Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients

Douglas Rex

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and study aims: Variable-stiffness colonoscope allow passage of the rectosigmoid colon in a flexible model, followed by stiffening to prevent looping. This feature might allow faster cecal intubation. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients without previous colonic or rectal resection, inflammatory bowel disease, or anticipated need for either a pediatric or standard insertion tube were evaluated. Four Olympus colonoscopes, including a standard "adult" insertion-tube diameter variable-stiffness colonoscope (VSA), a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope (VSP), a standard "adult" colonoscope (CF-140) (SA), and a standard "pediatric" colonoscope (PCF-140) (SP) were used in rotation. Results: Among 358 consecutive patients, 99.2% of exams were complete to the cecum. The stiffening device was activated in 61% and 80% of the adult and pediatric variable-stiffness examinations, respectively. The examiner judged the device to be very useful, somewhat useful, and of no help in 46%, 44%, and 10% of VSA colonoscope examinations and 55%, 33%, and 12% of VSP colonoscope examinations. However, the mean cecal insertion time was 4.04 minutes, with no difference between the four colonoscopes (P = 0.98). The percentage of intubations in <2 minutes was 15.4%, 2-3 minutes 25.9%, 3-4 minutes 19.1% 4-5 minutes 16.0%, and > 5 minutes 23.7%, with no significant difference between the colonoscopes. Conclusions: Variable-stiffness colonoscopes were frequently judged useful by an experienced examiner but did not impact cecal intubation times in sedated patients. Additional studies by other experienced and inexperienced examiners, as well as evaluation of additional technical improvements and evaluation in unsedated patients, are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-64
Number of pages5
JournalEndoscopy
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Colonoscopes
Colonoscopy
Intubation
Pediatrics
Equipment and Supplies
Cecum
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients. / Rex, Douglas.

In: Endoscopy, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2001, p. 60-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{36af96e71c2c4436adcaf6fa3ac8296a,
title = "Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients",
abstract = "Background and study aims: Variable-stiffness colonoscope allow passage of the rectosigmoid colon in a flexible model, followed by stiffening to prevent looping. This feature might allow faster cecal intubation. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients without previous colonic or rectal resection, inflammatory bowel disease, or anticipated need for either a pediatric or standard insertion tube were evaluated. Four Olympus colonoscopes, including a standard {"}adult{"} insertion-tube diameter variable-stiffness colonoscope (VSA), a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope (VSP), a standard {"}adult{"} colonoscope (CF-140) (SA), and a standard {"}pediatric{"} colonoscope (PCF-140) (SP) were used in rotation. Results: Among 358 consecutive patients, 99.2{\%} of exams were complete to the cecum. The stiffening device was activated in 61{\%} and 80{\%} of the adult and pediatric variable-stiffness examinations, respectively. The examiner judged the device to be very useful, somewhat useful, and of no help in 46{\%}, 44{\%}, and 10{\%} of VSA colonoscope examinations and 55{\%}, 33{\%}, and 12{\%} of VSP colonoscope examinations. However, the mean cecal insertion time was 4.04 minutes, with no difference between the four colonoscopes (P = 0.98). The percentage of intubations in <2 minutes was 15.4{\%}, 2-3 minutes 25.9{\%}, 3-4 minutes 19.1{\%} 4-5 minutes 16.0{\%}, and > 5 minutes 23.7{\%}, with no significant difference between the colonoscopes. Conclusions: Variable-stiffness colonoscopes were frequently judged useful by an experienced examiner but did not impact cecal intubation times in sedated patients. Additional studies by other experienced and inexperienced examiners, as well as evaluation of additional technical improvements and evaluation in unsedated patients, are needed.",
author = "Douglas Rex",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1055/s-2001-11179",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "60--64",
journal = "Endoscopy",
issn = "0013-726X",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients

AU - Rex, Douglas

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Background and study aims: Variable-stiffness colonoscope allow passage of the rectosigmoid colon in a flexible model, followed by stiffening to prevent looping. This feature might allow faster cecal intubation. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients without previous colonic or rectal resection, inflammatory bowel disease, or anticipated need for either a pediatric or standard insertion tube were evaluated. Four Olympus colonoscopes, including a standard "adult" insertion-tube diameter variable-stiffness colonoscope (VSA), a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope (VSP), a standard "adult" colonoscope (CF-140) (SA), and a standard "pediatric" colonoscope (PCF-140) (SP) were used in rotation. Results: Among 358 consecutive patients, 99.2% of exams were complete to the cecum. The stiffening device was activated in 61% and 80% of the adult and pediatric variable-stiffness examinations, respectively. The examiner judged the device to be very useful, somewhat useful, and of no help in 46%, 44%, and 10% of VSA colonoscope examinations and 55%, 33%, and 12% of VSP colonoscope examinations. However, the mean cecal insertion time was 4.04 minutes, with no difference between the four colonoscopes (P = 0.98). The percentage of intubations in <2 minutes was 15.4%, 2-3 minutes 25.9%, 3-4 minutes 19.1% 4-5 minutes 16.0%, and > 5 minutes 23.7%, with no significant difference between the colonoscopes. Conclusions: Variable-stiffness colonoscopes were frequently judged useful by an experienced examiner but did not impact cecal intubation times in sedated patients. Additional studies by other experienced and inexperienced examiners, as well as evaluation of additional technical improvements and evaluation in unsedated patients, are needed.

AB - Background and study aims: Variable-stiffness colonoscope allow passage of the rectosigmoid colon in a flexible model, followed by stiffening to prevent looping. This feature might allow faster cecal intubation. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients without previous colonic or rectal resection, inflammatory bowel disease, or anticipated need for either a pediatric or standard insertion tube were evaluated. Four Olympus colonoscopes, including a standard "adult" insertion-tube diameter variable-stiffness colonoscope (VSA), a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope (VSP), a standard "adult" colonoscope (CF-140) (SA), and a standard "pediatric" colonoscope (PCF-140) (SP) were used in rotation. Results: Among 358 consecutive patients, 99.2% of exams were complete to the cecum. The stiffening device was activated in 61% and 80% of the adult and pediatric variable-stiffness examinations, respectively. The examiner judged the device to be very useful, somewhat useful, and of no help in 46%, 44%, and 10% of VSA colonoscope examinations and 55%, 33%, and 12% of VSP colonoscope examinations. However, the mean cecal insertion time was 4.04 minutes, with no difference between the four colonoscopes (P = 0.98). The percentage of intubations in <2 minutes was 15.4%, 2-3 minutes 25.9%, 3-4 minutes 19.1% 4-5 minutes 16.0%, and > 5 minutes 23.7%, with no significant difference between the colonoscopes. Conclusions: Variable-stiffness colonoscopes were frequently judged useful by an experienced examiner but did not impact cecal intubation times in sedated patients. Additional studies by other experienced and inexperienced examiners, as well as evaluation of additional technical improvements and evaluation in unsedated patients, are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034948809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034948809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-2001-11179

DO - 10.1055/s-2001-11179

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 60

EP - 64

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

SN - 0013-726X

IS - 1

ER -