Electronic medical record availability and primary care depression treatment

Jeffrey S. Harman, Kathryn M. Rost, Chris Harle, Robert L. Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMR) are commonly believed to improve quality of care. Primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions have potentially greater opportunity to benefit from receiving care at practices with EMRs if these systems help coordinate complex care. OBJECTIVE: To examine how chronic conditions impact the odds that depressed patients receive depression treatment in primary care practices with EMRs compared to practices without EMRs. DESIGN: The study uses logistic regression to analyze cross-sectional data of primary care physician office visits in freestanding, office-based practices from the 2006-2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys. PATIENTS: All visits to primary care providers made by patients ages 18 and older with physician-identified depression (N=3,467). MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes include depression treatment which is defined as receipt or ordering of antidepressant medication and/or mental health counseling. KEY RESULTS: EMRs were associated with significantly lowered odds that depressed patients received depression treatment (OR=0.75, p=0.009, 95% CI: 0.61- 0.93); however when stratified by the number of chronic conditions, this association was observed only in patients with three or more chronic conditions (OR= 0.50, p>0.001, 95% CI: 0.36-0.70). EMRs did not have a significant association with depression treatment for patients with two or fewer chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: EMRs appear to have an unintended negative association with depression care provided during visits made by primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)962-967
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Primary Health Care
Depression
Therapeutics
Health Care Surveys
Office Visits
Physicians' Offices
Quality of Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Antidepressive Agents
Counseling
Mental Health
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Physicians

Keywords

  • Chronic conditions
  • Depression
  • Electronic medical records

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Electronic medical record availability and primary care depression treatment. / Harman, Jeffrey S.; Rost, Kathryn M.; Harle, Chris; Cook, Robert L.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 8, 01.08.2012, p. 962-967.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harman, Jeffrey S. ; Rost, Kathryn M. ; Harle, Chris ; Cook, Robert L. / Electronic medical record availability and primary care depression treatment. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 27, No. 8. pp. 962-967.
@article{2d08cdd2f34e4a4d8a4e5237537ce37a,
title = "Electronic medical record availability and primary care depression treatment",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMR) are commonly believed to improve quality of care. Primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions have potentially greater opportunity to benefit from receiving care at practices with EMRs if these systems help coordinate complex care. OBJECTIVE: To examine how chronic conditions impact the odds that depressed patients receive depression treatment in primary care practices with EMRs compared to practices without EMRs. DESIGN: The study uses logistic regression to analyze cross-sectional data of primary care physician office visits in freestanding, office-based practices from the 2006-2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys. PATIENTS: All visits to primary care providers made by patients ages 18 and older with physician-identified depression (N=3,467). MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes include depression treatment which is defined as receipt or ordering of antidepressant medication and/or mental health counseling. KEY RESULTS: EMRs were associated with significantly lowered odds that depressed patients received depression treatment (OR=0.75, p=0.009, 95{\%} CI: 0.61- 0.93); however when stratified by the number of chronic conditions, this association was observed only in patients with three or more chronic conditions (OR= 0.50, p>0.001, 95{\%} CI: 0.36-0.70). EMRs did not have a significant association with depression treatment for patients with two or fewer chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: EMRs appear to have an unintended negative association with depression care provided during visits made by primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions.",
keywords = "Chronic conditions, Depression, Electronic medical records",
author = "Harman, {Jeffrey S.} and Rost, {Kathryn M.} and Chris Harle and Cook, {Robert L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-012-2001-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "962--967",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic medical record availability and primary care depression treatment

AU - Harman, Jeffrey S.

AU - Rost, Kathryn M.

AU - Harle, Chris

AU - Cook, Robert L.

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMR) are commonly believed to improve quality of care. Primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions have potentially greater opportunity to benefit from receiving care at practices with EMRs if these systems help coordinate complex care. OBJECTIVE: To examine how chronic conditions impact the odds that depressed patients receive depression treatment in primary care practices with EMRs compared to practices without EMRs. DESIGN: The study uses logistic regression to analyze cross-sectional data of primary care physician office visits in freestanding, office-based practices from the 2006-2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys. PATIENTS: All visits to primary care providers made by patients ages 18 and older with physician-identified depression (N=3,467). MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes include depression treatment which is defined as receipt or ordering of antidepressant medication and/or mental health counseling. KEY RESULTS: EMRs were associated with significantly lowered odds that depressed patients received depression treatment (OR=0.75, p=0.009, 95% CI: 0.61- 0.93); however when stratified by the number of chronic conditions, this association was observed only in patients with three or more chronic conditions (OR= 0.50, p>0.001, 95% CI: 0.36-0.70). EMRs did not have a significant association with depression treatment for patients with two or fewer chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: EMRs appear to have an unintended negative association with depression care provided during visits made by primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions.

AB - BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMR) are commonly believed to improve quality of care. Primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions have potentially greater opportunity to benefit from receiving care at practices with EMRs if these systems help coordinate complex care. OBJECTIVE: To examine how chronic conditions impact the odds that depressed patients receive depression treatment in primary care practices with EMRs compared to practices without EMRs. DESIGN: The study uses logistic regression to analyze cross-sectional data of primary care physician office visits in freestanding, office-based practices from the 2006-2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys. PATIENTS: All visits to primary care providers made by patients ages 18 and older with physician-identified depression (N=3,467). MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes include depression treatment which is defined as receipt or ordering of antidepressant medication and/or mental health counseling. KEY RESULTS: EMRs were associated with significantly lowered odds that depressed patients received depression treatment (OR=0.75, p=0.009, 95% CI: 0.61- 0.93); however when stratified by the number of chronic conditions, this association was observed only in patients with three or more chronic conditions (OR= 0.50, p>0.001, 95% CI: 0.36-0.70). EMRs did not have a significant association with depression treatment for patients with two or fewer chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: EMRs appear to have an unintended negative association with depression care provided during visits made by primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions.

KW - Chronic conditions

KW - Depression

KW - Electronic medical records

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864434463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864434463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-012-2001-0

DO - 10.1007/s11606-012-2001-0

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 962

EP - 967

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 8

ER -