Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition

Cynthia G. Clopper, David B. Pisoni, Adam T. Tierney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Closed-set tests of spoken word recognition are frequently used in clinical settings to assess the speech discrimination skills of hearing-impaired listeners, particularly children. Speech scientists have reported robust effects of lexical competition and talker variability in open-set tasks but not closed-set tasks, suggesting that closed-set tests of spoken word recognition may not be valid assessments of speech recognition skills. The goal of the current study was to explore some of the task demands that might account for this fundamental difference between open-set and closed-set tasks. In a series of four experiments, we manipulated the number and nature of the response alternatives. Results revealed that as more highly confusable foils were added to the response alternatives, lexical competition and talker variability effects emerged in closed-set tests of spoken word recognition. These results demonstrate a close coupling between task demands and lexical competition effects in lexical access and spoken word recognition processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-349
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

Speech Perception
Hearing
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Lexical competition
  • Spoken word recognition
  • Talker variability
  • Task demands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition. / Clopper, Cynthia G.; Pisoni, David B.; Tierney, Adam T.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.12.2006, p. 331-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70fd574657904961abbbcfcfc2148b9b,
title = "Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition",
abstract = "Closed-set tests of spoken word recognition are frequently used in clinical settings to assess the speech discrimination skills of hearing-impaired listeners, particularly children. Speech scientists have reported robust effects of lexical competition and talker variability in open-set tasks but not closed-set tasks, suggesting that closed-set tests of spoken word recognition may not be valid assessments of speech recognition skills. The goal of the current study was to explore some of the task demands that might account for this fundamental difference between open-set and closed-set tasks. In a series of four experiments, we manipulated the number and nature of the response alternatives. Results revealed that as more highly confusable foils were added to the response alternatives, lexical competition and talker variability effects emerged in closed-set tests of spoken word recognition. These results demonstrate a close coupling between task demands and lexical competition effects in lexical access and spoken word recognition processes.",
keywords = "Lexical competition, Spoken word recognition, Talker variability, Task demands",
author = "Clopper, {Cynthia G.} and Pisoni, {David B.} and Tierney, {Adam T.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3766/jaaa.17.5.4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "331--349",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Audiology",
issn = "1050-0545",
publisher = "American Academy of Audiology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition

AU - Clopper, Cynthia G.

AU - Pisoni, David B.

AU - Tierney, Adam T.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Closed-set tests of spoken word recognition are frequently used in clinical settings to assess the speech discrimination skills of hearing-impaired listeners, particularly children. Speech scientists have reported robust effects of lexical competition and talker variability in open-set tasks but not closed-set tasks, suggesting that closed-set tests of spoken word recognition may not be valid assessments of speech recognition skills. The goal of the current study was to explore some of the task demands that might account for this fundamental difference between open-set and closed-set tasks. In a series of four experiments, we manipulated the number and nature of the response alternatives. Results revealed that as more highly confusable foils were added to the response alternatives, lexical competition and talker variability effects emerged in closed-set tests of spoken word recognition. These results demonstrate a close coupling between task demands and lexical competition effects in lexical access and spoken word recognition processes.

AB - Closed-set tests of spoken word recognition are frequently used in clinical settings to assess the speech discrimination skills of hearing-impaired listeners, particularly children. Speech scientists have reported robust effects of lexical competition and talker variability in open-set tasks but not closed-set tasks, suggesting that closed-set tests of spoken word recognition may not be valid assessments of speech recognition skills. The goal of the current study was to explore some of the task demands that might account for this fundamental difference between open-set and closed-set tasks. In a series of four experiments, we manipulated the number and nature of the response alternatives. Results revealed that as more highly confusable foils were added to the response alternatives, lexical competition and talker variability effects emerged in closed-set tests of spoken word recognition. These results demonstrate a close coupling between task demands and lexical competition effects in lexical access and spoken word recognition processes.

KW - Lexical competition

KW - Spoken word recognition

KW - Talker variability

KW - Task demands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750634296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750634296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3766/jaaa.17.5.4

DO - 10.3766/jaaa.17.5.4

M3 - Article

C2 - 16796300

AN - SCOPUS:33750634296

VL - 17

SP - 331

EP - 349

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

SN - 1050-0545

IS - 5

ER -