Electronic medical record review as a surrogate to telephone follow-up to establish outcome for diagnostic research studies in the emergency department

Jeffrey Kline, Alice Mitchell, Michael S. Runyon, Alan E. Jones, William B. Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Follow-up for diagnostic research studies might be facilitated if medical record review (MRR) could be used instead of telephone calls. Objectives: The authors hypothesized that MRR would yield similar accuracy to telephone follow-up. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of 2,178 initially disease-free patients who were followed after enrollment in a diagnostic study of either acute coronary syndrome (45 days) or pulmonary embolism (90 days) conducted in an urban teaching emergency department (ED). Disease status (positive or negative) was defined explicitly. Using structured data forms, trained researchers performed MRR using a comprehensive electronic database, and formulated an opinion about disease status. Trained researchers, blinded to the MRR, then dialed telephone numbers, asked questions from a script, and categorized disease status. The criterion standard was adjudication by consensus of two of three physicians who independently determined disease status based on explicit criteria and access to all follow-up data. Results: Adjudicators found that 13 of 2,178 patients developed disease during follow-up; all 13 true positives occurred among the 2,054 (94.3%) of patients who acknowledged intent to return to the study hospital. Telephone follow-up was successful in 81% of patients, and found all 13 true positives (sensitivity 100%) but with three additional false-positive cases. MRR disclosed 12 of 13 cases of disease (sensitivity 92%) with no false-positive cases. Further review of the one false-negative case from MRR revealed that it occurred after the prescribed time limit for follow-up. Conclusions: Under limited circumstances, accurate clinical follow-up for diagnostic studies conducted in the ED can be obtained by medical record review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1127-1133
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume12
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Telephone
Medical Records
Hospital Emergency Service
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research Personnel
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Pulmonary Embolism
Teaching
Databases
Physicians
Research

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Follow-up studies
  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 1996
  • Informed consent
  • Medical record review
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Thromboembolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Electronic medical record review as a surrogate to telephone follow-up to establish outcome for diagnostic research studies in the emergency department. / Kline, Jeffrey; Mitchell, Alice; Runyon, Michael S.; Jones, Alan E.; Webb, William B.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 11, 11.2005, p. 1127-1133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{97210a37cd6f44459caa3217dc263e7c,
title = "Electronic medical record review as a surrogate to telephone follow-up to establish outcome for diagnostic research studies in the emergency department",
abstract = "Background: Follow-up for diagnostic research studies might be facilitated if medical record review (MRR) could be used instead of telephone calls. Objectives: The authors hypothesized that MRR would yield similar accuracy to telephone follow-up. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of 2,178 initially disease-free patients who were followed after enrollment in a diagnostic study of either acute coronary syndrome (45 days) or pulmonary embolism (90 days) conducted in an urban teaching emergency department (ED). Disease status (positive or negative) was defined explicitly. Using structured data forms, trained researchers performed MRR using a comprehensive electronic database, and formulated an opinion about disease status. Trained researchers, blinded to the MRR, then dialed telephone numbers, asked questions from a script, and categorized disease status. The criterion standard was adjudication by consensus of two of three physicians who independently determined disease status based on explicit criteria and access to all follow-up data. Results: Adjudicators found that 13 of 2,178 patients developed disease during follow-up; all 13 true positives occurred among the 2,054 (94.3{\%}) of patients who acknowledged intent to return to the study hospital. Telephone follow-up was successful in 81{\%} of patients, and found all 13 true positives (sensitivity 100{\%}) but with three additional false-positive cases. MRR disclosed 12 of 13 cases of disease (sensitivity 92{\%}) with no false-positive cases. Further review of the one false-negative case from MRR revealed that it occurred after the prescribed time limit for follow-up. Conclusions: Under limited circumstances, accurate clinical follow-up for diagnostic studies conducted in the ED can be obtained by medical record review.",
keywords = "Diagnosis, Follow-up studies, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 1996, Informed consent, Medical record review, Pulmonary embolism, Thromboembolism",
author = "Jeffrey Kline and Alice Mitchell and Runyon, {Michael S.} and Jones, {Alan E.} and Webb, {William B.}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1127--1133",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic medical record review as a surrogate to telephone follow-up to establish outcome for diagnostic research studies in the emergency department

AU - Kline, Jeffrey

AU - Mitchell, Alice

AU - Runyon, Michael S.

AU - Jones, Alan E.

AU - Webb, William B.

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Background: Follow-up for diagnostic research studies might be facilitated if medical record review (MRR) could be used instead of telephone calls. Objectives: The authors hypothesized that MRR would yield similar accuracy to telephone follow-up. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of 2,178 initially disease-free patients who were followed after enrollment in a diagnostic study of either acute coronary syndrome (45 days) or pulmonary embolism (90 days) conducted in an urban teaching emergency department (ED). Disease status (positive or negative) was defined explicitly. Using structured data forms, trained researchers performed MRR using a comprehensive electronic database, and formulated an opinion about disease status. Trained researchers, blinded to the MRR, then dialed telephone numbers, asked questions from a script, and categorized disease status. The criterion standard was adjudication by consensus of two of three physicians who independently determined disease status based on explicit criteria and access to all follow-up data. Results: Adjudicators found that 13 of 2,178 patients developed disease during follow-up; all 13 true positives occurred among the 2,054 (94.3%) of patients who acknowledged intent to return to the study hospital. Telephone follow-up was successful in 81% of patients, and found all 13 true positives (sensitivity 100%) but with three additional false-positive cases. MRR disclosed 12 of 13 cases of disease (sensitivity 92%) with no false-positive cases. Further review of the one false-negative case from MRR revealed that it occurred after the prescribed time limit for follow-up. Conclusions: Under limited circumstances, accurate clinical follow-up for diagnostic studies conducted in the ED can be obtained by medical record review.

AB - Background: Follow-up for diagnostic research studies might be facilitated if medical record review (MRR) could be used instead of telephone calls. Objectives: The authors hypothesized that MRR would yield similar accuracy to telephone follow-up. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of 2,178 initially disease-free patients who were followed after enrollment in a diagnostic study of either acute coronary syndrome (45 days) or pulmonary embolism (90 days) conducted in an urban teaching emergency department (ED). Disease status (positive or negative) was defined explicitly. Using structured data forms, trained researchers performed MRR using a comprehensive electronic database, and formulated an opinion about disease status. Trained researchers, blinded to the MRR, then dialed telephone numbers, asked questions from a script, and categorized disease status. The criterion standard was adjudication by consensus of two of three physicians who independently determined disease status based on explicit criteria and access to all follow-up data. Results: Adjudicators found that 13 of 2,178 patients developed disease during follow-up; all 13 true positives occurred among the 2,054 (94.3%) of patients who acknowledged intent to return to the study hospital. Telephone follow-up was successful in 81% of patients, and found all 13 true positives (sensitivity 100%) but with three additional false-positive cases. MRR disclosed 12 of 13 cases of disease (sensitivity 92%) with no false-positive cases. Further review of the one false-negative case from MRR revealed that it occurred after the prescribed time limit for follow-up. Conclusions: Under limited circumstances, accurate clinical follow-up for diagnostic studies conducted in the ED can be obtained by medical record review.

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Follow-up studies

KW - Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 1996

KW - Informed consent

KW - Medical record review

KW - Pulmonary embolism

KW - Thromboembolism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144530250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144530250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.012

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 16166598

AN - SCOPUS:27144530250

VL - 12

SP - 1127

EP - 1133

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 11

ER -