Eligible and Disabled Adults categories, respectively, suggesting that the benefit limit affected these generally high need populations most.

AB - Objectives: Despite widespread use of dental benefit limits in terms of the types of services provided, an annual maximum on claims, or both, there is a dearth of literature examining their impact on either cost to the insurer or health outcomes. This study uses a natural experiment to examine dental care utilization and expenditure changes following Indiana Medicaid's introduction of a $600 individual annual limit on adult dental expenditure in 2003. Methods: In a before and after comparison, we use two separate cross-sections of paid claims for 96+ percent of the Medicaid adult population. Paid claims were available as a per-member-per-year (PMPY) figure. Results: Between 2002 and 2007, the eligible population decreased 3 percent (from 323,209 to 313,623), yet the number of people receiving any dental services increased 60 percent and total Medicaid dental claims increased 18 percent (from $34.1 million to $40.1 million). In both years, those Dually (Medicare/Medicaid) Eligible had the largest percentage of members receiving services, about 75 percent, and the Disabled Adult group had the lowest percentage (5-8 percent), yet both populations are likely to have high dental need due to effects of chronic conditions and medications. Conclusions: The increase in the number and percentage of people receiving Diagnostic and Restorative care suggests that the expenditure limit's introduction did not impose a barrier to accessing basic dental services. However, among those receiving any service, PMPY claims fell by 37 percent and 31 percent among the Dually Eligible and Disabled Adults categories, respectively, suggesting that the benefit limit affected these generally high need populations most.

KW - benefit limits

KW - cost containment

KW - cost control

KW - dental benefits

KW - dental health services

KW - economics

KW - health policy

KW - Medicaid

KW - Medicaid claims

KW - Medicaid policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027949442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027949442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00341.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00341.x

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 320

EP - 326

JO - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

JF - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

SN - 0022-4006

IS - 4

ER -