Efficiency and cost-effectiveness of field follow-up for patients with chlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic

Barry Katz, C. Scott Danos, Timothy S. Quinn, Virginia Caine, Robert B. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Unlike contact-tracing procedures for syphilis and gonorrhea, field follow-up to locate and treat patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infections has not been extensively applied in the United States. We implemented two studies to assess the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of using field follow-up for contact of two groups: patients with chlamydial infection detected as part of a screening program and women who were sexual partners of men with nongonococcal urethritis (NGU). Of the 142 patients with chlamydial infection who had not been treated empirically, 112 (79%) returned for treatment when a reminder system was used, as compared with a return rate of 97% (259/266) achieved by field follow-up (P < 0.0001). Among the 678 men with NGU enrolled in a randomized trial of field follow-up vs. two self-referral methods, field follow-up yielded over three times as many partners returning to the clinic for treatment as did either of the other two methods (P < 0.001). Analyses using the estimated costs of the intervention strategies and the medical costs associated with an untreated chlamydial infection showed that field follow-up by trained investigators proved to be not only the most efficient method for locating patients with chlamydial infection and/or patients who were at risk for it, but also the most cost-effective in terms of total health-care dollars spent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-16
Number of pages6
JournalSexually Transmitted Diseases
Volume15
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1988

Fingerprint

Chlamydia Infections
Chlamydia trachomatis
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Urethritis
Infection
Costs and Cost Analysis
Reminder Systems
Contact Tracing
Gonorrhea
Sexual Partners
Syphilis
Referral and Consultation
Research Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Efficiency and cost-effectiveness of field follow-up for patients with chlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic. / Katz, Barry; Scott Danos, C.; Quinn, Timothy S.; Caine, Virginia; Jones, Robert B.

In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1988, p. 11-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b75f917a345f4c65a61193704437f5e9,
title = "Efficiency and cost-effectiveness of field follow-up for patients with chlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic",
abstract = "Unlike contact-tracing procedures for syphilis and gonorrhea, field follow-up to locate and treat patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infections has not been extensively applied in the United States. We implemented two studies to assess the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of using field follow-up for contact of two groups: patients with chlamydial infection detected as part of a screening program and women who were sexual partners of men with nongonococcal urethritis (NGU). Of the 142 patients with chlamydial infection who had not been treated empirically, 112 (79{\%}) returned for treatment when a reminder system was used, as compared with a return rate of 97{\%} (259/266) achieved by field follow-up (P < 0.0001). Among the 678 men with NGU enrolled in a randomized trial of field follow-up vs. two self-referral methods, field follow-up yielded over three times as many partners returning to the clinic for treatment as did either of the other two methods (P < 0.001). Analyses using the estimated costs of the intervention strategies and the medical costs associated with an untreated chlamydial infection showed that field follow-up by trained investigators proved to be not only the most efficient method for locating patients with chlamydial infection and/or patients who were at risk for it, but also the most cost-effective in terms of total health-care dollars spent.",
author = "Barry Katz and {Scott Danos}, C. and Quinn, {Timothy S.} and Virginia Caine and Jones, {Robert B.}",
year = "1988",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "11--16",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Diseases",
issn = "0148-5717",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficiency and cost-effectiveness of field follow-up for patients with chlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic

AU - Katz, Barry

AU - Scott Danos, C.

AU - Quinn, Timothy S.

AU - Caine, Virginia

AU - Jones, Robert B.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Unlike contact-tracing procedures for syphilis and gonorrhea, field follow-up to locate and treat patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infections has not been extensively applied in the United States. We implemented two studies to assess the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of using field follow-up for contact of two groups: patients with chlamydial infection detected as part of a screening program and women who were sexual partners of men with nongonococcal urethritis (NGU). Of the 142 patients with chlamydial infection who had not been treated empirically, 112 (79%) returned for treatment when a reminder system was used, as compared with a return rate of 97% (259/266) achieved by field follow-up (P < 0.0001). Among the 678 men with NGU enrolled in a randomized trial of field follow-up vs. two self-referral methods, field follow-up yielded over three times as many partners returning to the clinic for treatment as did either of the other two methods (P < 0.001). Analyses using the estimated costs of the intervention strategies and the medical costs associated with an untreated chlamydial infection showed that field follow-up by trained investigators proved to be not only the most efficient method for locating patients with chlamydial infection and/or patients who were at risk for it, but also the most cost-effective in terms of total health-care dollars spent.

AB - Unlike contact-tracing procedures for syphilis and gonorrhea, field follow-up to locate and treat patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infections has not been extensively applied in the United States. We implemented two studies to assess the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of using field follow-up for contact of two groups: patients with chlamydial infection detected as part of a screening program and women who were sexual partners of men with nongonococcal urethritis (NGU). Of the 142 patients with chlamydial infection who had not been treated empirically, 112 (79%) returned for treatment when a reminder system was used, as compared with a return rate of 97% (259/266) achieved by field follow-up (P < 0.0001). Among the 678 men with NGU enrolled in a randomized trial of field follow-up vs. two self-referral methods, field follow-up yielded over three times as many partners returning to the clinic for treatment as did either of the other two methods (P < 0.001). Analyses using the estimated costs of the intervention strategies and the medical costs associated with an untreated chlamydial infection showed that field follow-up by trained investigators proved to be not only the most efficient method for locating patients with chlamydial infection and/or patients who were at risk for it, but also the most cost-effective in terms of total health-care dollars spent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023887041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023887041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3358237

AN - SCOPUS:0023887041

VL - 15

SP - 11

EP - 16

JO - Sexually Transmitted Diseases

JF - Sexually Transmitted Diseases

SN - 0148-5717

IS - 1

ER -