Effectiveness of implementing a wake up and Breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICU

Babar Khan, William F. Fadel, Jason L. Tricker, William Carlos, Mark O. Farber, Siu Hui, Noll L. Campbell, E. Wesley Ely, Malaz Boustani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Mechanically ventilated critically ill patients receive significant amounts of sedatives and analgesics that increase their risk of developing coma and delirium. We evaluated the impact of a "Wake-up and Breathe Protocol" at our local ICU on sedation and delirium. Design: A pre/post implementation study design. Setting: A 22-bed mixed surgical and medical ICU. Patients: Seven hundred two consecutive mechanically ventilated ICU patients from June 2010 to January 2013. Interventions: Implementation of daily paired spontaneous awakening trials (daily sedation vacation plus spontaneous breathing trials) as a quality improvement project. Measurements and Main Results: After implementation of our program, there was an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekdays of 0.88 (p < 0.0001) and an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekends of 1.21 (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, race, gender, severity of illness, primary diagnosis, and ICU, the incidence and prevalence of delirium did not change post implementation of the protocol (incidence: 23% pre vs 19.6% post; p = 0.40; prevalence: 66.7% pre vs 55.3% post; p = 0.06). The combined prevalence of delirium/coma decreased from 90.8% pre protocol implementation to 85% postimplementation (odds ratio, 0.505; 95% CI, 0.299-0.853; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Implementing a "Wake Up and Breathe Program" resulted in reduced sedation among critically ill mechanically ventilated patients but did not change the incidence or prevalence of delirium.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e791-e795
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume42
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Delirium
Coma
Critical Illness
Incidence
Quality Improvement
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Analgesics
Respiration
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • Acute brain dysfunction
  • Delirium
  • Intensive care unit
  • Quality improvement
  • Sedation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Effectiveness of implementing a wake up and Breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICU. / Khan, Babar; Fadel, William F.; Tricker, Jason L.; Carlos, William; Farber, Mark O.; Hui, Siu; Campbell, Noll L.; Ely, E. Wesley; Boustani, Malaz.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 42, No. 12, 2014, p. e791-e795.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khan, Babar ; Fadel, William F. ; Tricker, Jason L. ; Carlos, William ; Farber, Mark O. ; Hui, Siu ; Campbell, Noll L. ; Ely, E. Wesley ; Boustani, Malaz. / Effectiveness of implementing a wake up and Breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICU. In: Critical Care Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 12. pp. e791-e795.
@article{cdf29609772c44c5b2226ac5ef6ee1e3,
title = "Effectiveness of implementing a wake up and Breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICU",
abstract = "Objectives: Mechanically ventilated critically ill patients receive significant amounts of sedatives and analgesics that increase their risk of developing coma and delirium. We evaluated the impact of a {"}Wake-up and Breathe Protocol{"} at our local ICU on sedation and delirium. Design: A pre/post implementation study design. Setting: A 22-bed mixed surgical and medical ICU. Patients: Seven hundred two consecutive mechanically ventilated ICU patients from June 2010 to January 2013. Interventions: Implementation of daily paired spontaneous awakening trials (daily sedation vacation plus spontaneous breathing trials) as a quality improvement project. Measurements and Main Results: After implementation of our program, there was an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekdays of 0.88 (p < 0.0001) and an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekends of 1.21 (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, race, gender, severity of illness, primary diagnosis, and ICU, the incidence and prevalence of delirium did not change post implementation of the protocol (incidence: 23{\%} pre vs 19.6{\%} post; p = 0.40; prevalence: 66.7{\%} pre vs 55.3{\%} post; p = 0.06). The combined prevalence of delirium/coma decreased from 90.8{\%} pre protocol implementation to 85{\%} postimplementation (odds ratio, 0.505; 95{\%} CI, 0.299-0.853; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Implementing a {"}Wake Up and Breathe Program{"} resulted in reduced sedation among critically ill mechanically ventilated patients but did not change the incidence or prevalence of delirium.",
keywords = "Acute brain dysfunction, Delirium, Intensive care unit, Quality improvement, Sedation",
author = "Babar Khan and Fadel, {William F.} and Tricker, {Jason L.} and William Carlos and Farber, {Mark O.} and Siu Hui and Campbell, {Noll L.} and Ely, {E. Wesley} and Malaz Boustani",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000000660",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "e791--e795",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of implementing a wake up and Breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICU

AU - Khan, Babar

AU - Fadel, William F.

AU - Tricker, Jason L.

AU - Carlos, William

AU - Farber, Mark O.

AU - Hui, Siu

AU - Campbell, Noll L.

AU - Ely, E. Wesley

AU - Boustani, Malaz

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: Mechanically ventilated critically ill patients receive significant amounts of sedatives and analgesics that increase their risk of developing coma and delirium. We evaluated the impact of a "Wake-up and Breathe Protocol" at our local ICU on sedation and delirium. Design: A pre/post implementation study design. Setting: A 22-bed mixed surgical and medical ICU. Patients: Seven hundred two consecutive mechanically ventilated ICU patients from June 2010 to January 2013. Interventions: Implementation of daily paired spontaneous awakening trials (daily sedation vacation plus spontaneous breathing trials) as a quality improvement project. Measurements and Main Results: After implementation of our program, there was an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekdays of 0.88 (p < 0.0001) and an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekends of 1.21 (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, race, gender, severity of illness, primary diagnosis, and ICU, the incidence and prevalence of delirium did not change post implementation of the protocol (incidence: 23% pre vs 19.6% post; p = 0.40; prevalence: 66.7% pre vs 55.3% post; p = 0.06). The combined prevalence of delirium/coma decreased from 90.8% pre protocol implementation to 85% postimplementation (odds ratio, 0.505; 95% CI, 0.299-0.853; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Implementing a "Wake Up and Breathe Program" resulted in reduced sedation among critically ill mechanically ventilated patients but did not change the incidence or prevalence of delirium.

AB - Objectives: Mechanically ventilated critically ill patients receive significant amounts of sedatives and analgesics that increase their risk of developing coma and delirium. We evaluated the impact of a "Wake-up and Breathe Protocol" at our local ICU on sedation and delirium. Design: A pre/post implementation study design. Setting: A 22-bed mixed surgical and medical ICU. Patients: Seven hundred two consecutive mechanically ventilated ICU patients from June 2010 to January 2013. Interventions: Implementation of daily paired spontaneous awakening trials (daily sedation vacation plus spontaneous breathing trials) as a quality improvement project. Measurements and Main Results: After implementation of our program, there was an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekdays of 0.88 (p < 0.0001) and an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekends of 1.21 (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, race, gender, severity of illness, primary diagnosis, and ICU, the incidence and prevalence of delirium did not change post implementation of the protocol (incidence: 23% pre vs 19.6% post; p = 0.40; prevalence: 66.7% pre vs 55.3% post; p = 0.06). The combined prevalence of delirium/coma decreased from 90.8% pre protocol implementation to 85% postimplementation (odds ratio, 0.505; 95% CI, 0.299-0.853; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Implementing a "Wake Up and Breathe Program" resulted in reduced sedation among critically ill mechanically ventilated patients but did not change the incidence or prevalence of delirium.

KW - Acute brain dysfunction

KW - Delirium

KW - Intensive care unit

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Sedation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927734749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927734749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000660

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000660

M3 - Article

C2 - 25402299

AN - SCOPUS:84927734749

VL - 42

SP - e791-e795

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 12

ER -