Effects of fluoxetine and desipramine on palatability-induced ethanol consumption in the alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) line of rats

G. J. Gatto, J. M. Murphy, W. J. McBride, L. Lumeng, T. K. Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three groups of NP rats (n = 5/group) received food, water and one of 3 Polycose solutions ad lib. One group received a solution containing 3% (w/v) Polycose, 0.125% (w/v) saccharin, 0.5% (w/v) NaCl (3% POL solution) to which ethanol was gradually added over three weeks until the concentration of 10% (v/v) ethanol (E) was reached (3% POL + E group). Alcohol ingestion by the 3% POL + E group reached an average of 9 g of ethanol/kg b.wt./day; the rats attained average blood alcohol concentrations of 61 ± 8 mg%. One control group (3% POL) was given the same solution as above but without ethanol. The second control group (17% POL) had access to a 17.6% Polycose solution supplemented with 0.125% saccharin and 0.5% NaCl and was isocaloric to the 3% POL + E solution. Although the three groups differed significantly in the amounts of food and Polycose solutions consumed, their total caloric intakes were equivalent. The IP administration of the serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitor fluoxetine (5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced drinking of the group receiving the 3% POL + E solution by 23% and 67%, respectively, but did not alter intakes of the Polycose solutions by the 3% or 17% POL control groups. The IP administration of the norepinephrine (NE) uptake inhibitor desipramine (5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced intake of the Polycose solution by the 17% POL group by 52 and 83%, respectively, but only the 10 mg/kg dose attenuated drinking of the solutions by the 3% POL and 3% POL + E groups. Both fluoxetine and desipramine decreased food intake of the 3% POL and 3% POL + E groups, while only desipramine suppressed food intake of the 17% POL rats. The data show that (a) NP rats can be induced to drink pharmacologically relevant amounts of ethanol when offered in a palatable solution, (b) fluoxetine preferentially reduces ethanol intake by NP rats through its actions on 5-HT systems that presumably mediate the aversive properties of ethanol, and (c) a carbohydrate-rich diet appears to alter the anorectic actions of NE and 5-HT uptake inhibitors in the NP rat.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-536
Number of pages6
JournalAlcohol
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Desipramine
Fluoxetine
Alcohol Drinking
Rats
Ethanol
alcohol
Alcohols
Glucans
Group
Saccharin
food
Eating
Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors
Control Groups
Drinking
Serotonin
Norepinephrine
Food
Appetite Depressants
Nutrition

Keywords

  • Alcohol-nonpreferring NP rats
  • Desipramine
  • Fluoxetine
  • Food intake
  • Palatability-induced ethanol drinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Medicine(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Toxicology
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Effects of fluoxetine and desipramine on palatability-induced ethanol consumption in the alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) line of rats. / Gatto, G. J.; Murphy, J. M.; McBride, W. J.; Lumeng, L.; Li, T. K.

In: Alcohol, Vol. 7, No. 6, 01.01.1990, p. 531-536.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gatto, G. J. ; Murphy, J. M. ; McBride, W. J. ; Lumeng, L. ; Li, T. K. / Effects of fluoxetine and desipramine on palatability-induced ethanol consumption in the alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) line of rats. In: Alcohol. 1990 ; Vol. 7, No. 6. pp. 531-536.
@article{9bac18d74d1b4d57a77eeeac2c761567,
title = "Effects of fluoxetine and desipramine on palatability-induced ethanol consumption in the alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) line of rats",
abstract = "Three groups of NP rats (n = 5/group) received food, water and one of 3 Polycose solutions ad lib. One group received a solution containing 3{\%} (w/v) Polycose, 0.125{\%} (w/v) saccharin, 0.5{\%} (w/v) NaCl (3{\%} POL solution) to which ethanol was gradually added over three weeks until the concentration of 10{\%} (v/v) ethanol (E) was reached (3{\%} POL + E group). Alcohol ingestion by the 3{\%} POL + E group reached an average of 9 g of ethanol/kg b.wt./day; the rats attained average blood alcohol concentrations of 61 ± 8 mg{\%}. One control group (3{\%} POL) was given the same solution as above but without ethanol. The second control group (17{\%} POL) had access to a 17.6{\%} Polycose solution supplemented with 0.125{\%} saccharin and 0.5{\%} NaCl and was isocaloric to the 3{\%} POL + E solution. Although the three groups differed significantly in the amounts of food and Polycose solutions consumed, their total caloric intakes were equivalent. The IP administration of the serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitor fluoxetine (5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced drinking of the group receiving the 3{\%} POL + E solution by 23{\%} and 67{\%}, respectively, but did not alter intakes of the Polycose solutions by the 3{\%} or 17{\%} POL control groups. The IP administration of the norepinephrine (NE) uptake inhibitor desipramine (5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced intake of the Polycose solution by the 17{\%} POL group by 52 and 83{\%}, respectively, but only the 10 mg/kg dose attenuated drinking of the solutions by the 3{\%} POL and 3{\%} POL + E groups. Both fluoxetine and desipramine decreased food intake of the 3{\%} POL and 3{\%} POL + E groups, while only desipramine suppressed food intake of the 17{\%} POL rats. The data show that (a) NP rats can be induced to drink pharmacologically relevant amounts of ethanol when offered in a palatable solution, (b) fluoxetine preferentially reduces ethanol intake by NP rats through its actions on 5-HT systems that presumably mediate the aversive properties of ethanol, and (c) a carbohydrate-rich diet appears to alter the anorectic actions of NE and 5-HT uptake inhibitors in the NP rat.",
keywords = "Alcohol-nonpreferring NP rats, Desipramine, Fluoxetine, Food intake, Palatability-induced ethanol drinking",
author = "Gatto, {G. J.} and Murphy, {J. M.} and McBride, {W. J.} and L. Lumeng and Li, {T. K.}",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0741-8329(90)90044-D",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "531--536",
journal = "Alcohol",
issn = "0741-8329",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of fluoxetine and desipramine on palatability-induced ethanol consumption in the alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) line of rats

AU - Gatto, G. J.

AU - Murphy, J. M.

AU - McBride, W. J.

AU - Lumeng, L.

AU - Li, T. K.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - Three groups of NP rats (n = 5/group) received food, water and one of 3 Polycose solutions ad lib. One group received a solution containing 3% (w/v) Polycose, 0.125% (w/v) saccharin, 0.5% (w/v) NaCl (3% POL solution) to which ethanol was gradually added over three weeks until the concentration of 10% (v/v) ethanol (E) was reached (3% POL + E group). Alcohol ingestion by the 3% POL + E group reached an average of 9 g of ethanol/kg b.wt./day; the rats attained average blood alcohol concentrations of 61 ± 8 mg%. One control group (3% POL) was given the same solution as above but without ethanol. The second control group (17% POL) had access to a 17.6% Polycose solution supplemented with 0.125% saccharin and 0.5% NaCl and was isocaloric to the 3% POL + E solution. Although the three groups differed significantly in the amounts of food and Polycose solutions consumed, their total caloric intakes were equivalent. The IP administration of the serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitor fluoxetine (5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced drinking of the group receiving the 3% POL + E solution by 23% and 67%, respectively, but did not alter intakes of the Polycose solutions by the 3% or 17% POL control groups. The IP administration of the norepinephrine (NE) uptake inhibitor desipramine (5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced intake of the Polycose solution by the 17% POL group by 52 and 83%, respectively, but only the 10 mg/kg dose attenuated drinking of the solutions by the 3% POL and 3% POL + E groups. Both fluoxetine and desipramine decreased food intake of the 3% POL and 3% POL + E groups, while only desipramine suppressed food intake of the 17% POL rats. The data show that (a) NP rats can be induced to drink pharmacologically relevant amounts of ethanol when offered in a palatable solution, (b) fluoxetine preferentially reduces ethanol intake by NP rats through its actions on 5-HT systems that presumably mediate the aversive properties of ethanol, and (c) a carbohydrate-rich diet appears to alter the anorectic actions of NE and 5-HT uptake inhibitors in the NP rat.

AB - Three groups of NP rats (n = 5/group) received food, water and one of 3 Polycose solutions ad lib. One group received a solution containing 3% (w/v) Polycose, 0.125% (w/v) saccharin, 0.5% (w/v) NaCl (3% POL solution) to which ethanol was gradually added over three weeks until the concentration of 10% (v/v) ethanol (E) was reached (3% POL + E group). Alcohol ingestion by the 3% POL + E group reached an average of 9 g of ethanol/kg b.wt./day; the rats attained average blood alcohol concentrations of 61 ± 8 mg%. One control group (3% POL) was given the same solution as above but without ethanol. The second control group (17% POL) had access to a 17.6% Polycose solution supplemented with 0.125% saccharin and 0.5% NaCl and was isocaloric to the 3% POL + E solution. Although the three groups differed significantly in the amounts of food and Polycose solutions consumed, their total caloric intakes were equivalent. The IP administration of the serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitor fluoxetine (5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced drinking of the group receiving the 3% POL + E solution by 23% and 67%, respectively, but did not alter intakes of the Polycose solutions by the 3% or 17% POL control groups. The IP administration of the norepinephrine (NE) uptake inhibitor desipramine (5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced intake of the Polycose solution by the 17% POL group by 52 and 83%, respectively, but only the 10 mg/kg dose attenuated drinking of the solutions by the 3% POL and 3% POL + E groups. Both fluoxetine and desipramine decreased food intake of the 3% POL and 3% POL + E groups, while only desipramine suppressed food intake of the 17% POL rats. The data show that (a) NP rats can be induced to drink pharmacologically relevant amounts of ethanol when offered in a palatable solution, (b) fluoxetine preferentially reduces ethanol intake by NP rats through its actions on 5-HT systems that presumably mediate the aversive properties of ethanol, and (c) a carbohydrate-rich diet appears to alter the anorectic actions of NE and 5-HT uptake inhibitors in the NP rat.

KW - Alcohol-nonpreferring NP rats

KW - Desipramine

KW - Fluoxetine

KW - Food intake

KW - Palatability-induced ethanol drinking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025016463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025016463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0741-8329(90)90044-D

DO - 10.1016/0741-8329(90)90044-D

M3 - Article

C2 - 2261092

AN - SCOPUS:0025016463

VL - 7

SP - 531

EP - 536

JO - Alcohol

JF - Alcohol

SN - 0741-8329

IS - 6

ER -