Electron-beam characteristics at extended treatment distances

I. J. Das, K. P. McGee, C. W. Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A uniform dose to the target site is required with a knowledge of delivered dose, central axis depth dose, and beam flatness for successful electron treatment at an extended source to surface distance (SSD). The central axis depth dose is shown to be nearly independent of moderate changes in the treatment distance. The delivered dose at a point could be calculated with the concept of virtual source position and an inverse square correction. In an extended SSD treatment, underdosage of the lateral tissue may occur due to reduced beam flatness. To study the changes in beam characteristics, the depth dose and beam flatness were measured at different SSDs for clinically used field sizes [(3x3)-(15x15) cm2] and beam energies ranging from 6 to 20 MeV. Our results indicate that the changes in depth dose are minimal except in the buildup region for most energies. In general, the surface dose is decreased (≤10%) as the SSD is increased moderately. Beam flatness was measured in terms of target coverage factor (TCF) defined as the ratio of the width of a specified isodose line to the geometrical field width. It was observed that the loss in beam flatness is significant for smaller fields, higher isodose lines, and lower energies. Variations in SSD have a minimal effect on the relative changes in beam flatness for field sizes greater than 8x8 cm2. The lateral loss of beam uniformity could be estimated by various parameters, such as the full width at half maximum, the homogeneity index, the uniformity index, and the TCF; however, TCF is a simpler parameter to use clinically. The beam characteristics (depth dose and TCF) at extended treatment distances are presented for electron beams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1667-1674
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Physics
Volume22
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Silver Sulfadiazine
Electrons

Keywords

  • beam flatness
  • electron beam
  • extended distance treatment
  • target coverage factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Das, I. J., McGee, K. P., & Cheng, C. W. (1995). Electron-beam characteristics at extended treatment distances. Medical Physics, 22(10), 1667-1674. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597431

Electron-beam characteristics at extended treatment distances. / Das, I. J.; McGee, K. P.; Cheng, C. W.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 22, No. 10, 1995, p. 1667-1674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Das, IJ, McGee, KP & Cheng, CW 1995, 'Electron-beam characteristics at extended treatment distances', Medical Physics, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1667-1674. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597431
Das, I. J. ; McGee, K. P. ; Cheng, C. W. / Electron-beam characteristics at extended treatment distances. In: Medical Physics. 1995 ; Vol. 22, No. 10. pp. 1667-1674.
@article{44bf9312e316453ca486dba8fc621c9c,
title = "Electron-beam characteristics at extended treatment distances",
abstract = "A uniform dose to the target site is required with a knowledge of delivered dose, central axis depth dose, and beam flatness for successful electron treatment at an extended source to surface distance (SSD). The central axis depth dose is shown to be nearly independent of moderate changes in the treatment distance. The delivered dose at a point could be calculated with the concept of virtual source position and an inverse square correction. In an extended SSD treatment, underdosage of the lateral tissue may occur due to reduced beam flatness. To study the changes in beam characteristics, the depth dose and beam flatness were measured at different SSDs for clinically used field sizes [(3x3)-(15x15) cm2] and beam energies ranging from 6 to 20 MeV. Our results indicate that the changes in depth dose are minimal except in the buildup region for most energies. In general, the surface dose is decreased (≤10{\%}) as the SSD is increased moderately. Beam flatness was measured in terms of target coverage factor (TCF) defined as the ratio of the width of a specified isodose line to the geometrical field width. It was observed that the loss in beam flatness is significant for smaller fields, higher isodose lines, and lower energies. Variations in SSD have a minimal effect on the relative changes in beam flatness for field sizes greater than 8x8 cm2. The lateral loss of beam uniformity could be estimated by various parameters, such as the full width at half maximum, the homogeneity index, the uniformity index, and the TCF; however, TCF is a simpler parameter to use clinically. The beam characteristics (depth dose and TCF) at extended treatment distances are presented for electron beams.",
keywords = "beam flatness, electron beam, extended distance treatment, target coverage factor",
author = "Das, {I. J.} and McGee, {K. P.} and Cheng, {C. W.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1118/1.597431",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1667--1674",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electron-beam characteristics at extended treatment distances

AU - Das, I. J.

AU - McGee, K. P.

AU - Cheng, C. W.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - A uniform dose to the target site is required with a knowledge of delivered dose, central axis depth dose, and beam flatness for successful electron treatment at an extended source to surface distance (SSD). The central axis depth dose is shown to be nearly independent of moderate changes in the treatment distance. The delivered dose at a point could be calculated with the concept of virtual source position and an inverse square correction. In an extended SSD treatment, underdosage of the lateral tissue may occur due to reduced beam flatness. To study the changes in beam characteristics, the depth dose and beam flatness were measured at different SSDs for clinically used field sizes [(3x3)-(15x15) cm2] and beam energies ranging from 6 to 20 MeV. Our results indicate that the changes in depth dose are minimal except in the buildup region for most energies. In general, the surface dose is decreased (≤10%) as the SSD is increased moderately. Beam flatness was measured in terms of target coverage factor (TCF) defined as the ratio of the width of a specified isodose line to the geometrical field width. It was observed that the loss in beam flatness is significant for smaller fields, higher isodose lines, and lower energies. Variations in SSD have a minimal effect on the relative changes in beam flatness for field sizes greater than 8x8 cm2. The lateral loss of beam uniformity could be estimated by various parameters, such as the full width at half maximum, the homogeneity index, the uniformity index, and the TCF; however, TCF is a simpler parameter to use clinically. The beam characteristics (depth dose and TCF) at extended treatment distances are presented for electron beams.

AB - A uniform dose to the target site is required with a knowledge of delivered dose, central axis depth dose, and beam flatness for successful electron treatment at an extended source to surface distance (SSD). The central axis depth dose is shown to be nearly independent of moderate changes in the treatment distance. The delivered dose at a point could be calculated with the concept of virtual source position and an inverse square correction. In an extended SSD treatment, underdosage of the lateral tissue may occur due to reduced beam flatness. To study the changes in beam characteristics, the depth dose and beam flatness were measured at different SSDs for clinically used field sizes [(3x3)-(15x15) cm2] and beam energies ranging from 6 to 20 MeV. Our results indicate that the changes in depth dose are minimal except in the buildup region for most energies. In general, the surface dose is decreased (≤10%) as the SSD is increased moderately. Beam flatness was measured in terms of target coverage factor (TCF) defined as the ratio of the width of a specified isodose line to the geometrical field width. It was observed that the loss in beam flatness is significant for smaller fields, higher isodose lines, and lower energies. Variations in SSD have a minimal effect on the relative changes in beam flatness for field sizes greater than 8x8 cm2. The lateral loss of beam uniformity could be estimated by various parameters, such as the full width at half maximum, the homogeneity index, the uniformity index, and the TCF; however, TCF is a simpler parameter to use clinically. The beam characteristics (depth dose and TCF) at extended treatment distances are presented for electron beams.

KW - beam flatness

KW - electron beam

KW - extended distance treatment

KW - target coverage factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028839624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028839624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.597431

DO - 10.1118/1.597431

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 1667

EP - 1674

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 10

ER -