Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant subjects

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A series of experiments was performed to study electrically evoked potentials as indicators of subject response to cochlear implantation. 1. Brain stem evoked responses to electrical stimulation were compared to those obtained by acoustic stimulation in guinen pigs. Tlie response pattern was similar and was independent of the site of placement of the stimulus electrode (cochlear base or apex) or of the extracochlcnr ground electrode (eustachian tube or temporalis muscle) when evoked electrically. 2. Electrically evoked middle latency responses were recorded and compared to subjective behavioral thresholds in patients who had received a single channel cochlear implant (House-Urban). The behavioral responses to the same stimuli were similar. 3. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses were studied in single channel cochlear implant subjects (3M/House). When evoked electrically, potential latencies were shorter and in- Lerpcak intervals narrower than acoustically evoked potentials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-185
Number of pages8
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume96
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Evoked Potentials
Electrodes
Eustachian Tube
Cochlear Implantation
Acoustic Stimulation
Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Cochlea
Electric Stimulation
Brain Stem
Reaction Time
Swine
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant subjects. / Miyamoto, Richard.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 96, No. 2, 1986, p. 178-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d8dd9ac0522d4c5daa5eb3b8fdbd3a43,
title = "Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant subjects",
abstract = "A series of experiments was performed to study electrically evoked potentials as indicators of subject response to cochlear implantation. 1. Brain stem evoked responses to electrical stimulation were compared to those obtained by acoustic stimulation in guinen pigs. Tlie response pattern was similar and was independent of the site of placement of the stimulus electrode (cochlear base or apex) or of the extracochlcnr ground electrode (eustachian tube or temporalis muscle) when evoked electrically. 2. Electrically evoked middle latency responses were recorded and compared to subjective behavioral thresholds in patients who had received a single channel cochlear implant (House-Urban). The behavioral responses to the same stimuli were similar. 3. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses were studied in single channel cochlear implant subjects (3M/House). When evoked electrically, potential latencies were shorter and in- Lerpcak intervals narrower than acoustically evoked potentials.",
author = "Richard Miyamoto",
year = "1986",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "178--185",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant subjects

AU - Miyamoto, Richard

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - A series of experiments was performed to study electrically evoked potentials as indicators of subject response to cochlear implantation. 1. Brain stem evoked responses to electrical stimulation were compared to those obtained by acoustic stimulation in guinen pigs. Tlie response pattern was similar and was independent of the site of placement of the stimulus electrode (cochlear base or apex) or of the extracochlcnr ground electrode (eustachian tube or temporalis muscle) when evoked electrically. 2. Electrically evoked middle latency responses were recorded and compared to subjective behavioral thresholds in patients who had received a single channel cochlear implant (House-Urban). The behavioral responses to the same stimuli were similar. 3. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses were studied in single channel cochlear implant subjects (3M/House). When evoked electrically, potential latencies were shorter and in- Lerpcak intervals narrower than acoustically evoked potentials.

AB - A series of experiments was performed to study electrically evoked potentials as indicators of subject response to cochlear implantation. 1. Brain stem evoked responses to electrical stimulation were compared to those obtained by acoustic stimulation in guinen pigs. Tlie response pattern was similar and was independent of the site of placement of the stimulus electrode (cochlear base or apex) or of the extracochlcnr ground electrode (eustachian tube or temporalis muscle) when evoked electrically. 2. Electrically evoked middle latency responses were recorded and compared to subjective behavioral thresholds in patients who had received a single channel cochlear implant (House-Urban). The behavioral responses to the same stimuli were similar. 3. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses were studied in single channel cochlear implant subjects (3M/House). When evoked electrically, potential latencies were shorter and in- Lerpcak intervals narrower than acoustically evoked potentials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022640554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022640554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 178

EP - 185

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 2

ER -